For Better or for Worse? School Finance Reform in California.

[1]  J. Betts.  IS THERE A LINK BETWEEN SCHOOL INPUTS AND EARNINGS? FRESH SCRUTINY OF AN OLD LITERATURE , 1996 .

[2]  W. Oates.  The Effects of Property Taxes and Local Public Spending on Property Values: An Empirical Study of Tax Capitalization and the Tiebout Hypothesis , 1969, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  Reform and Retrenchment: The Politics of California School Finance Reform. A Rand Note. , 1981 .

[4]  S. Rosen.  Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  Jay R. Campbell,et al.  The NAEP 1998 Reading Report Card for the Nation. , 1999 .

[6]  G. D. Jud,et al.  Schools and Housing Values , 1981 .

[7]  P. Gleason,et al.  Using scholastic aptitude test scores as indicators of state educational performance , 1993 .

[8]  P. Kurland.  Foreword: 'Equal in Origin and Equal in Title to the Legislative and Executive Branches of the Government' , 1964 .

[9]  Ronald L. Oaxaca,et al.  On discrimination and the decomposition of wage differentials , 1994 .

[10]  A. Alexander,et al.  Schools, taxes, and voter behavior : an analysis of school district property tax elections : prepared under a grant from the Ford Foundation , 1974 .

[11]  D. Rubinfeld,et al.  Micro-Based Estimates of Demand Functions for Local School Expenditures , 1982 .

[12]  Thomas B. Timar.  Politics, Policy, and Categorical Aid: New Inequities in California School Finance , 1994 .

[13]  R Sikorski,et al.  Worlds Collide , 1997, Science.

[14]  David N. Figlio,et al.  School Finance Reforms, Tax Limits, and Student Performance: Do Reforms Level-Up or Dumb Down? , 1998 .

[15]  Sheila E. Murray,et al.  Education-Finance Reform and the Distribution of Education Resources , 1998 .

[16]  Mary M. Sprague,et al.  Has Proposition 13 Delivered? The Changing Tax Burden in California , 1998 .

[17]  Terri A. Sexton,et al.  Property Taxes and Tax Revolts: The Legacy of Proposition 13 , 1995 .

[18]  Jon Sonstelie.  PUBLIC SCHOOL QUALITY AND PRIVATE SCHOOL ENROLLMENTS , 1979, National Tax Journal.

[19]  Eric A. Hanushek,et al.  The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools , 1986 .

[20]  J. Roback.  Wages, Rents, and the Quality of Life , 1982, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  R. Manwaring,et al.  Litigation, School Finance Reform, and Aggregate Educational Spending , 1997 .

[22]  Michael A. Shires.  Patterns in California Government Revenues Since Proposition 13 , 1999 .

[23]  John E. Coons,et al.  Private Wealth and Public Education. , 1972 .

[24]  T. Crone,et al.  House prices and the quality of public schools: what are we buying? , 1998 .

[25]  Sheila E. Murray,et al.  Schoolhouses, courthouses, and statehouses after Serrano , 1997 .

[26]  G. Blomquist,et al.  New Estimates of Quality of Life in Urban Areas , 1988 .

[27]  Kern Alexander,et al.  Public School Finance , 1995 .

[28]  A. Wise.  Rich Schools, Poor Schools: The Promise of Equal Educational Opportunity , 1968 .

[29]  Thomas A. Downes.  EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF SCHOOL FINANCE REFORM ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC EDUCATION: THE CALIFORNIA CASE , 1992, National Tax Journal.

[30]  R. Deacon,et al.  The Demand for the Services of Non-Federal Governments , 1972 .

[31]  Eric A. Hanushek,et al.  The Impact of Differential Expenditures on School Performance , 1989 .

[32]  Robert J. Mislevy,et al.  Randomization-based inference about latent variables from complex samples , 1991 .

[33]  Michael L. Walden,et al.  Interstate variation in teacher salaries , 1995 .

[34]  W. E. Nelson,et al.  The Fourteenth Amendment: From Political Principle to Judicial Doctrine , 1989 .

