Attitudinal and Intentional Acceptance of Domestic Robots by Younger and Older Adults

A study was conducted to examine the expectations that younger and older individuals have about domestic robots and how these expectations relate to robot acceptance. In a questionnaire participants were asked to imagine a robot in their home and to indicate how much items representing technology, social partner, and teammate acceptance matched their robot. There were additional questions about how useful and easy to use they thought their robot would be. The dependent variables were attitudinal and intentional acceptance. The analysis of the responses of 117 older adults (aged 65-86) and 60 younger adults (aged 18-25) indicated that individuals thought of robots foremost as performance-directed machines, less so as social devices, and least as unproductive entities. The robustness of the Technology Acceptance Model to robot acceptance was supported. Technology experience accounted for the variance in robot acceptance due to age.

[1]  Joelle Pineau,et al.  Experiences with a mobile robotic guide for the elderly , 2002, AAAI/IAAI.

[2]  Timothy W. Bickmore,et al.  'It's just like you talk to a friend' relational agents for older adults , 2005, Interact. Comput..

[3]  Paolo Dario,et al.  MOVAID: a personal robot in everyday life of disabled and elderly people , 1999 .

[4]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  What is a robot companion - friend, assistant or butler? , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[5]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[6]  Joseph Sharit,et al.  A cost-benefit analysis methodology for assessing product adoption by older user populations. , 2004, Applied ergonomics.

[7]  M. Skubic,et al.  A technology and nursing collaboration to help older adults age in place. , 2005, Nursing outlook.

[8]  Masatsugu Kidode,et al.  Human-Robot Interaction in the Home Ubiquitous Network Environment , 2007, HCI.

[9]  Lynda Aiman-Smith,et al.  Assessing a multidimensional measure of radical technological innovation , 1995 .

[10]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[11]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[12]  Fred D. Davis.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[13]  A. Tokosumi,et al.  An Intelligent Artifact as a Cohabitant: An Analysis of a Home Robot_s Conversation Log , 2007, Second International Conference on Innovative Computing, Informatio and Control (ICICIC 2007).

[14]  Julie A. Jacko.  Interaction platforms and techniques , 2007 .

[15]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[16]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Toward sociable robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[17]  M. Skubic,et al.  Older adults' attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: a pilot study , 2004, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.