MANAGEMENT OF VEGETATION TO REDUCE WILDLIFE HAZARDS AT AIRPORTS

and owls), and blackbirds (Ictennae)/starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) are the species presently of most concern at airports (Dolbeer et al. [3], Cleary et al. [I]). Sound management techniques that reduce bird numbers in and around airports are therefore critical for safe airport operations. Large-scale lethal control efforts to solve wildlife-aviation conflicts are often undesirable or impractical (Dolbeer [4], Dolbeer [5]). Nonlethal frightening techniques to keep birds and other hazardous wildlife away from airports (e.g., pyrotechnics, propane cannon exploders, acoustical devices) are available (Marsh et al. [6], Cleary [7]), but may be untested, only temporarily effective, or cost-prohibitive (Dolbeer et al. [8]). Modifying and managing habitats within airport environments is the most important long-term component of an integrated wildlife damage management approach to reduce the use of airfields by birds and mammals that pose hazards to aviation. Traditional grassland habitat management practices, such as disking, prescribed burning, and planting food plots, are conducted to benefit wildlife by providing food, cover, water, loafing areas, or other necessities (Bolen and Robinson [9]). In contrast, the focus of habitat management efforts on airfields should be to develop and maintain habitats that are unattractive to wildlife species hazardous to aviation.

[1]  T. Messmer,et al.  Feeding preferences and changes in mass of Canada Geese grazing endophyte-infected tall fescue , 1996 .

[2]  C. Hoveland,et al.  The tall-fescue endophyte. , 1993 .

[3]  H. Mead,et al.  THE MANAGEMENT OF LONG GRASS AS A BIRD REPELLENT ON AIRFIELDS , 1973 .

[4]  Richard A. Dolbeer,et al.  Wildlife Strikes to Civil Aircraft in the United States 1990-2007 , 2008 .

[5]  Guiming Wang,et al.  Response of American kestrels and gray-tailed voles to vegetation height and supplemental perches , 2001 .

[6]  B. Washburn,et al.  Improving northern bobwhite habitat by converting tall fescue fields to native warm-season grasses. , 2000 .

[7]  T. Osborn,et al.  Effects of endophyte-infected tall fescue on animal performance , 1993 .

[8]  T. Barnes,et al.  An assessment of habitat quality for northern bobwhite in tall fescue-dominated fields. , 1995 .

[9]  H. G. Cumming,et al.  Wildlife Ecology and Management , 1985 .

[10]  H. Blokpoel,et al.  Bird Hazards to Aircraft , 1978 .

[11]  C. J. Bridgman,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF LONG GRASS AS A BIRD DETERRENT ON BRITISH AIRFIELDS , 1980 .

[12]  K. Clay,et al.  Avian seed preference and weight loss experiments: the effect of fungal endophyte-infected tall fescue seeds , 1991, Oecologia.

[13]  Wei Wu,et al.  [Effects of straw mulching and irrigation on solar energy utilization efficiency of winter wheat farmland]. , 1980, Ying yong sheng tai xue bao = The journal of applied ecology.

[14]  J. Alcock Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach , 1975 .

[15]  Richard A. Dolbeer,et al.  DOES TALL GRASS REDUCE BIRD NUMBERS ON AIRPORTS?: RESULTS OF PEN TEST WITH CANADA GEESE AND FIELD TRIALS AT TWO AIRPORTS, 1998 , 1999 .

[16]  H. A. Fribourg,et al.  Effects of Tall Fescue Endophyte Infestation on Relative Abundance of Small Mammals , 1995 .

[17]  R. Dolbeer POPULATION DYNAMICS: THE FOUNDATION OF WILDLIFE DAMAGE MANAGEMENT FOR THE 21st CENTURY , 1998 .

[18]  P. Buckley,et al.  Insects, Vegetation, and the Control of Laughing Gulls (Larus atricilla) at Kennedy International Airport, New York City , 1994 .

[19]  N. Hill,et al.  Neotyphodium/Grass Interactions , 1997, Springer US.