E-tail Product Return Prediction via Hypergraph-based Local Graph Cut

Recent decades have witnessed the rapid growth of E-commerce. In particular, E-tail has provided customers with great convenience by allowing them to purchase retail products anywhere without visiting the actual stores. A recent trend in E-tail is to allow free shipping and hassle-free returns to further attract online customers. However, a downside of such a customer-friendly policy is the rapidly increasing return rate as well as the associated costs of handling returned online orders. Therefore, it has become imperative to take proactive measures for reducing the return rate and the associated cost. Despite the large amount of data available from historical purchase and return records, up until now, the problem of E-tail product return prediction has not attracted much attention from the data mining community. To address this problem, in this paper, we propose a generic framework for E-tail product return prediction named HyperGo . It aims to predict the customer's intention to return after s/he has put together the shopping basket. For the baskets with a high return intention, the E-tailers can then take appropriate measures to incentivize the customer not to issue a return and/or prepare for reverse logistics. The proposed HyperGo is based on a novel hypergraph representation of historical purchase and return records, effectively leveraging the rich information of basket composition. For a given basket, we propose a local graph cut algorithm using truncated random walk on the hypergraph to identify similar historical baskets. Based on these baskets, HyperGo is able to estimate the return intention on two levels: basket-level vs. product-level, which provides the E-tailers with detailed information regarding the reason for a potential return (e.g., duplicate products with different colors). One major benefit of the proposed local algorithm lies in its time complexity, which is linearly dependent on the size of the output cluster and polylogarithmically dependent on the volume of the hypergraph. This makes HyperGo particularly suitable for processing large-scale data sets. The experimental results on multiple real-world E-tail data sets demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of HyperGo .

[1]  Hung-Khoon Tan,et al.  Modeling video hyperlinks with hypergraph for web video reranking , 2008, ACM Multimedia.

[2]  Abdelghani Bellaachia,et al.  Random Walks in Hypergraph , 2021, International Journal of Education and Information Technologies.

[3]  Martine D. F. Schlag,et al.  Multi-level spectral hypergraph partitioning with arbitrary vertex sizes , 1996, Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Aided Design.

[4]  J. Rodríguez On the Laplacian Spectrum and Walk-regular Hypergraphs , 2003 .

[5]  Dennis M. Wilkinson,et al.  Large-Scale Parallel Collaborative Filtering for the Netflix Prize , 2008, AAIM.

[6]  Martine D. F. Schlag,et al.  Multi-level spectral hypergraph partitioning with arbitrary vertex sizes , 1996, Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Aided Design.

[7]  Tao Li,et al.  News recommendation via hypergraph learning: encapsulation of user behavior and news content , 2013, WSDM.

[8]  Shang-Hua Teng,et al.  A Local Clustering Algorithm for Massive Graphs and Its Application to Nearly Linear Time Graph Partitioning , 2008, SIAM J. Comput..

[9]  Fan Chung Graham,et al.  Local Partitioning for Directed Graphs Using PageRank , 2007, Internet Math..

[10]  Yada Zhu,et al.  Local Algorithm for User Action Prediction Towards Display Ads , 2017, KDD.

[11]  Fan Chung Graham,et al.  Local Graph Partitioning using PageRank Vectors , 2006, 2006 47th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'06).

[12]  Harrison Hyung Min Kim,et al.  Predictive Model Selection for Forecasting Product Returns , 2016 .

[13]  Lutz Kolbe,et al.  Predicting Product Returns in E-Commerce: The Contribution of Mahalanobis Feature Extraction , 2015, ICIS.

[14]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Learning with Hypergraphs: Clustering, Classification, and Embedding , 2006, NIPS.

[15]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Beyond pairwise clustering , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[17]  Balaraman Ravindran,et al.  Extended Discriminative Random Walk: A Hypergraph Approach to Multi-View Multi-Relational Transductive Learning , 2015, IJCAI.

[18]  Allen Kent,et al.  Machine literature searching X. Machine language; factors underlying its design and development , 1955 .