The role of beliefs in teacher agency

There is an ongoing tension within educational policy worldwide between countries that seek to reduce the opportunities for teachers to exert judgement and control over their own work, and those who seek to promote it. Some see teacher agency as a weakness within the operation of schools and seek to replace it with evidence-based and data-driven approaches, whereas others argue that because of the complexities of situated educational practices, teacher agency is an indispensable element of good and meaningful education. While the ideological debate about the shape and form of teacher professionalism is important, it is equally important to understand the dynamics of teacher agency and the factors that contribute to its promotion and enhancement. In this paper, we draw from a two-year study into teacher agency against the backdrop of large-scale educational reform – the implementation of Scotland’s Curriculum for Excellence – in order to explore these questions. We focus on teachers’ beliefs in order to get a sense of the individual and collective discourses that inform teachers’ perceptions, judgements and decision-making and that motivate and drive teachers’ action. While the research suggests that beliefs play an important role in teachers’ work, an apparent mismatch between teachers’ individual beliefs and values and wider institutional discourses and cultures, and a relative lack of a clear and robust professional vision of the purposes of education indicate that the promotion of teacher agency does not just rely on the beliefs that individual teachers bring to their practice, but also requires collective development and consideration.

[1]  John Oversby,et al.  Teacher agency: an ecological approach , 2016 .

[2]  Mark Priestley,et al.  Teacher Agency: An Ecological Approach , 2015 .

[3]  Mark Priestley,et al.  Teacher Agency : What Is It and Why Does It Matter? , 2015 .

[4]  G. Biesta How Does a Competent Teacher Become a Good Teacher , 2015 .

[5]  M. Gorodetsky,et al.  Teachers and Teaching : theory and practice , 2015 .

[6]  G. Biesta How does a competent teacher become a good teacher? On judgement, wisdom and virtuosity in teaching and teacher education. , 2015 .

[7]  David Wray,et al.  Teaching theory and practice , 2014 .

[8]  Anneli Eteläpelto,et al.  What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work , 2013 .

[9]  R. Edwards,et al.  Teacher Agency in Curriculum Making: Agents of Change and Spaces for Manoeuvre , 2012 .

[10]  J. Pietarinen,et al.  Do comprehensive school teachers perceive themselves as active professional agents in school reforms? , 2012 .

[11]  S. Robinson,et al.  Understanding Teacher Agency: The Importance of Relationships , 2012 .

[12]  M. Priestley Whatever happened to curriculum theory? Critical realism and curriculum change , 2011 .

[13]  Carolyn S. Wallace,et al.  Teacher beliefs and the mediation of curriculum innovation in Scotland: A socio‐cultural perspective on professional development and change , 2011 .

[14]  Gert Biesta,et al.  Good Education in an Age of Measurement: Ethics, Politics, Democracy , 2010 .

[15]  Paulien C. Meijer,et al.  Understanding Teacher Learning in Secondary Education: The Relations of Teacher Activities to Changed Beliefs about Teaching and Learning. , 2009 .

[16]  G. Biesta What Kind of Citizen? What Kind of Democracy? Citizenship Education and the Scottish Curriculum for Excellence , 2008, Scottish Educational Review.

[17]  Margery D. Osborne,et al.  Complex positioning: teachers as agents of curricular and pedagogical reform , 2008 .

[18]  Mustafa Emirbayer What Is Agency ? ' , 2008 .

[19]  Gert Biesta,et al.  Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective , 2007 .

[20]  A. Vongalis-Macrow I, Teacher: re‐territorialization of teachers’ multi‐faceted agency in globalized education , 2007 .

[21]  B. Davies Subjectification: the relevance of Butler’s analysis for education , 2006 .

[22]  Gert Biesta,et al.  How is agency possible? Towards an ecological understanding of agency-as-achievement , 2006 .

[23]  B. Egan Professional Knowledge, Professional Lives , 2004 .

[24]  Joseph Kahne,et al.  Educating the “Good” Citizen: Political Choices and Pedagogical Goals , 2004, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[25]  E. Dunning,et al.  The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations , 2000 .

[26]  Mustafa Emirbayer,et al.  What Is Agency?1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[27]  Jonathan H. Turner,et al.  Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach.By Margaret S. Archer. Cambridge University Press, 354 pp , 1997 .

[28]  Helen Parke,et al.  Struggling to Promote Deeply Rooted Change: The "Filtering Effect" of Teachers' Beliefs on Understanding Transformational Views of Teaching Science , 1997 .

[29]  Pa Triggs,et al.  Policy into Practice and Practice into Policy: Creative Mediation in the Primary Classroom , 1997 .

[30]  M. Archer,et al.  Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach , 1997 .

[31]  J. Bransen The Philosophy of Social Science. An Introduction , 1996 .

[32]  F. Pignatelli What Can I Do? Foucault on Freedom and the Question of Teacher Agency. , 1993 .

[33]  M. Fullan Change Forces: Probing the Depths of Educational Reform. School Development and the Management of Change Series: 10. , 1993 .

[34]  M. Pajares,et al.  Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning Up a Messy Construct , 1992 .

[35]  F. Oser,et al.  Effective and Responsible Teaching: The New Synthesis. , 1992 .

[36]  J. Nespor The Role of Beliefs in the Practice of Teaching. , 1987 .

[37]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[38]  Norman M. Goble The changing role of the teacher , 1977 .

[39]  Norbert Elias,et al.  The Civilizing Process , 1939 .