Comparison between coreless and slotless kinds of dual rotor discs hysteresis motors

Hysteresis motors have some distinct advantages such as constant speed and torque, noiseless operation, robust structure, and low-starting current in comparison with other synchronous motors. The main general defects of the hysteresis machines are low efficiency and relatively low-torque density. In this study, two previously proposed structures for the hysteresis motors named ‘coreless dual rotor discs hysteresis motor’ and ‘slotless dual rotor discs hysteresis motor’ are compared with each other and with other conventional hysteresis motors from different aspects. Rectifying the iron loss in the coreless type, especially in high-speed applications, and rotor parasitic loss in the slotless type are the most important advantages of these structures. Relative ease of manufacturing process, low production cost, and extendable torque (by multi stack structure) are other significant advantages of these motors. On the basis of two derived optimal designs for the motors, the performances of the motors are compared in different supply voltages.

[1]  Maurizio Repetto,et al.  Analysis of Hysteresis Motor Starting Torque Using Finite Element Method and Scalar Static Hysteresis Model , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[2]  M. Sadeghi,et al.  Design Optimization of Multistack Coreless Disk-Type Hysteresis Motor , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[3]  M. A. Copeland,et al.  An Analysis of the Hysteresis Motor Part III: Parasitic Losses , 1969 .

[4]  Ezio Santini,et al.  Multi-stage axial-flux PM machine for wheel direct drive , 1995 .

[5]  Karthikeyan Rajagopal Design of a compact hysteresis motor used in a gyroscope , 2003 .

[6]  A. M. Osheiba,et al.  Transient Performance of Hysteresis Motors with Ferrite Magnets , 1986 .

[7]  Mohammad Modarres,et al.  Rotor design to improve dynamic performance of axial flux hysteresis motors , 2015 .

[8]  G. Slemon,et al.  Effects of samarium cobalt permanent magnet on the performance of polyphase hysteresis-reluctance motors , 1984 .

[9]  Mariusz Jagiela,et al.  Time-domain and frequency-domain finite element models of a solid-rotor induction/hysteresis motor , 2010 .

[10]  Randy L. Haupt,et al.  Comparison between genetic and gradient-based optimization algorithms for solving electromagnetics problems , 1995 .

[11]  Teymoor Ghanbari,et al.  Coreless Dual-rotor Disc Hysteresis Motor, Modeling, and Performance Prediction , 2010 .

[12]  Teymoor Ghanbari,et al.  Slotless axial flux hysteresis motor, modelling and performance calculation , 2009 .

[13]  G. Wakui,et al.  Hysteresis motor using magnetically anisotropic Fe-Cr-Co magnet , 1998 .

[14]  L. Mendelsohn Heat treating P6 alloy for special properties for a four element gyro system , 1973 .

[15]  M. A. Rahman,et al.  PERFORMANCE OF HYSTERESIS PERMANENT MAGNET MOTORS , 1989 .

[16]  S. Gavril,et al.  ASYNCHRONOUS PERFORMANCE OF HYSTERESIS MOTOR CONSIDERING EDDY-CURRENT EFFECTS , 1983 .

[17]  S. Gavril,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF THE HYSTERESIS MOTOR , 1982 .

[18]  Mariusz Jagiela,et al.  Design of High-Speed Hybrid Hysteresis Motor Rotor Using Finite Element Model and Decision Process , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.