The Impact of Corneal Edema on Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, Tono-Pen XL, iCare, and ORA: An In Vitro Model

Purpose:Among other corneal biomechanical properties, Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) has been shown to depend on corneal edema. New tonometry devices have been designed, such as the Tono-Pen XL, iCare, and ocular response analyzer (ORA), to measure the intraocular pressure (IOP) accurately. This study aims to investigate the influence of corneal edema on the accuracy of these IOP-measuring devices in an in vitro model. Methods:A model of an artificial anterior chamber was developed using a guided trephination system. Eight donor corneas not suitable for keratoplasty were clamped into this artificial anterior chamber. All corneas showed signs of stromal edema. Intracameral pressure (ICP) was adjusted manometrically to 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 mm Hg. The central corneal thickness (CCT) was determined by ultrasonic pachymetry. For each manometrically defined ICP, tonometry was performed using the iCare, Tono-Pen XL, GAT, and ORA. Results:The mean CCT increased from 616.1±29.6 µm to 626.9±36.1 µm. At 10 mm Hg, GAT yielded a higher ICP than those manometrically adjusted (10.4±3.3 mm Hg); at all other ICP levels, GAT yielded lower ICP levels than those adjusted. The Tono-Pen XL and iCare showed the greatest difference at 10 mm Hg, with the Tono-Pen XL yielding a value of 14.0±4.0 mm Hg and the iCare yielding a value of 12.5±2.6 mm Hg. All other results of the 2 devices fell within a range of ±2 mm Hg from the adjusted ICP. The ORA provided accurate results only at “physiological” ICP levels with a maximum difference of 2.6 mm Hg at 30 mm Hg. At higher ICP levels, corneal hysteresis decreased significantly with increasing ICP. None of the measurement devices revealed a statistically relevant dependence on CCT in this experimental setting. Conclusions:The Tono-Pen XL and the iCare yielded the most accurate ICP values across all the adjusted ICP values. This may be because of their relatively small contact area with the cornea and, consequently, greater independence from corneal biomechanical properties. The ORA yielded accurate measurement results only at physiological ICP levels. As anticipated, GAT underestimated ICP. The Tono-Pen XL and the iCare should therefore be used to determine IOP in patients suffering from corneal edema, such as bullous keratopathy or Fuchs endothelial dystrophy.

[1]  D. Böhringer,et al.  Recovery of corneal hysteresis after reduction of intraocular pressure in chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma. , 2010, American journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  M. Shimmyo Recovery of corneal hysteresis after reduction of intraocular pressure in chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma. , 2009, American journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  A. Wells,et al.  The iCare rebound tonometer: comparisons with Goldmann tonometry, and influence of central corneal thickness , 2009, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[4]  G. Shemesh,et al.  Measurements of Intraocular Pressure by Goldmann Tonometry, Tonopen XL, and the Transpalpebral Tonometer, TGDc-01, After Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Comparativye Study , 2009, Cornea.

[5]  Jianhua Wang,et al.  Recovery of corneal hysteresis after reduction of intraocular pressure in chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma. , 2009, American journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  Rex D. Hamilton,et al.  Corneal biomechanical measurements before and after laser in situ keratomileusis , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[7]  J. González-Méijome,et al.  Correlations Between Corneal Biomechanical Properties Measured With the Ocular Response Analyzer and ICare Rebound Tonometry , 2008, Journal of glaucoma.

[8]  J. B. Rehnman,et al.  Comparison of rebound and applanation tonometry in the management of patients treated for glaucoma or ocular hypertension , 2008, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[9]  E. Spoerl,et al.  Dynamic contour tonometry in comparison to intracameral IOP measurements. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  H. Thieme,et al.  Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer over a wide IOP range , 2008, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[11]  R. Mills,et al.  Clinical Comparison of the Icare Tonometer and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry , 2008, Journal of glaucoma.

