The dimensions and directionality of trust and their roles in the development of shared business-IS understanding

Prior work suggests that mutual trust is an important antecedent to knowledge transfer and shared understanding between the IS and business units; however, the findings have been based on a conceptualization of trust as a one-dimensional construct. Using a richer dyadic conceptualization and operationalization of trust, we empirically investigated the degree to which the importance of trust varies across two members of a dyadic relationship as well as the different role of distinct facets of trust. Analysis of data collected from two informants (the IS manager and a business-unit counterpart) in a sample of manufacturing firms showed that perceived business-unit trustworthiness was significantly more important in fostering shared business-IS understanding than perceived IS-unit trustworthiness. We attributed this to the inherent power asymmetry that characterizes the relationship between IS and business units. We further hypothesized and found that the importance of the three key dimensions of trust (benevolence, integrity, and competence) depended on the relationship age and organizational position of the IS unit. Our findings show how to manage this critical dyadic relationships more effectively and also where to focus trust-building practices in order to ensure success.

[1]  M NelsonKay,et al.  The contribution of shared knowledge to IS group performance , 1996 .

[2]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[3]  Yolande E. Chan,et al.  Business Strategic Orientation, Information Systems Strategic Orientation, and Strategic Alignment , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Develop Long-Term Competitiveness through IT Assets , 1996 .

[5]  Norman L. Chervany,et al.  What Trust Means in E-Commerce Customer Relationships: An Interdisciplinary Conceptual Typology , 2001, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[6]  W. S. Chow,et al.  Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[7]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Power and Information Technology Research: A Metatriangulation Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[8]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  Trustworthiness in B2C e-commerce: an examination of alternative models , 2005, DATB.

[9]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Muzafer Sherif,et al.  In common predicament : social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation , 1967 .

[11]  Charles J. Kacmar,et al.  Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  F. Davis,et al.  Intergroup Relations and Leadership , 1964 .

[13]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  A Practical Guide To Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial And Annotated Example , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Gyoo Gun Lim,et al.  The impact of partnership attributes on EDI implementation success , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[15]  Jae-Nam Lee,et al.  Vendors' perspectives on trust and control in offshore information systems outsourcing , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[16]  Vijay Sethi,et al.  Rationality in Strategic Information Technology Decisions: The Impact of Shared Domain Knowledge and IT Unit Structure , 2002, Decis. Sci..

[17]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[18]  J. C. Henderson.  PLUGGING INTO STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS: THE CRITICAL IS CONNECTION , 1990 .

[19]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[20]  Gautam Ray,et al.  Information Technology and the Performance of the Customer Service Process: A Resource-Based Analysis , 2005, MIS Q..

[21]  William L. Fuerst,et al.  Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis , 1995 .

[22]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Psychological Contract Violation in Online Marketplaces: Antecedents, Consequences, and Moderating Role , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  Russell L. Purvis,et al.  Trust-building mechanisms utilized in outsourced IS development projects: a case study , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[24]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[25]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[26]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[27]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Factors That Influence the Social Dimension of Alignment Between Business and Information Technology Objectives , 2000, MIS Q..

[28]  J. Rockart.  The line takes the leadership: IS management in a wired society , 1990 .

[29]  Hans Rämö,et al.  Moments of trust: temporal and spatial factors of trust in organizations , 2004 .

[30]  V. Sambamurthy,et al.  Information Technology Assimilation in Firms: The Influence of Senior Leadership and IT Infrastructures , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .