Using susceptibility-weighted imaging to determine response to combined anti-angiogenic, cytotoxic, and radiation therapy in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

BACKGROUND The goal of this study was to investigate whether the amount of hypointense signal on susceptibility-weighted imaging within the contrast-enhancing lesion (%SWI-h) on the pretreatment scan could determine response in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme who received external beam radiation therapy with concomitant anti-angiogenic therapy (enzastaurin) and cytotoxic chemotherapy (temozolomide). METHODS Twenty-five patients were imaged before therapy (postsurgical resection) and scanned serially every 2 months until progression. Standard clinical MR imaging and SWI were performed on a 3T scanner. %SWI-h was quantified for each patient's pretreatment scan. Time to progression and death were used to characterize patients into non-, immediate-, and sustained-response groups for both events. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between %SWI-h and both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Classification and regression tree analysis were used to determine optimal cutoffs on which to split %SWI-h. RESULTS For both death- and progression-based response categories, %SWI-h was significantly higher in sustained responders than in nonresponders. Cox model coefficients showed an association between %SWI-h and PFS and OS, both in univariate analysis (PFS: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.966, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.942-0.988; and OS: HR = 0.945, 95% CI = 0.915-0.976) and when adjusting for baseline KPS, age, sex, and resection extent (PFS: HR = 0.968, 95% CI = 0.940 -0.994; and OS: HR = 0.943, 95% CI = 0.908 -0.976). A cutoff value of 38.1% significantly differentiated patients into 2 groups based on censored OS and into non- and intermediate-response categories based on time to progression. CONCLUSIONS These early differences suggest that SWI may be able to predict which patients would benefit most from similar combination therapies and may assist clinicians in making important decisions about patient care.

[1]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Phase II and pharmacogenomics study of enzastaurin plus temozolomide during and following radiation therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme and gliosarcoma. , 2011, Neuro-oncology.

[2]  B. Neyns,et al.  Phase II study of sunitinib malate in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma , 2011, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[3]  R. Greil,et al.  Clinical outcome with bevacizumab in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma treated outside clinical trials , 2011, Acta oncologica.

[4]  M S Brown,et al.  Patterns of progression in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab , 2011, Neurology.

[5]  Paul S Mischel,et al.  Phase II study of bevacizumab plus temozolomide during and after radiation therapy for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  R. McLendon,et al.  Phase II trial of bevacizumab and erlotinib in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. , 2010, Neuro-oncology.

[7]  M. Bredel,et al.  A phase 2 trial of single‐agent bevacizumab given in an every‐3‐week schedule for patients with recurrent high‐grade gliomas , 2010, Cancer.

[8]  B. Hughes,et al.  Carboplatin and etoposide combined with bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme , 2010, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[9]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Phase II trial of pazopanib (GW786034), an oral multi-targeted angiogenesis inhibitor, for adults with recurrent glioblastoma (North American Brain Tumor Consortium Study 06-02). , 2010, Neuro-oncology.

[10]  I. Christensen,et al.  Prospective evaluation of angiogenic, hypoxic and EGFR‐related biomarkers in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme treated with cetuximab, bevacizumab and irinotecan , 2010, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[11]  J. Hainsworth,et al.  Concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide followed by temozolomide and sorafenib in the first‐line treatment of patients with glioblastoma multiforme , 2010, Cancer.

[12]  E. Dósa,et al.  Treatment With Bevacizumab Plus Carboplatin for Recurrent Malignant Glioma , 2010, Neurosurgery.

[13]  P. Wen,et al.  Phase II study of cediranib, an oral pan-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  Alessia Pica,et al.  Phase I/IIa study of cilengitide and temozolomide with concomitant radiotherapy followed by cilengitide and temozolomide maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Enzastaurin plus temozolomide with radiation therapy in glioblastoma multiforme: a phase I study. , 2010, Neuro-oncology.

[16]  S. Hansen,et al.  Cetuximab, bevacizumab, and irinotecan for patients with primary glioblastoma and progression after radiation therapy and temozolomide: a phase II trial. , 2010, Neuro-oncology.

[17]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  W. Mason,et al.  Phase III study of enzastaurin compared with lomustine in the treatment of recurrent intracranial glioblastoma. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  H. Fine,et al.  A phase I/II trial of enzastaurin in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas. , 2010, Neuro-oncology.

[20]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  G. Jahng,et al.  Semiquantitative Assessment of Intratumoral Susceptibility Signals Using Non-Contrast-Enhanced High-Field High-Resolution Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging in Patients with Gliomas: Comparison with MR Perfusion Imaging , 2009, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[22]  Patrick Y Wen,et al.  End point assessment in gliomas: novel treatments limit usefulness of classical Macdonald's Criteria. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  GRAPPA-based susceptibility-weighted imaging of normal volunteers and patients with brain tumor at 7 T. , 2009, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[24]  P. Wen,et al.  An exploratory survival analysis of anti-angiogenic therapy for recurrent malignant glioma , 2009, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[25]  John A Butman,et al.  Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Randomized phase II study of cilengitide, an integrin-targeting arginine-glycine-aspartic acid peptide, in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  P. Wen,et al.  Response criteria for glioma , 2008, Nature Clinical Practice Oncology.

[28]  A. LaCasce,et al.  Enzastaurin , 2008, Expert opinion on investigational drugs.

[29]  A. Gregory Sorensen,et al.  Angiogenesis in brain tumours , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[30]  J. Vose,et al.  Phase II study of enzastaurin, a protein kinase C beta inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  Ricky T. Tong,et al.  Effect of vascular normalization by antiangiogenic therapy on interstitial hypertension, peritumor edema, and lymphatic metastasis: insights from a mathematical model. , 2007, Cancer research.

[32]  Darell D. Bigner,et al.  Phase II Trial of Bevacizumab and Irinotecan in Recurrent Malignant Glioma , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[33]  M. Weller,et al.  Synergistic antiglioma activity of radiotherapy and enzastaurin , 2007, Annals of neurology.

[34]  Rakesh K. Jain,et al.  Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angiogenic therapy: A new paradigm for combination therapy , 2001, Nature Medicine.

[35]  Erwin G. Van Meir,et al.  Glomeruloid microvascular proliferation orchestrated by VPF/VEGF: a new world of angiogenesis research. , 2001, The American journal of pathology.

[36]  P. Wesseling,et al.  Angiogenesis in brain tumors; pathobiological and clinical aspects , 1997, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[37]  J. Folkman,et al.  The role of angiogenesis in tumor growth. , 1992, Seminars in cancer biology.

[38]  T. Therneau,et al.  An Introduction to Recursive Partitioning Using the RPART Routines , 2015 .

[39]  Mei-Yin Polley,et al.  Assessment of perfusion MRI-derived parameters in evaluating and predicting response to antiangiogenic therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. , 2011, Neuro-oncology.

[40]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Using 7T susceptibility-weighted imaging to aid in the characterization of high-grade gliomas , 2008 .

[41]  Tracy T Batchelor,et al.  AZD2171, a pan-VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, normalizes tumor vasculature and alleviates edema in glioblastoma patients. , 2007, Cancer cell.

[42]  Douglas,et al.  Up-Regulation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression in a Rat Glioma Is Conferred by Two Distinct Hypoxia-driven Mechanisms' , 2006 .

[43]  Beverly A. Teicher,et al.  Antiangiogenic effects of a protein kinase Cβ-selective small molecule , 2001, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[44]  Colin Studholme,et al.  An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[45]  A Afeltra,et al.  Vascular endothelial growth factor: a key mediator of neoangiogenesis. A review. , 1997, European review for medical and pharmacological sciences.