[12]  N. Congdon,et al.  Influence of Corneal Structure, Corneal Responsiveness, and Other Ocular Parameters on Tonometric Measurement of Intraocular Pressure , 2007, Journal of glaucoma.

[13]  M. Grossherr,et al.  [The influence of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor on the measurement of intraocular pressure]. , 2007, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[14]  A. Viestenz,et al.  Evaluierung der Reboundtonometrie (ICare) im Vergleich zum TonopenXL und dem Goldmann-Applanationstonometer , 2007, Der Ophthalmologe.

[15]  Ahmed Elsheikh,et al.  Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  K. Beraki,et al.  Regeneration of the epithelium in organ-cultured donor corneas with extended post-mortem time. , 2006, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[17]  M. L. Salvetat,et al.  Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma. , 2006, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[18]  N. Pfeiffer,et al.  Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.

[19]  Felipe A. Medeiros,et al.  Evaluation of the Influence of Corneal Biomechanical Properties on Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using the Ocular Response Analyzer , 2006, Journal of glaucoma.

[20]  Makoto Nakamura,et al.  Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  E. Spoerl,et al.  Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry. , 2006, Archives of ophthalmology.

[22]  N. Jansonius,et al.  Three portable tonometers, the TGDc‐01, the ICARE and the Tonopen XL, compared with each other and with Goldmann applanation tonometry * , 2005, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[23]  J. Jonas,et al.  Dynamic contour tonometry for intraocular pressure measurement. , 2005, American journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  J. Funk,et al.  Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study , 2005, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[25]  D. Luce Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[26]  A. Rotchford,et al.  The effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurement in patients with corneal pathology , 2004, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[27]  R. Stamper,et al.  Dynamic contour tonometry: a comparative study on human cadaver eyes. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[28]  Sunil Shah,et al.  Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[29]  A. Mermoud,et al.  New TonoPen XL: Comparison with the Goldmann tonometer , 2001, Eye.

[30]  J. Funk,et al.  Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readings , 2001, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[31]  T. Reinhard,et al.  [Impression and applanation tonometry in irregular corneas. Comparison with intraocular needle tonometry]. , 2000, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[32]  A. Kontiola,et al.  A new induction-based impact method for measuring intraocular pressure. , 2000, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[33]  T. Reinhard,et al.  Determining real IOP values. , 1999, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[34]  P. Kaufman,et al.  Intraocular pressure measurement in cynomolgus monkeys. Tono-Pen versus manometry. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[35]  W. Mcalister,et al.  Clinical evaluation of five portable tonometers. , 1995, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[36]  A. Wigers,et al.  Clinical comparison of the ProTon and Tono-Pen tonometers with the Goldmann applanation tonometer. , 1994, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[37]  M. Whitacre,et al.  Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. , 1993, Survey of ophthalmology.

[38]  R. Stein,et al.  The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. , 1993, American journal of ophthalmology.

[39]  J. Parel,et al.  Effect of corneal hydration on Goldmann applanation tonometry and corneal topography. , 1993, Refractive & corneal surgery.

[40]  D. Shin,et al.  Comparison of the Tono-Pen to the Goldmann applanation tonometer. , 1988, Archives of ophthalmology.

[41]  N. Ehlers,et al.  APPLANATION TONOMETRY AND CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS , 1975, Acta ophthalmologica.

[42]  A. Lam,et al.  The influence of corneal properties on rebound tonometry. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[43]  Yong Yeon Kim,et al.  The effect of contact lens-induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry , 2008, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[44]  A. Langenbucher,et al.  [A comparison of rebound tonometry (ICare) with TonoPenXL and Goldmann applanation tonometry]. , 2007, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[45]  S. Azen,et al.  Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[46]  B. Schroeder,et al.  Der Einfluss von kornealer Hysterese und kornealem Resistenzfaktor auf die Messung des intraokularen Drucks , 2007, Der Ophthalmologe.

[47]  S. Cronemberger,et al.  [Central and peripheral corneal thickness: influence on the iop measurement by Tonopen]. , 2006, Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia.