Repairs as the last orderly provided defense of safety in aviation

Abstract We analyze the multi-dimensional organization of action in aviation, focusing on the repairs that derive from parties’ orientation to several sources of knowledge in which current information provides corrections for errors occurring earlier at the organizational and local levels. We suggest that the analysis of the coordination of talk and action can inform us about the multi-dimensional nature of the organization of action in complex environments. We note that repairs and corrections in naturally occurring activities inform participants and researchers about troubles that do not, however, cause incidents or accidents thanks to these corrective practices. The multi-dimensional organization of actions provides a number of corrective resources against emerging incidents. Our video-taped data comes from two environments, air traffic control centers and simulated Airbus flights, including more than 70 h of data in all. The sequential analysis of talk and action is based on conversation analysis (CA), ethnomethodology (EM), and ethnographic field work. The theoretical aims of the study concern the explication of organization of complex multimodal activities in which talk, action and technical resources are interwoven. In practical terms, the study aims at making the emergence and management of errors in complex activities transparent, providing a basis for improving safety procedures.

[1]  Ilkka Arminen,et al.  On the Context Sensitivity of Institutional Interaction , 2000 .

[2]  A. Schutz.  The phenomenology of the social world , 1967 .

[3]  E. Schegloff.  Repair After Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation , 1992, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  C. Goodwin.  Action and embodiment within situated human interaction , 2000 .

[5]  Margaret A. Hanson.  Contemporary Ergonomics 2001 , 2001 .

[6]  Luciano Gamberini,et al.  Situated Breakdown Analysis for the Evaluation of a Virtual Environment , 2002 .

[7]  Maurice Nevile,et al.  Making sequentiality salient: and-prefacing in the talk of airline pilots , 2006 .

[8]  Ilkka Arminen,et al.  Sequential order and sequence structure: the case of incommensurable studies on mobile phone calls , 2005 .

[9]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Attention: From Theory to Practice , 2006 .

[10]  Sandra A. Thompson,et al.  Interaction and grammar: Frontmatter , 1996 .

[11]  Sigrid Norris,et al.  Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework , 2004 .

[12]  A. J. Grimes.  Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies , 1985 .

[13]  E. Schegloff,et al.  The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation , 1977 .

[14]  Urs Bruegger,et al.  Global Microstructures: The Virtual Societies of Financial Markets1 , 2002, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  G. Button,et al.  Talk and Social Organisation , 1988 .

[16]  J. Porac,et al.  Cognition and Communication at Work , 1999 .

[17]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Practices of Seeing: Visual Analysis: An Ethnomethodological Approach , 2000 .

[18]  Lucy Suchman.  Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[19]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Cognition and communication at work: Seeing as situated activity: Formulating planes , 1996 .

[20]  C. Jewitt,et al.  The Handbook of Visual Analysis , 2000 .

[21]  G. Rochlin.  Trapped in the Net , 1997 .

[22]  Scott A. Shappell,et al.  APPLYING REASON: THE HUMAN FACTORS ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (HFACS) , 2001 .

[23]  David Francis,et al.  Directions in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis , 2005 .

[24]  R Weston,et al.  HUMAN FACTORS IN AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL , 1982 .

[25]  Scott A. Shappell,et al.  Human Error Perspectives in Aviation , 2001 .

[26]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design, Paul Luff, Jon Hindmarsh and Christian C. Heath (eds.) , 2000, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[27]  Ilkka Arminen,et al.  Institutional Interaction: Studies of Talk at Work , 2005 .

[28]  Petra Auvinen,et al.  Achievement of Intersubjectivity in Airline Cockpit Interaction , 2009 .

[29]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[30]  Emanuel A. Schegloff,et al.  The Relevance of Repair to Syntax-for-Conversation in Discourse and Syntax. , 1979 .

[31]  Maurice Nevile,et al.  Coordinating talk and non-talk activity in the airline cockpit , 2002 .

[32]  Angela Cora Garcia,et al.  The Interactional Organization of Computer Mediated Communication in the College Classroom , 1998 .

[33]  Mark S. Young,et al.  The Field Guide to Understanding Human Error , 2008 .

[34]  John Bowers,et al.  Studies in computer supported cooperative work: theory, practice and design , 1990 .

[35]  P. Drew.  'Open' class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation , 1997 .

[36]  Maurice Nevile,et al.  Using conversation analysis to represent and analyse recorded voice data , 2005 .

[37]  J. Shaoul.  Human Error , 1973, Nature.

[38]  K. Dismukes,et al.  Prospective Memory, Concurrent Task Management, and Pilot Error , 2007 .

[39]  Maurice Nevile,et al.  Beyond the Black Box: Talk-In-Interaction in the Airline Cockpit , 2004 .

[40]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[41]  Robin Wooffitt,et al.  Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications , 1998 .

[42]  Charles Goodwin,et al.  Seeing in Depth , 1995 .

[43]  Scott A. Shappell,et al.  The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System : HFACS : final report. , 2000 .

[44]  R. H. R. Harper,et al.  Rogues in the Air: An Ethnomethodology of 'Conflict' in Socially Organised Airspace , 1992 .

[45]  Paul ten Have,et al.  Understanding Qualitative Research and Ethnomethodology , 2004 .

[46]  Sidney Dekker,et al.  The Field Guide to Human Error Investigations , 2006 .

[47]  C. Heath,et al.  Technology in Action: ‘Interaction’ with computers in architecture , 2000 .

[48]  Maurice Nevile,et al.  Integrity in the Airline Cockpit: Embodying Claims About Progress for the Conduct of an Approach Briefing , 2004 .