Time effects of climate change mitigation strategies for second generation biofuels and co-products with temporary carbon storage

Second generation biofuels offer a means of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and storing or delaying soil carbon emissions relative to petroleum-based fuels depending upon the strategy used to synthesize the biofuel and co-products. Unless mitigated, the soil organic carbon and nitrogen loss resulting from removing agricultural residues for biofuel production may cause life cycle greenhouse gas emissions to surpass national policy thresholds, and thus risk non-compliance with renewable fuel policy. Strategies to mitigate soil organic carbon loss such as using nutrient and carbon-rich, and stable land amendments will lead to time-variable greenhouse gas credits. Recent studies have argued for using time-dependent rather than time-averaged radiative forcing methods for biofuel greenhouse gas accounting but few life cycle assessment studies have examined the impact of time-varying emissions of soil organic carbon using the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change tier 3 models. This study applies a time-dependent radiative forcing approach to a 100-year time-series data set of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions for lignocellulosic ethanol that includes temporally variable soil greenhouse gas emissions. This study demonstrates that averaging soil emissions and neglecting the time when the sequestration or release occurs within a selected time horizon can lead to a 9% to over 80% overestimation of the magnitude of the effect of the mitigation strategy. This affirms that employing strategies to maintain soil organic carbon stock early within a biofuel program supports climate change mitigation. Such strategies would guide farmers to best manage soil carbon within the biofuel production life cycle. Time-dependent approaches underscore the need for early measures of greenhouse gas curtailment to support sustainable renewable biofuel and agricultural policy.

[1]  T. Lenton Early warning of climate tipping points , 2011 .

[2]  Pascal Lesage,et al.  Biogenic Carbon and Temporary Storage Addressed with Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment , 2013 .

[3]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Global climate impacts of forest bioenergy: what, when and how to measure? , 2013 .

[4]  Kelly N. Ibsen,et al.  Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Corn Stover , 2002 .

[5]  A. Stromman,et al.  Global climate impacts of forest bioenergy: what, when and how to measure? , 2013 .

[6]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Energy and CO2 analysis of wood substitution in construction , 2011 .

[7]  R. Rosenbaum,et al.  Using the Lashof Accounting Methodology to Assess Carbon Mitigation Projects With Life Cycle Assessment , 2010 .

[8]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Time-dependent radiative forcing effects of forest fertilization and biomass substitution , 2012, Biogeochemistry.

[9]  H. MacLean,et al.  Implications of emissions timing on the cost‐effectiveness of greenhouse gas mitigation strategies: application to forest bioenergy systems , 2014 .

[10]  M. Kirschbaum,et al.  The temperature dependence of soil organic matter decomposition, and the effect of global warming on soil organic C storage , 1995 .

[11]  A. Moraes,et al.  Soil improvement and mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions for integrated crop-livestock systems: case study assessment in the Pantanal savanna highland, Brazil. , 2015 .

[12]  Jessika E. Trancik,et al.  Climate impacts of energy technologies depend on emissions timing , 2014 .

[13]  S. Polasky,et al.  Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt , 2008, Science.

[14]  B. Dale,et al.  Biofuels, land use change, and greenhouse gas emissions: some unexplored variables. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  R. Heijungs,et al.  A novel life cycle impact assessment method on biomass residue harvesting reckoning with loss of biomass productivity , 2014 .

[16]  R. Lal Soil Carbon Management and Climate Change , 2013 .

[17]  Alissa Kendall,et al.  Proper accounting for time increases crop-based biofuels’ greenhouse gas deficit versus petroleum , 2009 .

[18]  Per-Anders Hansson,et al.  Ethanol production in biorefineries using lignocellulosic feedstock - GHG performance, energy balance and implications of life cycle calculation methodology. , 2014 .

[19]  Philip M. Fearnside,et al.  Accounting for time in Mitigating Global Warming through land-use change and forestry , 2000 .

[20]  Jane M. F. Johnson,et al.  Corn Stover to Sustain Soil Organic Carbon Further Constrains Biomass Supply , 2007 .

[21]  W Michael Griffin,et al.  Relevance of emissions timing in biofuel greenhouse gases and climate impacts. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  W. Parton,et al.  Integrating biorefinery and farm biogeochemical cycles offsets fossil energy and mitigates soil carbon losses. , 2015, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[23]  S. Goddard,et al.  Biofuels from crop residue can reduce soil carbon and increase CO 2 emissions , 2014 .

[24]  Michael Z. Hauschild,et al.  Need for relevant timescales when crediting temporary carbon storage , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[25]  Francesco Cherubini,et al.  Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations , 2009 .

[26]  M. Margni,et al.  Considering time in LCA: dynamic LCA and its application to global warming impact assessments. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  Pekka Leskinen,et al.  Current limits of life cycle assessment framework in evaluating environmental sustainability – case of two evolving biofuel technologies , 2013 .

[28]  Richard J. Murphy,et al.  Energy and greenhouse gas balance of the use of forest residues for bioenergy production in the UK. , 2011 .

[29]  R. Betts,et al.  Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. Chapter 2 , 2007 .

[30]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[31]  A. McAloon,et al.  Cost and greenhouse gas emission tradeoffs of alternative uses of lignin for second generation ethanol , 2013 .

[32]  Annette Cowie,et al.  Does Soil Carbon Loss in Biomass Production Systems Negate the Greenhouse Benefits of Bioenergy? , 2006 .

[33]  Brenda Chang,et al.  Accounting for time-dependent effects in biofuel life cycle greenhouse gas emissions calculations. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  Anselm Eisentraut,et al.  Sustainable Production of Second-Generation Biofuels: Potential and Perspectives in Major Economies and Developing Countries , 2010 .

[35]  Kurt Kleiner,et al.  The backlash against biofuels , 2008 .

[36]  R. Lal Crop residues as soil amendments and feedstock for bioethanol production. , 2008, Waste management.

[37]  S. Davis,et al.  Changes in soil organic carbon under biofuel crops , 2008 .

[38]  Charles A. Mullen,et al.  Life Cycle Environmental and Economic Tradeoffs of Using Fast Pyrolysis Products for Power Generation , 2013 .

[39]  B. M. Petersen,et al.  An approach to include soil carbon changes in life cycle assessments , 2013 .

[40]  W. Voorhees,et al.  Characterization of Soil Amended with the By‐Product of Corn Stover Fermentation , 2004 .

[41]  Francesco Cherubini,et al.  Crop residues as raw materials for biorefinery systems - A LCA case study , 2010 .

[42]  Heather L MacLean,et al.  Life cycle evaluation of emerging lignocellulosic ethanol conversion technologies. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[43]  Heather L. MacLean,et al.  The contribution of enzymes and process chemicals to the life cycle of ethanol , 2009 .

[44]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Corn Stover Removal for Expanded Uses Reduces Soil Fertility and Structural Stability , 2009 .

[45]  Ryan Davis,et al.  Process Design and Economics for Biochemical Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol: Dilute-Acid Pretreatment and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Corn Stover , 2011 .

[46]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Temperature and soil organic matter decomposition rates – synthesis of current knowledge and a way forward , 2011 .

[47]  W. Parton,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of net greenhouse-gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[48]  Alissa Kendall,et al.  Time-adjusted global warming potentials for LCA and carbon footprints , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.