An open line architecture to enable white-box optical ecosystem

Abstract The white-box optical ecosystem is considered as the future trend in transport networks, which includes the openness in both software and hardware. The openness in hardware decomposes the equipment into multiple independent components to reduce costs. And the openness in software including general YANG models make all components controllable, which enables fast innovation in the control plane of software-defined networking (SDN). In this paper, an open line architecture (OLA) is proposed to implement the openness and disaggregation to enable white-box optical ecosystem. OLA defines a transport application interface (TAPI) to provide a flexible control of the open line system. To build the physical network, OLA uses the optical equipment developed by different manufacturers that follows specific YANG specifications. And in the control plane, OLA develops a series of drivers and applications to control the calculation, creation, and deletion of optical connectivity service. Finally, the paper shows OLA in use as part of a testbed, which demonstrates the feasibility of building networks consisting of both open and disaggregated hardware.

[1]  Carlo Cavazzoni,et al.  Comprehensive Survey on T-SDN: Software-Defined Networking for Transport Networks , 2017, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[2]  Gerhard P. Hancke,et al.  A Survey on 5G Networks for the Internet of Things: Communication Technologies and Challenges , 2018, IEEE Access.

[3]  Lei Xu,et al.  Enhancing Network Security through Software Defined Networking (SDN) , 2016, 2016 25th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN).

[4]  Esther Le Rouzic,et al.  Alien wavelengths over optical transport networks , 2018, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[5]  George Varghese,et al.  P4: programming protocol-independent packet processors , 2013, CCRV.

[6]  Van-Giang Nguyen,et al.  SDN and Virtualization-Based LTE Mobile Network Architectures: A Comprehensive Survey , 2016, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[7]  Keith Kirkpatrick,et al.  Software-defined networking , 2013, CACM.

[8]  Jan Medved,et al.  OpenDaylight: Towards a Model-Driven SDN Controller architecture , 2014, Proceeding of IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks 2014.

[9]  Marivi Higuero,et al.  A Survey on the Contributions of Software-Defined Networking to Traffic Engineering , 2017, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[10]  Nick McKeown,et al.  OpenFlow: enabling innovation in campus networks , 2008, CCRV.

[11]  Wolfgang Kellerer,et al.  Software Defined Optical Networks (SDONs): A Comprehensive Survey , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[12]  Ying Wang,et al.  Coordination between control layer AI and on-board AI in optical transport networks [Invited] , 2019, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.