The role of future time perspective in career decision-making

Abstract The present study of two hundred and seven university students examined the structural relation of future-orientation (both valence and instrumentality), career decision-making self-efficacy and career indecision (choice/commitment anxiety and lack of readiness) in a sample of 218 college students. Future time perspective was viewed as a key input to career decision making. Structural equation modeling results indicated that valence was not significantly related to career decision-making self-efficacy, choice/commitment anxiety and lack of readiness. However, instrumentality completely mediated the relation between valence and career decision-making self-efficacy, choice/commitment anxiety and lack of readiness. Instrumentality was significantly related to career decision-making self-efficacy and lack of readiness. Career decision-making self-efficacy completely mediated the relation between instrumentality and choice/commitment anxiety; however, it only partially mediated the relation between instrumentality and lack of readiness. Although the proposed model was invariant across gender, the findings indicated that women reported higher instrumentality and lower lack of readiness than did men. No differences were found for career decision-making self-efficacy and choice/commitment anxiety across gender. The findings suggest that psychologists, counselors, and teachers should consider the role of future time perspective in university students' career development.

[1]  Jenefer Husman,et al.  The role of the future in student motivation , 1999 .

[2]  Willy Lens,et al.  How to Combine Intrinsic Task-Motivation with the Motivational Effects of the Instrumentality of Present Tasks for Future Goals , 2001 .

[3]  Willy Lens,et al.  Placing Motivation and Future Time Perspective Theory in a Temporal Perspective , 2004 .

[4]  P. Shrout,et al.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[5]  Barbara A. Greene,et al.  Gender and Orientations Toward the Future: Links to Motivation , 2004 .

[6]  D. McInerney,et al.  Educational Psychology: Constructing Learning , 2008 .

[7]  P. Shrout,et al.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[8]  Jenefer Husman,et al.  The Multivariate Dimensionality of Personal Control and Future Time Perspective Beliefs in Achievement and Self-Regulation. , 2001, Contemporary educational psychology.

[9]  P. Creed,et al.  Cross-Cultural Equivalence of the Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form: An Australian and South African Comparison , 2002 .

[10]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[11]  Gregory R. Hancock,et al.  Structural equation modeling methods of hypothesis testing of latent variable means. , 1997 .

[12]  P. Creed,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of career decisional states in adolescence , 2005 .

[13]  T. Little,et al.  To Parcel or Not to Parcel: Exploring the Question, Weighing the Merits , 2002 .

[14]  P. Bentler.  Fit Indexes, Lagrange Multipliers, Constraint Changes and Incomplete Data in Structural Models. , 1990, Multivariate behavioral research.

[15]  Gerard J. Fogarty,et al.  Time Discounting in Relation to Career Preferences , 2001 .

[16]  J. Pizzolato.  Impossible Selves , 2007 .

[17]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[18]  Robert W. Lent,et al.  Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. , 2000 .

[19]  Steven D. Brown,et al.  Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance , 1994 .

[20]  Steven D. Brown,et al.  Validation of a Four-Factor Model of Career Indecision , 2012 .

[21]  S. Maxwell,et al.  Implications of Recent Developments in Structural Equation Modeling for Counseling Psychology , 1999 .

[22]  J. Nurmi.  How do adolescents see their future? A review of the development of future orientation and planning , 1991 .

[23]  D. Super.  A life-span, life-space approach to career development , 1980 .

[24]  A. Panter,et al.  Writing about structural equation models. , 1995 .

[25]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[26]  Willy Lens,et al.  Academic Achievement and Future Time Perspective as a Cognitive-Motivational Concept , 1982 .

[27]  Jenefer Husman,et al.  AC 2007-3040: VALIDATING MEASURES OF FUTURE TIME PERSPECTIVE FOR ENGINEERING STUDENTS: STEPS TOWARD IMPROVING ENGINEERING EDUCATION , 2007 .

[28]  M. Savickas,et al.  Effectiveness of a Career Time Perspective Intervention , 1998 .

[29]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Time perspective in vocational maturity and career decision making , 1984 .

[30]  D. Shell,et al.  Beliefs and perceptions about the future: A measurement of future time perspective , 2008 .

[31]  Julius Kuhl,et al.  Trends and prospects in motivation research , 2001 .

[32]  Nancy E. Betz,et al.  Evaluation of a Short Form of the Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale , 1996 .

[33]  D. McInerney,et al.  A Discussion of Future Time Perspective , 2004 .

[34]  L. Nota,et al.  Time perspective and indecision in young and older adolescents , 2010 .