Prostate cancer diagnosis: the feasibility of needle-based optical coherence tomography

Abstract. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of needle-based optical coherence tomography (OCT) and functional analysis of OCT data along the full pullback trajectory of the OCT measurement in the prostate, correlated with pathology. OCT images were recorded using a commercially available C7-XR™ OCT Intravascular Imaging System interfaced to a C7 Dragonfly™ intravascular 0.9-mm-diameter imaging probe. A computer program was constructed for automated image attenuation analysis. First, calibration of the OCT system for both the point spread function and the system roll-off was achieved by measurement of the OCT signal attenuation from an extremely weakly scattering medium (Intralipid® 0.0005 volume%). Second, the data were arranged in 31 radial wedges (pie slices) per circular segments consisting of 16 A-scans per wedge and 5 axial B-scans, resulting in an average A-scan per wedge. Third, the decay of the OCT signal is analyzed over 50 pixels (500  μm) in depth, starting from the first found maximum data point. Fourth, for visualization, the data were grouped with a corresponding color representing a specific μoct range according to their attenuation coefficient. Finally, the analyses were compared to histopathology. To ensure that each single use sterile imaging probe is comparable to the measurements of the other imaging probes, the probe-to-probe variations were analyzed by measuring attenuation coefficients of 0.03, 6.5, 11.4, 17, and 22.7 volume% Intralipid®. Experiments were repeated five times per probe for four probes. Inter- and intraprobe variation in the measured attenuation of Intralipid samples with scattering properties similar to that of the prostate was <8% of the mean values. Mean attenuation coefficients in the prostate were 3.8  mm−1 for parts of the tissue that were classified as benign (SD: 0.8  mm−1, minimum: 2.2  mm−1, maximum: 8.9  mm−1) and 4.1  mm−1 for parts of tissue that were classified as malignant (SD: 1.2  mm−1, minimum: 2.5  mm−1, maximum: 9.0  mm−1). In benign areas, the tissue looked homogeneous, whereas in malignant areas, small glandular structures were seen. However, not all areas in which a high attenuation coefficient became apparent corresponded to areas of prostate cancer. This paper describes the first in-tissue needle-based OCT imaging and three-dimensional optical attenuation analysis of prostate tissue that indicates a correlation with pathology. Fully automated attenuation coefficient analysis was performed at 1300 nm over the full pullback. Correlation with pathology was achieved by coregistration of three-dimensional (3-D) OCT attenuation maps with 3-D pathology of the prostate. This may contribute to the current challenge of prostate imaging and the rising interest in focal therapy for reduction of side effects occurring with current therapies.

[1]  Ton G van Leeuwen,et al.  Optical properties of neonatal skin measured in vivo as a function of age and skin pigmentation. , 2011, Journal of biomedical optics.

[2]  T. Jørgensen,et al.  Optical coherence tomography in dermatology , 2006 .

[3]  Qin Huang,et al.  Structural markers observed with endoscopic 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography correlating with Barrett's esophagus radiofrequency ablation treatment response (with videos). , 2012, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[4]  Shahab Chitchian,et al.  Segmentation of optical coherence tomography images for differentiation of the cavernous nerves from the prostate gland. , 2009, Journal of biomedical optics.

[5]  Benjamin Kaffenberger,et al.  The use of high resolution optical coherence tomography to evaluate robotic radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2009, International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology.

[6]  D. Bader,et al.  Scattering attenuation microscopy of oral epithelial dysplasia. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[7]  P. McCulloch The IDEAL recommendations and urological innovation , 2011, World Journal of Urology.

[8]  Timothy J Wilt,et al.  Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Ton G van Leeuwen,et al.  Volumetric in vivo visualization of upper urinary tract tumors using optical coherence tomography: a pilot study. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[10]  Heinz-Peter Schlemmer,et al.  Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance. , 2015, The Journal of urology.

[11]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[12]  Steven L. Jacques,et al.  Mapping Tissue Optical Attenuation to Identify Cancer Using Optical Coherence Tomography , 2009, MICCAI.

[13]  David W. Taggart,et al.  No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations , 2009, The Lancet.

