Design and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure scale in acute pancreatitis: the PAN-PROMISE study

Objective This study aimed to develop and validate a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in acute pancreatitis (AP) as an endpoint centred on the patient. Design A PROM instrument (PAtieNt-rePoRted OutcoMe scale in acute pancreatItis, an international proSpEctive cohort study, PAN-PROMISE scale) was designed based on the opinion of patients, professionals and an expert panel. The scale was validated in an international multicentre prospective cohort study, describing the severity of AP and quality of life at 15 days after discharge as the main variables for validation. The COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments) methodology was applied. Both the design and validation stages considered the content and face validity of this new instrument; the metric properties of the different items, reliability (reproducibility and internal consistence), the construct, structural and criterion validity, responsiveness and interpretability of this scale. Results PAN-PROMISE consists of a seven-item scale based on the symptoms that cause the most discomfort and concern to patients with AP. The validation cohort involved 15 countries, 524 patients. The intensity of symptoms changed from higher values during the first 24 hours to lower values at discharge and 15 days thereafter. Items converged into a unidimensional ordinal scale with good fit indices. Internal consistency and split-half reliability at discharge were adequate. Reproducibility was confirmed using test–retest reliability and comparing the PAN-PROMISE score at discharge and 15 days after discharge. Evidence is also provided for the convergent-discriminant and empirical validity of the scale. Conclusion The PAN-PROMISE scale is a useful tool to be used as an endpoint in clinical trials, and to quantify patient well-being during the hospital admission and follow-up. Trial registration number NCT03650062

[1]  E. de-Madaria,et al.  Determinants of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis: A Nation-wide Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study. , 2019, Annals of surgery.

[2]  Jennifer L Lund,et al.  Burden and Cost of Gastrointestinal, Liver, and Pancreatic Diseases in the United States: Update 2018. , 2019, Gastroenterology.

[3]  Vikesh K. Singh,et al.  Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency Following Acute Pancreatitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2019, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[4]  L. B. Mokkink,et al.  COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study , 2018, Quality of Life Research.

[5]  A. Barkun,et al.  Initial Medical Treatment of Acute Pancreatitis: American Gastroenterological Association Institute Technical Review. , 2018, Gastroenterology.

[6]  Helen Lloyd,et al.  Patient-Reported Measures for Person-Centered Coordinated Care: A Comparative Domain Map and Web-Based Compendium for Supporting Policy Development and Implementation , 2018, Journal of medical Internet research.

[7]  Bechien U. Wu,et al.  Dynamic Measurement of Disease Activity in Acute Pancreatitis: The Pancreatitis Activity Scoring System , 2017, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[8]  J. Gervain,et al.  Prospective, Multicentre, Nationwide Clinical Data from 600 Cases of Acute Pancreatitis , 2016, PloS one.

[9]  John H Wasson,et al.  Patient reported outcome measures in practice , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  Vikesh K. Singh,et al.  Early factors associated with fluid sequestration and outcomes of patients with acute pancreatitis. , 2014, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[11]  Nick Black,et al.  Relationship between patient reported experience (PREMs) and patient reported outcomes (PROMs) in elective surgery , 2014, BMJ quality & safety.

[12]  J. Browne,et al.  The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative research , 2014, BMJ quality & safety.

[13]  Kathleen Puntillo,et al.  Thirst in critically ill patients: from physiology to sensation. , 2013, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[14]  Cathal Doyle,et al.  A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness , 2013, BMJ Open.

[15]  Colin D Johnson,et al.  Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus , 2012, Gut.

[16]  C. Terwee,et al.  The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[17]  A. Carr,et al.  The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  P. Harris,et al.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[19]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review. , 2006, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[20]  Nick Freemantle,et al.  Composite outcomes in randomized trials: greater precision but with greater uncertainty? , 2003, JAMA.

[21]  Wolzt,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2003, The Journal of the American College of Dentists.

[22]  C. Gluud,et al.  Would you trust a surrogate respondent? , 1997, The Lancet.

[23]  D. Osoba,et al.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[24]  R. Carter,et al.  Acute pancreatitis , 1988, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  E. Nelson,et al.  Functional health status levels of primary care patients. , 1983, JAMA.

[26]  Christiane,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2013, JAMA.

[27]  Christiane,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2004, Journal international de bioethique = International journal of bioethics.

[28]  W. Bechstein,et al.  [Acute pancreatitis]. , 2004, Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen.

[29]  A. Carr,et al.  Primary total hip replacement surgery: a systematic review of outcomes and modelling of cost-effectiveness associated with different prostheses. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[30]  M J Buxton,et al.  Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[31]  Colin M. MacLeod,et al.  Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents , 1949 .

[32]  D. Karnofsky The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer , 1949 .