Impression Management, Fairness, and the Employment Interview

This paper contends that impression management is not inherently a threat to fairness in employment interviews. Rather, regarding impression management as unfair is based on an outdated, narrow view of impression management as conscious, manipulative, and deceptive. A broader, expansive model of impression management is described which sees these behaviors as falling on a continuum from deceptive and manipulative on the one hand, to accurate, positive and beneficial on the other. While organizations may want to eliminate or discount the negative aspect of the impression management continuum, the ability to positively 'sell' oneself is often a desirable attribute both in the employment interview and in later on-the-job settings. This expansive view of impression management contends that organizations can make employment interviews more fair by: viewing impression management as a skill and not a deficit, training interviewers to be wary of manipulative and deceptive impression management, reducing the ambiguity and uncertainty of interview settings and increasing the verifiability of candidate responses by focusing the interview on a candidate's long-term identities and accomplishments rather than their short-term, spur-of-the-moment attempts to please the interviewer.

[1]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Impression management versus intrapsychic explanations in social psychology - a useful dichotomy , 1985 .

[2]  B. R. Schlenker Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations , 1980 .

[3]  R. Liden,et al.  INTERVIEWER AND APPLICANT BEHAVIORS IN EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEWS , 1993 .

[4]  Robert A. Giacalone,et al.  Applied Impression Management: How Image-Making Affects Managerial Decisions , 1991 .

[5]  Clive Fletcher,et al.  The Relationships Between Candidate Personality, Self-Presentation Strategies, and Interviewer Assessments in Selection Interviews: An Empirical Study , 1990 .

[6]  J. Tedeschi,et al.  Introduction to Social Psychology , 1985 .

[7]  Robert A. Giacalone,et al.  Impression management in the organization. , 1989 .

[8]  H. G. Baker,et al.  The Employment Interview: Guaranteed Improvement in Reliability , 1990 .

[9]  Catherine A. Riordan,et al.  Impression Management Theory and Diversity , 1994 .

[10]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Impression Management in the Job Interview , 1981 .

[11]  Gary J. Lautenschlager,et al.  Computer administration of questions: More desirable or more social desirability? , 1990 .

[12]  C. Fletcher Impression management in the selection inter-view , 1989 .

[13]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  Interpersonal Processes Involving Impression Regulation and Management , 1992 .

[14]  Gerald R. Ferris,et al.  Differential Effectiveness of Applicant Impression Management Tactics on Employment Interview Decisions1 , 1992 .

[15]  Robert A. Baron,et al.  Impression management by applicants during employment interviews: The "too much of a good thing" effect. , 1989 .

[16]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  Self-consciousness and self-presentation: Being autonomous versus appearing autonomous. , 1990 .

[17]  C. Fletcher Ethical issues in the selection interview , 1992 .

[18]  Gerald R. Ferris,et al.  The Effects of Applicant Impression Management Tactics on Interviewer Judgments , 1989 .

[19]  N. Anderson Decision Making in the Graduate Selection Interview: An Experimental Investigation , 1991 .

[20]  D. Alderton,et al.  Linking Diversity and Impression Management , 1994 .

[21]  Richard D. Arvey,et al.  Fairness in the selection of employees , 1992 .