[35]  David N. Figlio.  Did the “tax revolt” reduce school performance? , 1997 .

[36]  Charles M. Tiebout.  A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures , 1956, Journal of Political Economy.

[37]  Jon Sonstelie,et al.  DID SERRANO CAUSE A DECLINE IN SCHOOL SPENDING? , 1995, National Tax Journal.

[38]  Sandra E. Black.  Do better schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary education , 1999 .

[39]  Helen F. Ladd,et al.  School Finance Litigation in the Name of Educational Equity: Its Evolution, Impact and Future , 1999 .

[40]  Robert D. Johnston,et al.  Paradise Lost: California's Experience, America's Future Peter Schrag , 1999 .

[41]  P. Enrich,et al.  Leaving equality behind: new directions in school finance reform , 1995 .

[42]  F. Nelson.  An Interstate Cost-of-Living Index , 1991 .

[43]  M. Klarman.  An Interpretive History of Modern Equal Protection , 1991 .

[44]  R. Halvorsen,et al.  Choice of functional form for hedonic price equations , 1981 .

[45]  Estimating Property Tax Capitalization: A Further Comment , 1981, Journal of Political Economy.

[46]  Julie Slayton,et al.  Beyond the Rhetoric of Charter School Reform: A Study of Ten California School Districts , 1998 .

[47]  Helen F. Ladd,et al.  State responses to the TRA86 revenue windfalls: A new test of the flypaper effect , 1993 .

[48]  J. Betts,et al.  Equal Resources, Equal Outcomes? The Distribution of School Resources and Student Achievement in California , 2000 .

[49]  M. Kirst.  Coalition Building For School Finance Reform: The Case of California , 1978 .

[50]  Donald R. Haurin,et al.  School Quality and Real House Prices: Inter- and Intrametropolitan Effects , 1996 .

[51]  Thomas A. Husted,et al.  Understanding state variations in SAT scores , 1993 .

[52]  S. Carroll,et al.  The search for equity in school finance , 1979 .

[53]  Jon Sonstelie.  The Welfare Cost of Free Public Schools , 1982, Journal of Political Economy.

[54]  Mingche M. Li,et al.  Micro-Neighborhood Externalities and Hedonic Housing Prices , 1980 .

[55]  R. Mendelsohn,et al.  The choice of functional forms for hedonic price equations: Comment , 1985 .

[56]  Clyde M. Reese.  NAEP 1996 Mathematics Report Card for the Nation and the States. Findings from the National Assessment of Educational Progress. , 1997 .

[57]  Brian A. Cromwell,et al.  HOW MUCH MORE IS A GOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT WORTH? , 1997, National Tax Journal.

[58]  G. Turnbull.  The Overspending and Flypaper Effects of Fiscal Illusion: Theory and Empirical Evidence , 1998 .

[59]  Thomas A. Downes,et al.  School Finance Reform and Private School Enrollment: Evidence from California* , 1998 .

[60]  Thomas A. Husted,et al.  Evidence on the Impact of State Government on Primary and Secondary Education and the Equity‐Efficiency Trade‐Off* , 2000, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[61]  Jay R. Campbell,et al.  NAEP 1998 Writing Report Card for the Nation and the States. , 1999 .

[62]  Deborah Reed,et al.  The distribution of income in California , 1996 .

[63]  Reform and Retrenchment: The Politics of California School Finance Reform. By Elmore Richard F. and McLaughlin Milbrey Wallin. (Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Publishing, 1982. Pp. xii + 260. $26.00.) , 1983 .

[64]  D. W. Rasmussen,et al.  Salaries in Public Education: the Impact of Geographic Cost-of-Living Differentials , 1986 .

[65]  Roger A. Sugden,et al.  Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys , 1988 .

[66]  T. McGuire,et al.  Do Limits Matter? Evidence on the Effects of Tax Limitations on Student Performance , 1998 .

[67]  L. Picus.  Incentive Funding Programs and School District Response: California and Senate Bill 813 , 1991 .