IT infusion within the audit process: Spreadsheet use in small audit firms

This study examines spreadsheet use during different phases of the audit process using a series of case studies on independent, local non-Big 4, audit firms in Thailand. Our study adopted the concept of infusion, i.e., the use of IT to its fullest potential within work processes. We used multiple data collection methods, including face-to-face interviews and the examination of commonly used spreadsheets. The study defined a way of measuring spreadsheet infusion in the audit process based on extended, integrative and emergent use. The data provides new insights into how spreadsheets are used by audit firms. Spreadsheet infusion varied considerably across the firms, which indicates significant opportunities for increased sophistication in spreadsheet use for some small audit firms. The study also identifies many enablers of spreadsheet infusion, including IT competence, IT champion, size and complexity of clients, external support, relative advantage and observability. In contrast, staff turnover, lack of partner support, and clients' willingness to provide soft copy data were noted as infusion inhibitors. By successfully extending infusion literature into the audit arena, this study provides a basis for studying the post-adoption behaviors associated with other applications of IT in auditing.

[1]  James Y. L. Thong,et al.  An Integrated Model of Information Systems Adoption in Small Businesses , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Vikki Lynn Saga,et al.  The nature and determinants of information technology infusion: An organizational level of analysis , 1994 .

[3]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Determinants of intranet diffusion and infusion , 2001 .

[4]  Ron Weber,et al.  The Impact of IT Infusion and Diffusion on Some Characteristics of IS Planning: A Model and an Empirical Test , 1995, ICIS.

[5]  Larry F. Konrath Auditing: A Risk Analysis Approach , 2001 .

[6]  Stewart A. Leech,et al.  Audit Support Systems and Decision Aids: Current Practice and Opportunities for Future Research , 2007 .

[7]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  An empirical study of spreadsheet error-finding performance , 1993 .

[8]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  A Comprehensive Conceptualization of Post-Adoptive Behaviors Associated with Information Technology Enabled Work Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[9]  M. Quaddus,et al.  An Investigation into the Factors Influencing the Adoption of B2B Trading Exchanges in Small Businesses in Western Australia , 2005, PACIS.

[10]  Donald S. Siegel,et al.  The Impact of Investment in IT on Economic Performance: Implications for Developing Countries , 2005 .

[11]  Mark Friedman,et al.  Excel macros to quicken SOX auditing , 2005 .

[12]  T. Jick Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[13]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Measuring technology incorporation/infusion , 1992 .

[14]  Yong Jin Kim,et al.  Differential effects of IT investments: Complementarity and effect of GDP level , 2008, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[15]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Post-Adoption Variations in Usage and Value of E-Business by Organizations: Cross-Country Evidence from the Retail Industry , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  E. Walker,et al.  What Success Factors are Important to Small Business Owners? , 2004 .

[17]  Stuart Manson,et al.  Audit Automation in the UK and the Us: A Comparative Study , 1998 .

[18]  Elaine G. Mauldin,et al.  Towards a meta-theory of accounting information systems , 1999 .

[19]  G. Susman,et al.  Advanced Manufacturing Technology and Organization Structure: Empowerment or Subordination? , 1992 .

[20]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[21]  Rajiv Kishore,et al.  Diffusion and Infusion: Two Dimensions of "Success of Adoption" of IS Innovations , 1998 .

[22]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Microcomputer applications: An empirical look at usage , 1989, Inf. Manag..

[23]  Colin B. Ferguson,et al.  The effect of transaction costs on the decision to replace ‘off‐the‐shelf’ software: the role of software diffusion and infusion , 2000, Inf. Syst. J..

[24]  Chee-Sing Yap,et al.  Top Management Support, External Expertise and Information Systems Implementation in Small Businesses , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Ritu Agarwal Individual Acceptance of Information Technologies , 2000 .

[26]  Dorothy G. Dologite,et al.  Achieving IT Infusion: A Conceptual Model for Small Businesses , 1999 .

[27]  Sarah E. Bonner A model of the effects of audit task complexity , 1994 .

[28]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[29]  B. Flyvbjerg Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[30]  C. McNair Proper compromises: The management control dilemma in public accounting and its impact on auditor behavior☆ , 1991 .

[31]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[32]  Raymond R. Panko,et al.  Revising the Panko-Halverson taxonomy of spreadsheet errors , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[33]  Stephen G. Powell,et al.  Impact of errors in operational spreadsheets , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[34]  Raymond R. Panko End user computing: management applications and technology , 1988 .

[35]  Diane J. Janvrin,et al.  An Examination of Audit Information Technology Use and Perceived Importance , 2008 .

[36]  Stephen D. Hart,et al.  Managing the Adoption of New Technologies: Does Personality Affect the Acceptance of New Audit Technologies? , 2009 .

[37]  Stephen G. Powell,et al.  A comparison of spreadsheet users with different levels of experience , 2009 .

[38]  Stephen G. Powell,et al.  A critical review of the literature on spreadsheet errors , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[39]  M. J. Fischer,et al.  "Real-izing" the benefits of new technologies as a source of audit evidence: An interpretive field study , 1996 .

[40]  T. H. Kwon,et al.  Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation , 1987 .

[41]  Shailendra C. Palvia,et al.  An examination of the IT satisfaction of small-business users , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[42]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Moving Beyond Intentions and Toward the Theory of Trying: Effects of Work Environment and Gender on Post-Adoption Information Technology Use , 2005, MIS Q..

[43]  Steven E. Kaplan,et al.  The effect of using diagnostic decision aids for analytical procedures on judges' liability judgments , 1995 .

[44]  Line Dubé,et al.  Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current Practices , 2003, MIS Q..

[45]  Pao-Long Chang,et al.  Organizational Changes for Advanced Manufacturing Technology Infusion: An Empirical Study , 2002 .

[46]  Stephen G. Powell,et al.  An auditing protocol for spreadsheet models , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[47]  Donald R. Herrmann,et al.  The Impact of the Asian Financial Crisis on Auditors' Conservatism , 2008 .

[48]  Trudie Aberdeen Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. , 2013, The Canadian Journal of Action Research.

[49]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Nature and Determinants of IT Acceptance, Routinization, and Infusion , 1993, Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology.

[50]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[51]  G. Prem Premkumar,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Research on Information Technology Implementation in Small Business , 2003, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..