Computationally-efficient stochastic cluster dynamics method for modeling damage accumulation in irradiated materials

An improved version of a recently developed stochastic cluster dynamics (SCD) method (Marian and Bulatov, 2012) 6 is introduced as an alternative to rate theory (RT) methods for solving coupled ordinary differential equation (ODE) systems for irradiation damage simulations. SCD circumvents by design the curse of dimensionality of the variable space that renders traditional ODE-based RT approaches inefficient when handling complex defect population comprised of multiple (more than two) defect species. Several improvements introduced here enable efficient and accurate simulations of irradiated materials up to realistic (high) damage doses characteristic of next-generation nuclear systems. The first improvement is a procedure for efficiently updating the defect reaction-network and event selection in the context of a dynamically expanding reaction-network. Next is a novel implementation of the ?-leaping method that speeds up SCD simulations by advancing the state of the reaction network in large time increments when appropriate. Lastly, a volume rescaling procedure is introduced to control the computational complexity of the expanding reaction-network through occasional reductions of the defect population while maintaining accurate statistics. The enhanced SCD method is then applied to model defect cluster accumulation in iron thin films subjected to triple ion-beam (Fe3+, He+ and H+) irradiations, for which standard RT or spatially-resolved kinetic Monte Carlo simulations are prohibitively expensive.

[1]  Hong Li,et al.  Efficient formulation of the stochastic simulation algorithm for chemically reacting systems. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[2]  Nagiza F. Samatova,et al.  The sorting direct method for stochastic simulation of biochemical systems with varying reaction execution behavior , 2006, Comput. Biol. Chem..

[3]  Linda Petzold,et al.  Logarithmic Direct Method for Discrete Stochastic Simulation of Chemically Reacting Systems ∗ , 2006 .

[4]  B. L. Eyre,et al.  Cascade damage effects on the swelling of irradiated materials , 1975, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[5]  Linda R. Petzold,et al.  Improved leap-size selection for accelerated stochastic simulation , 2003 .

[6]  D. Vlachos,et al.  Binomial distribution based tau-leap accelerated stochastic simulation. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[7]  Vasily V. Bulatov,et al.  Stochastic cluster dynamics method for simulations of multispecies irradiation damage accumulation , 2011 .

[8]  J. Rawlings,et al.  Approximate simulation of coupled fast and slow reactions for stochastic chemical kinetics , 2002 .

[9]  Louis K. Mansur The reaction rate theory of radiation effects , 1996 .

[10]  Michael A. Gibson,et al.  Efficient Exact Stochastic Simulation of Chemical Systems with Many Species and Many Channels , 2000 .

[11]  Enrique Martínez,et al.  Billion-atom synchronous parallel kinetic Monte Carlo simulations of critical 3D Ising systems , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..

[12]  D G Vlachos,et al.  Overcoming stiffness in stochastic simulation stemming from partial equilibrium: a multiscale Monte Carlo algorithm. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[13]  Nasr M. Ghoniem,et al.  A rate theory of swelling induced by helium and displacement damage in fusion reactor structural materials , 1982 .

[14]  Layne T. Watson,et al.  Stochastic Simulation Algorithms for Chemical Reactions , 2008, BIOCOMP.

[15]  D. Gillespie A General Method for Numerically Simulating the Stochastic Time Evolution of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1976 .

[16]  M. Kiritani,et al.  Analysis of the Clustering Process of Supersaturated Lattice Vacancies , 1973 .

[17]  D. Gillespie Approximate accelerated stochastic simulation of chemically reacting systems , 2001 .

[18]  Dan ie l T. Gil lespie A rigorous derivation of the chemical master equation , 1992 .

[19]  K. Burrage,et al.  Binomial leap methods for simulating stochastic chemical kinetics. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[20]  Uri M. Ascher,et al.  Computer methods for ordinary differential equations and differential-algebraic equations , 1998 .

[21]  Masahiro Koiwa,et al.  On the Validity of the Grouping Method —Comments on "Analysis of the Clustering Process of Supersaturated Lattice Vacancies"— , 1974 .

[22]  Solène Le Bourdiec,et al.  Hybrid deterministic/stochastic algorithm for large sets of rate equations , 2012, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[23]  D. Gillespie,et al.  Avoiding negative populations in explicit Poisson tau-leaping. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[24]  Xiaodong Cai,et al.  Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions with delays. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[25]  A. E. Sand,et al.  High-energy collision cascades in tungsten: Dislocation loops structure and clustering scaling laws , 2013, 1306.3824.

[26]  Eiichi Wakai,et al.  Synergistic effect of helium and hydrogen for defect evolution under multi-ion irradiation of Fe-Cr ferritic alloys , 2004 .

[27]  Muruhan Rathinam,et al.  Stiffness in stochastic chemically reacting systems: The implicit tau-leaping method , 2003 .

[28]  Linda R Petzold,et al.  Efficient step size selection for the tau-leaping simulation method. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.