The effect of women’s representation on the Global Gender Gap Index

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to find the most important factors to the Index that explains gender gaps in education, health, politics, and economic outcomes worldwide. Design/methodology/approach World Economic Forum (WEF) data are analyzed using hedonic regression analysis to estimate which factors affect a country’s Global Gender Gap Index. Standardized β coefficients reveal the top five factors influencing the Index, just as key components of the US Consumer Price Index are teased out using this method. Findings Women in public sector management, administration, and politics explain a substantial portion of gender inequality. Policies to increase women’s representation in parliaments, as heads of state, in ministerial positions, and in public sector management mitigate inequality as gauged by the Gender Gap Index. Economic indicators are also among the leading components of the Gender Gap Index. Research limitations/implications Although comprehensive and drawn from several sources including the World Health Organization, the International Labour Organization, and the United Nations Development Programme, WEF data do not capture the full experience of women worldwide. Subsequent qualitative research is recommended. Practical implications This analysis reveals policy recommendations for advocates working to close gender gaps, particularly in politics and economic outcomes. Increasing proportions of women in public sector management can mitigate inequality. This supports electoral quotas and human resource management initiatives to diversify management ranks. Social implications Increasing women’s share of public sector managerial positions fosters gender equity, as does increasing women’s share of elected and appointed positions. Originality/value This study provides quantitative evidence of the important role of women’s representation to guide subsequent fieldwork. This evidence supports efforts to increase women in elective office and public sector management.

[1]  Katherine C. Naff.  To Look Like America: Dismantling Barriers For Women And Minorities In Government , 2018 .

[2]  S. Grimmelikhuijsen,et al.  Experimental public administration from 1992 to 2014: A systematic literature review and ways forward , 2016 .

[3]  John D. Marvel,et al.  Bureaucratic Discretion, Client Demographics, and Representative Bureaucracy , 2015 .

[4]  M. R. Hamilton,et al.  Democracy and Public Service , 2015 .

[5]  Niall Gilmartin.  ‘Negotiating New Roles' , 2015 .

[6]  Norma M. Riccucci,et al.  Representative Bureaucracy in Policing: Does It Increase Perceived Legitimacy? , 2014 .

[7]  Brandy A. Kennedy.  Unraveling Representative Bureaucracy , 2014 .

[8]  M. Frazier,et al.  Representative Bureaucracy , 2013 .

[9]  D. W. Cartwright.  Improved Deflation of Purchases of Computers , 2013 .

[10]  Bettina Campedelli,et al.  Factors affecting the performance of water utility companies , 2011 .

[11]  J. Squires.  Gender and Minority Representation in Parliament , 2010 .

[12]  P. Meier,et al.  Towards a New Theory on the Symbolic Representation of Women , 2010 .

[13]  Teresa Sacchet.  Beyond Numbers , 2008 .

[14]  Drude Dahlerup.  Gender Quotas – Controversial But Trendy , 2008 .

[15]  P. Meier.  A Gender Gap Not Closed by Quotas , 2008 .

[16]  Gretchen Bauer.  Fifty/Fifty by 20201 , 2008 .

[17]  M. Page,et al.  Why not teach “diversity” to public sector managers? , 2008 .

[18]  R. Tiessen.  Small Victories But Slow Progress , 2008 .

[19]  Delgado Blanco,et al.  Women: Power and Development in Latin America , 2008 .

[20]  J. Kellough,et al.  Representative Bureaucracy: Exploring the Potential for Active Representation in Local Government , 2007 .

[21]  David W. Pitts.  Representative Bureaucracy, Ethnicity, and Public Schools , 2007 .

[22]  Drude Dahlerup.  ELECTORAL GENDER QUOTAS: BETWEEN EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY AND EQUALITY OF RESULT , 2007 .

[23]  Drude Dahlerup.  Global Database of Quotas for Women , 2007 .

[24]  Drude Dahlerup,et al.  Quotas as a ‘fast track’ to equal representation for women: Why Scandinavia is no longer the model , 2005 .

[25]  K. Loscocco,et al.  Agency Leaders, Gendered Institutions, and Representative Bureaucracy , 2005 .

[26]  O. Omar,et al.  A qualitative evaluation of women as managers in the Nigerian Civil Service , 2004 .

[27]  K. Henderson.  Characterizing American public administration , 2004 .

[28]  Jessica E. Sowa,et al.  Administrative Discretion and Active Representation: An Expansion of the Theory of Representative Bureaucracy , 2003 .

[29]  Lael R. Keiser,et al.  Lipstick and Logarithms: Gender, Institutional Context, and Representative Bureaucracy , 2002, American Political Science Review.

[30]  Julie A. Dolan.  Representative Bureaucracy in the Federal Executive: Gender and Spending Priorities , 2002 .

[31]  Andrew E. Clark,et al.  What really matters in a job? Hedonic measurement using quit data , 2001 .

[32]  R. M. Kelly,et al.  The Gendered Bureaucracy , 2001 .

[33]  A. I. Abdulai.  Human resource management in Ghana: prescriptions and issues raised by the Fourth Republican Constitution , 2000 .

[34]  K. Meier,et al.  Representative Bureaucracy and Distributional Equity: Addressing the Hard Question , 1999, The Journal of Politics.

[35]  J. Barry,et al.  Gender and public service : a case study of Mumbai , 1998 .

[36]  Norma M. Riccucci,et al.  The Representativeness of State-Level Bureaucratic Leaders: A Missing Piece of the Representative Bureaucracy Puzzle , 1997 .

[37]  Paul R. Liegey,et al.  Apparel price indexes: Effects of hedonic adjustment , 1994 .

[38]  Mark A. McBriarty.  Personnel Administration vs. Human Resource Management: The Civil Service Dilemma , 1988 .

[39]  Jon P. Nelson,et al.  Residential choice, hedonic prices, and the demand for urban air quality , 1978 .

[40]  K. Meier,et al.  Representative Bureaucracy and Policy Preferences: A Study in the Attitudes of Federal Executives , 1976 .

[41]  J. Triplett.  Automobiles and Hedonic Quality Measurement , 1969, Journal of Political Economy.