Magnetic Stimulation of Extrastriate Body Area Impairs Visual Processing of Nonfacial Body Parts

Functional magnetic resonance imaging indicates that observation of the human body induces a selective activation of a lateral occipitotemporal cortical area called extrastriate body area (EBA). This area is responsive to static and moving images of the human body and parts of it, but it is insensitive to faces and stimulus categories unrelated to the human body. With event-related repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, we tested the possible causal relation between neural activity in EBA and visual processing of body-related, nonfacial stimuli. Facial and noncorporeal stimuli were used as a control. Interference with neural activity in EBA induced a clear impairment, consisting of a significant increase in discriminative reaction time, in the visual processing of body parts. The effect was selective for stimulus type, because it affected responses to nonfacial body stimuli but not to noncorporeal and facial stimuli, and for locus of stimulation, because the effect from the interfering stimulation of EBA was absent during a corresponding stimulation of primary visual cortex. The results provide strong evidence that neural activity in EBA is not only correlated with but also causally involved in the visual processing of the human body and its parts, except the face.

[1]  M. Farah,et al.  The psychological reality of the body schema: a test with normal participants. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Chi-Hung Juan,et al.  Feedback to V1: a reverse hierarchy in vision , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Extrastriate body area in human occipital cortex responds to the performance of motor actions , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  U. Mosimann,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry in visuospatial attention assessed with transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[6]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  C. Guariglia,et al.  Is autotopoagnosia real? EC says yes. A case study , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Active during Visual Perception of Biological Motion , 2002, Neuron.

[9]  E. Wassermann.  Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  C. Price,et al.  A functional neuroimaging study of the variables that generate category-specific object processing differences. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Handbook of transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2002 .

[12]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognitive neuroscience , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  Atsushi Yamadori,et al.  Category-specific comprehension deficit restricted to body parts , 1997 .

[14]  The psychological reality of the body schema: a test with normal participants. , 1995 .

[15]  J. Marshall,et al.  Unilateral Somatoparaphrenia After Right Hemisphere Stroke: A Case Description , 1995, Cortex.

[16]  S. Aglioti,et al.  The body in the brain: neural bases of corporeal awareness , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[17]  S. Aglioti,et al.  Disownership of left hand and objects related to it in a patient with right brain damage , 1996, Neuroreport.

[18]  Guy Orban,et al.  The Role of Lateral Occipitotemporal Junction and Area MT/V5 in the Visual Analysis of Upper-Limb Postures , 2000, NeuroImage.

[19]  V. Stone,et al.  The Body-Inversion Effect , 2003, Psychological science.

[20]  P. Downing,et al.  Bodies capture attention when nothing is expected , 2004, Cognition.

[21]  Tjeerd Jellema,et al.  Cells in monkey STS responsive to articulated body motions and consequent static posture: a case of implied motion? , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Faces and objects in macaque cerebral cortex , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Domain-Specific Knowledge Systems in the Brain: The Animate-Inanimate Distinction , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Aina Puce,et al.  Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[25]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Distinct Cortical Areas for Names of Numbers and Body Parts Independent of Language and Input Modality , 2000, NeuroImage.

[26]  A. Paans,et al.  Brain Activation Related to the Representations of External Space and Body Scheme in Visuomotor Control , 2001, NeuroImage.

[27]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[28]  O. Blanke,et al.  Out-of-body experience and autoscopy of neurological origin. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Involved in Perception of Biological Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The Selective Sparing of Body Part Knowledge: A Case Study , 1998 .

[31]  G B Arden,et al.  The Visual System , 2021, AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 6th Edition, 2021.

[32]  M. Petrides,et al.  Neural correlates of mental transformations of the body-in-space. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Eleanor M. Saffran,et al.  Knowledge of the human body: A distinct semantic domain , 2002, Neurology.

[34]  J. Haxby,et al.  Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  P. Downing,et al.  Selectivity for the human body in the fusiform gyrus. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  J. Barton,et al.  Disorders of face perception and recognition. , 2003, Neurologic clinics.

[37]  R. Nebes,et al.  Patterns of Hand Preference in a Student Population , 1975, Cortex.

[38]  Sarah H. Creem,et al.  An fMRI study of imagined self-rotation , 2001, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[39]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Human Body , 2001 .

[40]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Calling a squirrel a squirrel but a canoe a wigwam: a category-specific deficit for artefactual objects and body parts , 1992 .

[41]  Simone Rossi,et al.  TMS in cognitive plasticity and the potential for rehabilitation , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  J. Talairach,et al.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging , 1988 .

[43]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Category-specific modulation of inferior temporal activity during working memory encoding and maintenance. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.