This paper assesses the accessibility of the websites of the National Library of Australia, and those of each of the State/Territory Libraries. The analysis has been conducted using expert manual evaluation, automated tools and users with disabilities to identify both the Web Content Accessibility Guideline (WCAG) Version 2 compliance as well as the chief accessibility barriers identified by users with disabilities. While the results from the different aspects of the hybrid testing methods differ considerably in their ranking, the quantitative data suggest that at the time of writing, none of the libraries assessed meet WCAG 2.0 Level A compliance. Unfortunately, it follows that people with disabilities would have problems accessing materials from the websites of all of the nine libraries tested. In view of the fact that one in five people have a disability that places restrictions on their mobility, employment and/or education, this is understandably significant. Despite the issue of non-compliance, however, many libraries had clearly considered and implemented elements of WCAG 2.0 and would only require minimal improvements to reach the web standard, while others have considerable work to do before they meet the required inclusive website design advocated by both Australian and international standards.
[1]
Vivienne Conway.
Website accessibility in Western Australian public libraries
,
2011
.
[2]
Constantine Stephanidis,et al.
Universal access in the information society
,
1999,
HCI.
[3]
長瀬 修.
わかりやすい障害者の権利条約 : 知的障害のある人の権利のために = Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities
,
2009
.
[4]
Yeliz Yesilada,et al.
The Expertise Effect on Web Accessibility Evaluation Methods
,
2011,
Hum. Comput. Interact..
[5]
Helen Petrie,et al.
Remote usability evaluations With disabled people
,
2006,
CHI.
[6]
Jennifer Mankoff,et al.
Is your web page accessible?: a comparative study of methods for assessing web page accessibility for the blind
,
2005,
CHI.
[7]
Giorgio Brajnik,et al.
Comparing accessibility evaluation tools: a method for tool effectiveness
,
2004,
Universal Access in the Information Society.