[14]  D. Poppas,et al.  Nerve sparing ventral clitoroplasty preserves dorsal nerves in congenital adrenal hyperplasia. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[15]  T. H. van der Kwast,et al.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. , 2014, European urology.

[16]  Hashim Uddin Ahmed,et al.  Active surveillance and radical therapy in prostate cancer: can focal therapy offer the middle way? , 2008, World Journal of Urology.

[17]  T. Gambichler,et al.  Optical coherence tomography in dermatology: technical and clinical aspects , 2011, Archives of Dermatological Research.

[18]  M. Melamed,et al.  Appropriate patient selection in the focal treatment of prostate cancer: the role of transperineal 3-dimensional pathologic mapping of the prostate--a 4-year experience. , 2007, Urology.

[19]  Lars Egevad,et al.  Contemporary Grading for Prostate Cancer: Implications for Patient Care ☆ , 2013 .

[20]  M. Bhutani,et al.  Barrett's esophagus: current and future role of endosonography and optical coherence tomography. , 2004, Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

[21]  E. Brilakis,et al.  Optical coherence tomography evaluation of drug‐eluting stents , 2013, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[22]  Roxana Savastru,et al.  Optical techniques for the noninvasive diagnosis of skin cancer , 2013, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[23]  T. G. van Leeuwen,et al.  Quantitative comparison of the OCT imaging depth at 1300 nm and 1600 nm , 2010, Biomedical optics express.

[24]  Michael A Fiddy,et al.  Combined image-processing algorithms for improved optical coherence tomography of prostate nerves. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[25]  Pingkun Yan,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[26]  Dirk Faber,et al.  Functional optical coherence tomography : spatially resolved measurements of optical properties , 2005 .

[27]  A. Savitzky,et al.  Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures. , 1964 .

[28]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Imaging techniques for prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy , 2009, Nature Reviews Urology.

[29]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. , 2015, JAMA.

[30]  H. Lemij,et al.  Depth-resolved model-based reconstruction of attenuation coefficients in optical coherence tomography. , 2013, Biomedical optics express.

[31]  Soroush Rais-Bahrami,et al.  Optical coherence tomography of cavernous nerves: a step toward real-time intraoperative imaging during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. , 2008, Urology.

[32]  Freddy T. Nguyen,et al.  Optical coherence tomography: a review of clinical development from bench to bedside. , 2007, Journal of biomedical optics.

[33]  D. D. de Bruin,et al.  Optical phantoms of varying geometry based on thin building blocks with controlled optical properties. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[34]  S. Yun,et al.  High-speed optical frequency-domain imaging. , 2003, Optics express.

[35]  Dirk J. Faber,et al.  Measurement of the axial point spread function in scattering media using single-mode fiber-based optical coherence tomography , 2003 .

[36]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[37]  Andrew M. Rollins,et al.  Endoscopically guided spectral-domain OCT with double-balloon catheters , 2010, Optics express.

[38]  Ton G van Leeuwen,et al.  Quantitative measurement of attenuation coefficients of bladder biopsies using optical coherence tomography for grading urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[39]  Ton G van Leeuwen,et al.  Differentiation between normal renal tissue and renal tumours using functional optical coherence tomography: a phase I in vivo human study , 2012, BJU international.

[40]  Takahiko Suzuki,et al.  The Role of Optical Coherence Tomography in Coronary Intervention , 2012, The Korean journal of internal medicine.

[41]  T G van Leeuwen,et al.  Multiple and dependent scattering effects in Doppler optical coherence tomography. , 2010, Optics express.

[42]  Theo J M Ruers,et al.  Optical coherence tomography in vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia , 2012, Journal of biomedical optics.

[43]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Optical coherence tomography as a method for identifying benign and malignant microscopic structures in the prostate gland. , 2000, Urology.

[44]  G. Onik,et al.  Transperineal 3D mapping biopsy of the prostate: an essential tool in selecting patients for focal prostate cancer therapy. , 2008, Urologic oncology.

[45]  D. D. de Bruin,et al.  Three-dimensional optical coherence tomography evaluation of a left main bifurcation lesion treated with ABSORB® bioresorbable vascular scaffold including fenestration and dilatation of the side branch. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[46]  P. Choyke,et al.  Utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging suspicion levels for detecting prostate cancer. , 2013, The Journal of urology.