Impact of different internal convection control strategies in a non-evacuated CPC collector performance

Abstract Over the last decade the technological advances observed in solar collector materials, namely better spectrally selective absorber coatings and ultra clear glass covers, contribute to performance improvements and translate into higher operational temperature ranges with higher efficiency values. While the use of Evacuated Tube Collectors (ETCs) is becoming widespread in the thermal conversion of solar energy, non-evacuated solar collectors still hold advantages at manufacturing, reliability and/or cost levels, making them interesting and competitive for a large range of applications, in particularly, in temperature ranges up to 80 °C. However, these advantages have not prevented the major drawback of these collectors when compared to ETCs: thermal losses due to internal convection which prevent their general use in the range of operating temperatures up to 150 °C. Insulation, double glazing or selective coatings can be used in non-evacuated collectors to reduce heat losses. To prevent internal convection losses in these solar collectors, different control strategies have been studied, such as the adoption of different inert gases within the collector cavity, physical barriers reducing air flow velocities over the absorber or cover surfaces or the use of concentration. In the present article, an assessment of adopting such internal convection control strategies in a CPC collector is presented. Each of the presented strategies is assessed in terms of the resulting collector optical and thermal characterization parameters and yearly collector yield. For this purpose, an integrated tool allowing the design, optical and thermal characterization of CPC collectors was developed. The results obtained provide valuable guidelines for anyone wishing to implement any of these strategies in a new collector design.

[1]  W. R. McIntire.  Factored approximations for biaxial incident angle modifiers , 1982 .

[2]  Jeffrey M. Gordon,et al.  Economic Optimization of Stationary Nonevacuated CPC Solar Collectors , 1987 .

[3]  S. Saravanan,et al.  Buoyancy convection in a cavity with mutually orthogonal heated plates , 2008, Comput. Math. Appl..

[4]  Aerogel and krypton insulated evacuated flat-plate collector for process heat production , 1996 .

[5]  S. Abdel-Khalik,et al.  Natural Convection In Compound Parabolic Concentrators—A Finite-Element Solution , 1978 .

[6]  Jan-Olof Dalenbäck,et al.  Thermal performance of gas-filled flat plate solar collectors , 2009 .

[7]  N. Benz,et al.  HIGH EFFICIENCY EVACUATED FLAT-PLATE SOLAR COLLECTOR FOR PROCESS STEAM PRODUCTION 1 Paper presented , 1999 .

[8]  Lourdes García-Rodríguez,et al.  Double cascade organic Rankine cycle for solar-driven reverse osmosis desalination , 2007 .

[9]  Philip C. Eames,et al.  The state of the art in modelling line-axis concentrating solar energy collectors , 1996 .

[10]  Frank P. Incropera,et al.  Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer , 1981 .

[11]  I. Sobey,et al.  Effect of boundary vorticity discretization on explicit stream‐function vorticity calculations , 2005 .

[12]  Jian‐Guo Liu,et al.  Vorticity Boundary Condition and Related Issues for Finite Difference Schemes , 1996 .

[13]  Pedro Horta,et al.  Long-term performance calculations based on steady-state efficiency test results: Analysis of optical effects affecting beam, diffuse and reflected radiation , 2008 .

[14]  V. K. Sharma,et al.  Efficiency test of solar collectors: uncertainty in the estimation of regression parameters and sensitivity analysis , 2002 .

[15]  G. D. Davis.  Natural convection of air in a square cavity: A bench mark numerical solution , 1983 .

[16]  W. Beckman,et al.  Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes , 1985 .

[17]  John W. Mitchell,et al.  Convective heat transfer in vee-trough linear concentrators , 1982 .

[18]  Natural Convection in a Square Cavity in the Presence of Heated Plate , 2007 .

[19]  Lourdes García-Rodríguez,et al.  Preliminary design of a solar thermal-powered seawater reverse osmosis system , 2007 .

[20]  Ari Rabl,et al.  Active solar collectors and their applications , 1985 .

[21]  J. Anderson,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics : the basics with applications , 1995 .

[22]  H. P. Garg,et al.  Minimizing convective heat losses in flat plate solar collectors , 1980 .

[23]  Jeffrey M. Gordon,et al.  Truncation of CPC solar collectors and its effect on energy collection , 1985 .

[24]  W. Spotz.  Accuracy and performance of numerical wall boundary conditions for steady, 2D, incompressible streamfunction vorticity , 1998 .

[25]  A. Rabl.  Optical and thermal properties of Compound Parabolic Concentrators , 1975 .

[26]  Philip C. Eames,et al.  Detailed parametric analyses of heat transfer in CPC solar energy collectors , 1993 .

[27]  Jan-Olof Dalenbäck.  ISES Solar World Congress 2003, Göteborg, Sweden , 2005 .

[28]  L. Quartapelle,et al.  A review of vorticity conditions in the numerical solution of the ζ–ψ equations , 1999 .

[29]  Philip C. Eames,et al.  Thermal and optical consequences of the introduction of baffles into compound parabolic concentrating solar energy collector cavities , 1995 .

[30]  S. Saravanan,et al.  Effect of baffle–cavity ratios on buoyancy convection in a cavity with mutually orthogonal heated baffles , 2008 .

[31]  S. Saravanan,et al.  Buoyancy convection in a square cavity with mutually orthogonal heat generating baffles , 2008 .

[32]  Nicholas P. Lavery,et al.  View factor calculation using the Monte Carlo method and numerical sensitivity , 2005 .

[33]  N. E. Wijeysundera,et al.  A numerical study of the natural convection in CPC solar collector cavities with tubular absorbers , 1989 .

[34]  Maria João Carvalho,et al.  NEW LOW CONCENTRATION CPC TYPE COLLECTOR WITH CONVECTION CONTROLED BY A HONEYCOMB TIM MATERIAL: A COMPROMISE WITH STAGNATION TEMPERATURE CONTROL AND SURVIVAL OF CHEAP FABRICATION MATERIALS , 2003 .