Accuracy of T1 measurement in dynamic contrast‐enhanced breast MRI using two‐ and three‐dimensional variable flip angle fast low‐angle shot

In vivo T1 measurements, used to monitor the uptake of contrast agent by tissues, are typically performed as a first step in implementing compartmental analysis of contrast‐enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. We have extended previously described methodology for in vivo T1 measurement (using a variable flip‐angle gradient‐recalled echo technique) to two‐dimensional (2D), fast low‐angle shot (FLASH). This approach requires computational modeling of slice‐selective radiofrequency (RF) excitation to correct for nonrectangular slice profiles. The accuracy with which breast tissue T1 values can be measured by this approach is examined: T1 measurements from phantom and in vivo image data acquired with 2D and 3D FLASH imaging sequences are presented. Significant sources of error due to imaging pulse sequence quality and RF transmit field nonuniformity in the breast coil device that will have detrimental consequences for compartmental analysis are identified. Rigorous quality assurance programs with calibrated phantoms are thus recommended, to verify the accuracy with which T1 measurements are obtained. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1999;9:163–171. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Slice selection and T1 contrast in FLASH NMR imaging , 1988 .

[2]  S K Hilal,et al.  Radio frequency field intensity mapping using a composite spin-echo sequence. , 1990, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[3]  N J Pelc,et al.  Rapid calculation of T1 using variable flip angle gradient refocused imaging. , 1987, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[4]  T W Redpath,et al.  Measurement of spin-lattice relaxation times with FLASH for dynamic MRI of the breast. , 1996, The British journal of radiology.

[5]  B R Rosen,et al.  Selective Saturation NMR Imaging , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[6]  P S Tofts,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Gd‐DTPA Enhancement in Breast Tumors Using a Permeability Model , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  S. Riederer,et al.  Optimizing the precision in T1 relaxation estimation using limited flip angles , 1987, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  B R Rosen,et al.  Spin lattice relaxation time measurements in two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance imaging: corrections for plane selection and pulse sequence. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  M D Schnall,et al.  Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. , 1994, Radiology.

[10]  Paul S. Tofts,et al.  Standing Waves in Uniform Water Phantoms , 1994 .

[11]  T. Redpath Calibration of the Aberdeen NMR imager for proton spin-lattice relaxation time measurements in vivo , 1982 .

[12]  A Horsman,et al.  Quantitative analysis of multi‐slice Gd‐DTPA enhanced dynamic MR images using an automated simplex minimization procedure , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  John Homer,et al.  Driven-equilibrium single-pulse observation of T1 relaxation. A reevaluation of a rapid “new” method for determining NMR spin-lattice relaxation times , 1985 .

[14]  S. Heywang,et al.  MR imaging of the breast using gadolinium-DTPA. , 1986, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[15]  A R Padhani,et al.  Probing tumor microvascularity by measurement, analysis and display of contrast agent uptake kinetics , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  C-N. Chen,et al.  Biomedical magnetic resonance technology , 1989 .

[17]  Jens Frahm,et al.  Transverse coherence in rapid FLASH NMR imaging , 1987 .

[18]  M Recht,et al.  Method for the quantitative assessment of contrast agent uptake in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  M A Bernstein,et al.  A method for correctly setting the rf flip angle , 1989, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  C. Hardy,et al.  A review of 1H nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in pathology: are T1 and T2 diagnostic? , 1987, Medical physics.