Effects of decision criterion on response latencies of binary decisions

The effects of decision criterion on response latencies of binary decisions were examined. The stimuli comprised two, partly overlapping, “normal” distributions of either two-digit numbers or tonal frequencies. Individual stimuli were randomly sampled from the distributions, and subjects had to decide from which distribution the stimulus was sampled. The decision goal was to maximize the expected gain using three different payoff matrices. Decision latencies with and without prior knowledge of optimal decision criteria were measured. In a control task, subjects were asked only to label stimuli as being either above or below the optimal criteria (without regard for a posteriori probabilities or expected gain). The relation between criterion and latency was examined by means of a trial-by-trial analysis of the stimuli and the responses. Response latency was inversely related both to the distance between the stimulus and the decision criterion and to the probability of the response elicited by the stimulus. Response latencies showed a maximum at the criterion in all conditions. These results were obtained with different stimulus modalities (tones or numbers), different discriminability levels within the auditory modality, and ifferent decision tasks. It is proposed that the decision criterion is the primary determinant of response latencies of binary decisions.

[1]  W. J. McGill.  Neural counting mechanisms and energy detection in audition , 1967 .

[2]  G A Gescheider,et al.  Reaction time in the detection of vibrotactile signals. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Deterministic vs probabilistic strategies in detection , 1971 .

[4]  T. Marill.  Detection theory and psychophysics , 1956 .

[5]  Charles S. Watson,et al.  Response latency, confidence, and ROCs in auditory signal detection , 1972 .

[6]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[7]  David Navon,et al.  A simple method for latency analysis in signal detection tasks , 1975 .

[8]  R. Sekuler.  SIGNAL DETECTION, CHOICE RESPONSE TIMES, AND VISUAL BACKWARD MASKING. , 1965, Canadian journal of psychology.

[9]  R. Ratcliff.  Theoretical interpretations of the speed and accuracy of positive and negative responses. , 1985, Psychological review.

[10]  D. Dorfman,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory—A direct solution , 1968, Psychometrika.

[11]  R J AUDLEY,et al.  A stochastic model for individual choice behavior. , 1960, Psychological review.

[12]  S. Link.  Modeling imageless thought: The relative judgment theory of numerical comparisons ☆ , 1990 .

[13]  R. Pike.  Response latency models for signal detection. , 1973, Psychological review.

[14]  Jerome L. Myers,et al.  Implications of latency data for threshold and nonthreshold models of signal detection , 1972 .

[15]  Douglas Vickers,et al.  Discriminating between the frequency of occurrence of two alternative events , 1971 .

[16]  M. V. Rhoades,et al.  On the Reduction of Choice Reaction Times with Practice , 1959 .

[17]  M. Stone.  Models for choice-reaction time , 1960 .

[18]  R. Ratcliff.  More on the speed and accuracy of positive and negative responses. , 1987, Psychological review.

[19]  W. Edwards.  Optimal strategies for seeking information: Models for statistics, choice reaction times, and human information processing ☆ , 1965 .

[20]  W. Lee,et al.  CATEGORIZING EXTERNALLY DISTRIBUTED STIMULUS SAMPLES FOR THREE CONTINUA. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  Ewart A. C. Thomas.  Sufficient Conditions for Monotone Hazard Rate An Application to Latency-Probability Curves , 1971 .

[22]  D. Vickers.  Decision processes in visual perception , 1979 .

[23]  D. LaBerge.  A recruitment theory of simple behavior , 1962 .

[24]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Strength theory of decision rules and latency in retrieval from short-term memory , 1969 .

[25]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Speed and accuracy of same and different responses in perceptual matching , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  R. Nickerson.  ‘Same’-‘different’ response times: A model and a preliminary test , 1969 .

[27]  Philip Twitchell Smith,et al.  COST, DISCRIMINABILITY AND RESPONSE BIAS , 1968 .

[28]  D. Bindra,et al.  Judgments of Sameness and Difference: Experiments on Decision Time , 1965, Science.

[29]  John H. Wright,et al.  Reaction time as a function of the intensity and probability of occurrence of vibrotactile signals , 1969 .

[30]  M. P. Friedman,et al.  Reaction-time distributions in the detection of weak signals in noise. , 1965, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.