A comparison of four methods for bubble size and void fraction measurements

We compare the performance of four different bubble-sensing techniques in a range of environment from the surf zone to the open ocean: a remote sensing method using high-frequency backscatter, two in situ methods using an acoustical resonator and a pulse propagation sensor, and a bulk method using electrical conductivity. Comparisons between the techniques show general consistency within the appropriate operational bubble density ranges, although spatial variability in bubble clouds introduces substantial variance. Each technique has its strengths and limitations. Our acoustical resonator is suitable for bubble concentrations with air fractions greater than approximately 10/sup -9/ and the pulse propagation sonar for air fractions from 10/sup -6/; the upper limit for both is constrained by attenuation and the validity of the Foldy scattering approximation. Both sensors can be implemented to encompass a wide frequency range with high resolution, corresponding to resonant bubble radii of 10/spl sim/1200 /spl mu/m. For air fractions higher than /spl sim/5/spl times/10/sup -4/, bulk measurement using electrical conductivity provides a measure of air fraction. Sufficient overlap in operational air-fraction range exists between in situ acoustical techniques and conductivity measurement to permit comparison and demonstrate consistency in the measurement. Single- and multi-frequency backscatter sonars may be used for low air fractions (<1/spl times/10/sup -5/) and provide a continuous vertical profile from a deployment beneath the active surface zone, but are subject to masking by dense bubble clouds and are unable to resolve high air fractions close to the surface. This study suggests that the best approach is to use a combination of sensors to probe the bubble field.

[1]  J. Field,et al.  Bubble Sizing by the Nonlinear Scattering of Two Acoustic Frequencies , 1993 .

[2]  W. Melville,et al.  SOUND-SPEED MEASUREMENTS NEAR THE OCEAN SURFACE , 1994 .

[3]  Vernon L. Newhouse,et al.  Bubble size measurements using the nonlinear mixing of two frequencies , 1984 .

[4]  Mingsheng Su,et al.  Laboratory Comparisons of Acoustic and Optical Sensors for Microbubble Measurement , 1994 .

[5]  Timothy G. Leighton,et al.  The use of a combination frequency technique to measure the surf zone bubble population , 1997 .

[6]  Andrea Prosperetti,et al.  Thermal effects and damping mechanisms in the forced radial oscillations of gas bubbles in liquids , 1977 .

[7]  Timothy G. Leighton,et al.  Acoustic bubble sizing by combination of subharmonic emissions with imaging frequency , 1991 .

[8]  David M. Farmer,et al.  A Free-Flooding Acoustical Resonator for Measurement of Bubble Size Distributions , 1998 .

[9]  Robert J. Urick,et al.  Sound propagation in the sea , 1982 .

[10]  Kerry W. Commander,et al.  Finite-element solution of the inverse problem in bubble swarm acoustics , 1991 .

[11]  W. Melville,et al.  Air entrainment and dissipation in breaking waves , 1991, Nature.

[12]  É. Lamarre An Experimental Study of Air Entrainment by Breaking Waves. , 1993 .

[13]  Anthony I. Eller,et al.  Damping Constants of Pulsating Bubbles , 1970 .

[14]  Herman Medwin,et al.  In situ acoustic measurements of bubble populations in coastal ocean waters , 1970 .

[15]  H. Medwin,et al.  Counting bubbles acoustically: a review , 1977 .

[16]  P. Mulhearn,et al.  Photographic measurements of bubble populations from breaking wind waves at sea , 1987 .

[17]  Timothy G. Leighton,et al.  The detection of tethered and rising bubbles using multiple acoustic techniques , 1997 .

[18]  R. Bernier Unsteady Two-Phase Flow Instrumentation and Measurement , 1982 .

[19]  L. Foldy,et al.  The Multiple Scattering of Waves. I. General Theory of Isotropic Scattering by Randomly Distributed Scatterers , 1945 .

[20]  Z. Ye,et al.  Acoustic dispersion and attenuation relations in bubbly mixture , 1995 .

[21]  Herman Medwin,et al.  In situ acoustic measurements of microbubbles at sea , 1977 .

[22]  J. Gemmrich,et al.  Measurements of Temperature Fluctuations in Breaking Surface Waves , 1996 .

[23]  David M. Farmer,et al.  The Measurement of Bubble-Size Distributions by Acoustical Backscatter , 1992 .

[24]  A. Sangani A pairwise interaction theory for determining the linear acoustic properties of dilute bubbly liquids , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[25]  K. G. Foote,et al.  A technique for calibration of monostatic echosounder systems , 1996 .

[26]  B. Jähne,et al.  Laboratory and inshore measurements of bubble size distributions , 1997 .

[27]  J. Szczucka Acoustic detection of gas bubbles in the sea , 1990 .

[28]  P. Dahl,et al.  On bubble clouds produced by breaking waves: An event analysis of ocean acoustic measurements , 1995 .

[29]  Andrea Prosperetti,et al.  Linear pressure waves in bubbly liquids: Comparison between theory and experiments , 1989 .

[30]  David M. Farmer,et al.  Waveguide propagation of ambient sound in the ocean-surface bubble layer , 1989 .

[31]  Eric Lamarre,et al.  Void-fraction measurements and sound-speed fields in bubble plumes generated by breaking waves , 1994 .

[32]  R. C. Cooke,et al.  Bubble populations and spectra in coastal waters: A photographic approach , 1979 .

[33]  Herman Medwin,et al.  Ambient and transient bubble spectral densities in quiescent seas and under spilling breakers , 1989 .

[34]  S. Thorpe,et al.  On the clouds of bubbles formed by breaking wind-waves in deep water, and their role in air-sea gas transfer , 1982, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[35]  Herman Medwin,et al.  Acoustical determinations of bubble‐size spectra , 1977 .

[36]  Herman Medwin,et al.  Instrumentation for in situ acoustical measurements of bubble spectra under breaking waves , 1989 .

[37]  G. Deane Sound generation and air entrainment by breaking waves in the surf zone , 1997 .

[38]  V. A. Akulichev,et al.  The Study of Sound Backscattering From Microinhomogeneities in Sea Water , 1987 .