Characterization, Modeling, and Statistical Analysis of the Electromagnetic Response of Inert Improvised Explosive Devices

The experimental characterization of the electromagnetic (EM) response of a set of inert improvised explosive devices (IEDs) is presented in this paper. The characterization is based on measurements of gain and input impedance of the firing circuits of inert IEDs in the range of 200 MHz to 2 GHz. First, a theoretical model to predict the average gain is developed. A comparison between the measurement results and theoretical predictions is presented. Then, the power delivered to a hot wire-based electro-explosive device connected to the inert IED is calculated for each measured case and it is statistically analyzed. The effects on the IED response of different characteristics of the coupling, such as the IED's elements, the incident field polarization, and the impedance mismatch, are also studied. In addition, the statistical performance of the induced power and current are determined and compared with the results of a numerical model based on Monte Carlo simulations. It is demonstrated that both approaches, a theoretical model based on an equivalent antenna and Monte Carlo simulations, can be used to describe the average EM response of the firing circuit of IEDs.

[1]  Nestor Pena,et al.  On the Electromagnetic Susceptibility of Hot Wire-Based Electroexplosive Devices to RF Sources , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[2]  S.R. Best,et al.  A Tutorial on the Receiving and Scattering Properties of Antennas , 2009, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine.

[3]  G. Gonzalez.  Microwave Transistor Amplifiers: Analysis and Design , 1984 .

[4]  S.R. Best,et al.  A discussion on the properties of electrically small self-resonant wire antennas , 2004, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine.

[5]  Fredrik Tufvesson,et al.  Mean effective gain of antennas in a wireless channel , 2009 .

[6]  H. B. Einstein,et al.  Mathematical Evaluation of Radio Frequency Hazards to Resistive Devices , 1965 .

[7]  Farhad Rachidi,et al.  Modeling of the electromagnetic coupling to electro-explosive devices , 2011, 2011 XXXth URSI General Assembly and Scientific Symposium.

[8]  Tapan K. Sarkar,et al.  A Novel technique to the solution of transient electromagnetic scattering from thin wires , 1986 .

[9]  E. Schamiloglu,et al.  Electromagnetic Modeling of Hot-Wire Detonators , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[10]  Farhad Rachidi,et al.  Susceptibility of Electro-explosive Devices to Microwave Interference , 2013 .

[11]  F. Rachidi,et al.  Wideband experimental characterization of differential antennas , 2012, 2012 6th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP).

[12]  J. Galuga,et al.  Induced currents on electric detonators for improvised explosive device pre-detonation , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[13]  Constantine A. Balanis,et al.  Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design , 1982 .

[14]  John L. Volakis,et al.  Antenna Engineering Handbook , 2007 .

[15]  John Jairo,et al.  A Study on the Electromagnetic Susceptibility of Improvised Explosive Devices , 2012 .

[16]  A. Molina,et al.  Humanitarian IED clearance in Colombia , 2008, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[17]  Nigel Heard,et al.  Measurements of the Field Strengths on Offshore Oil Platforms for Assessing Radio-Frequency Hazards with Electroexplosive Devices , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[18]  P. Knight,et al.  The safe use of electro-explosive devices in electromagnetic fields , 1984 .

[19]  T. Taga,et al.  Analysis for mean effective gain of mobile antennas in land mobile radio environments , 1990 .

[20]  S. Best,et al.  A discussion on the significance of geometry in determining the resonant behavior of fractal and other non-Euclidean wire antennas , 2003 .