Cost-effectiveness comparison of manual and on-line retrospective bibliographic searching

A study to compare the cost effectiveness of retrospective manual and on-line bibliographic searching is described. Forty search queries were processed against seven abstracting-indexing publications and the corresponding SDC/ORBIT data bases. Equivalent periods of coverage and searcher skill levels were used for both search models. Separate task times were measured for question analysis, searching, photocopying, shelving, and output distribution. Component costs were calculated for labor, information, reproduction, equipment, physical space, and telecommunications. Results indicate that on-line searching is generally faster, less costly, and more effective than manual searching. However, for certain query/information-source combinations, manual searching may offer some advantages in precision and turn-around time. The results of a number of related studies are reviewed.

[1]  D. R. Elchesen,et al.  General: Effectiveness of Combining Title Words and Index Terms in Machine Retrieval Searches , 1972, Nature.

[2]  H. F. Dammers.  The Economics of Computer - Based Information Systems: A Review. , 1975 .

[3]  Jay S. Buckley.  Planning for Effective Use of On-Line Systems , 1975, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[4]  Elizabeth Deas Gill,et al.  A Comparison of Manual and Computer Searches of the Chemical Evolution and Origin of Life Literature. , 1974 .

[5]  E Meyerhoff,et al.  Library participation in a Biomedical Communication and Information Network. , 1970, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[6]  F. W. Lancaster,et al.  Information retrieval: on-line , 1973 .

[7]  Jerry R. Byrne.  Relative effectiveness of titles, abstracts, and subject headings for machine retrieval from the COMPENDEX services , 1975, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[8]  E. C. Goodliffe,et al.  On‐line information retrieval: some comments on the use of Retrospec 1 in an industrial library , 1974 .

[9]  P. H. Vickers.  A COST SURVEY OF MECHANIZED INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 1973 .

[10]  Joseph Santodonato.  A Comparison of On-Line and Manual Modes in Searching Chemical Abstracts for Specific Compounds , 1976, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[11]  Paladugu VJones Carole B Rao.  System to manage reserve texts (SMART) , 1976 .

[12]  F. W. Lancaster.  The cost‐effectiveness analysis of information retrieval and dissemination systems , 1971 .

[13]  G. K. Thompson.  Some cost estimates for bibliographical searching in a large-scale social sciences information system , 1970, Inf. Storage Retr..

[14]  Robert E. Buntrock.  Searching Chemical Abstracts vs. CA Condensates , 1975, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[15]  Barry K. Wyatt,et al.  Report on the evaluation of an experimental computer-based current-awareness service for chemists , 1972, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[16]  G. Olive,et al.  STUDIES TO COMPARE RETRIEVAL USING TITLES WITH THAT USING INDEX TERMS , 1973 .

[17]  C. J. Michaels.  Searching CA Condensates On-Line vs. the CA Keyword Indexes , 1975, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[18]  Inge Berg Hansen,et al.  CA Condensates as a retrospective search tool : A commentary , 1973, Inf. Storage Retr..