Limits to water transport in Juniperus osteosperma and Pinus edulis: implications for drought tolerance and regulation of transpiration

1. An air-injection method was used to study loss of water transport capacity caused by xylem cavitation in roots and branches of Pinus edulis (Colorado Pinyon) and Juniperus osteosperma (Utah Juniper). These two species characterize the Pinyon–Juniper communities of the high deserts of the western United States. Juniperus osteosperma can grow in drier sites than P. edulis and is considered the more drought tolerant. 2.Juniperus osteosperma was more resistant to xylem cavitation than P. edulis in both branches and roots. Within a species, branches were more resistant to cavitation than roots for P. edulis but no difference was seen between the two organs for J. osteosperma. There was also no difference between juveniles and adults in J. osteosperma; this comparison was not made for P. edulis. 3. Tracheid diameter was positively correlated with xylem cavitation pressure across roots and stems of both species. This relation suggests a trade-off between xylem conductance and resistance to xylem cavitation in these species. 4. During summer drought, P. edulis maintained higher predawn xylem pressures and showed much greater stomatal restriction of transpiration, consistent with its greater vulnerability to cavitation, than J. osteosperma. 5. These results suggest that the relative drought tolerance of P. edulis and J. osteosperma results in part from difference in their vulnerability to xylem cavitation.

[1]  J. Sperry,et al.  Xylem cavitation in roots and stems of Douglas-fir and white fir. , 1997, Tree physiology.

[2]  U. Hacke,et al.  Drought-Induced Xylem Dysfunction in Petioles, Branches, and Roots of Populus balsamifera L. and Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn , 1996, Plant physiology.

[3]  John S. Sperry,et al.  Intra‐ and inter‐plant variation in xylem cavitation in Betula occidentalis , 1994 .

[4]  S. Davis,et al.  Biophysical Perspectives of Xylem Evolution: is there a Tradeoff of Hydraulic Efficiency for Vulnerability to Dysfunction? , 1994 .

[5]  K. Lajtha,et al.  Plant Spatial Pattern and Nutrient Distribution in Pinyon-Juniper Woodlands Along an Elevational Gradient in Northern New Mexico , 1992, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[6]  M. Tyree,et al.  Use of positive pressures to establish vulnerability curves : further support for the air-seeding hypothesis and implications for pressure-volume analysis. , 1992, Plant physiology.

[7]  H. Cochard,et al.  Vulnerability of several conifers to air embolism. , 1992, Tree physiology.

[8]  Park S. Nobel,et al.  Physicochemical and Environmental Plant Physiology , 1991 .

[9]  P. Nobel,et al.  CHAPTER 9 – Plants and Fluxes , 1991 .

[10]  Melvin T. Tyree,et al.  Water‐stress‐induced xylem embolism in three species of conifers , 1990 .

[11]  M. Hipkins,et al.  Gas penetration of pit membranes in the xylem of Rhododendron as the cause of acoustically detectable sap cavitation , 1985 .

[12]  M. Zimmermann.  Xylem Structure and the Ascent of Sap , 1983, Springer Series in Wood Science.

[13]  A. A. Lindsey,et al.  Juniper‐Pinyon East of the Continental Divide, as Analyzed by the Line‐Strip Method , 1954 .

[14]  A. M. Woodbury.  Distribution of Pigmy Conifers in Utah and Northeastern Arizona , 1947 .