Sparse time artifact removal

Abstract Background Muscle artifacts and electrode noise are an obstacle to interpretation of EEG and other electrophysiological signals. They are often channel-specific and do not fully benefit from component analysis techniques such as ICA, and their presence reduces the dimensionality needed by those techniques. Their high-frequency content may mask or masquerade as gamma band cortical activity. New method The sparse time artifact removal (STAR) algorithm removes artifacts that are sparse in space and time. The time axis is partitioned into an artifact-free and an artifact-contaminated part, and the correlation structure of the data is estimated from the covariance matrix of the artifact-free part. Artifacts are then corrected by projection of each channel onto the subspace spanned by the other channels. Results The method is evaluated with both simulated and real data, and found to be highly effective in removing or attenuating typical channel-specific artifacts. Comparison with existing methods In contrast to the widespread practice of trial removal or channel removal or interpolation, very few data are lost. In contrast to ICA or other linear techniques, processing is local in time and affects only the artifact part, so most of the data are identical to the unprocessed data and the full dimensionality of the data is preserved. Conclusions STAR complements other linear component analysis techniques, and can enhance their ability to discover weak sources of interest by increasing the number of effective noise-free channels.

[1]  Kenneth J. Pope,et al.  Thinking activates EMG in scalp electrical recordings , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  Junshui Ma,et al.  Muscle artifacts in multichannel EEG: Characteristics and reduction , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  Alain de Cheveigné Quadratic component analysis , 2012, NeuroImage.

[4]  Laurent Peyrodie,et al.  Improvements of Adaptive Filtering by Optimal Projection to filter different artifact types on long duration EEG recordings , 2012, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[5]  Jonathan Z. Simon,et al.  Denoising based on spatial filtering , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  Jonathan Z. Simon,et al.  Abstract Journal of Neuroscience Methods 165 (2007) 297–305 Denoising based on time-shift PCA , 2007 .

[7]  Dennis J. McFarland,et al.  Brain-computer interface (BCI) operation: signal and noise during early training sessions , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  I. Nelken,et al.  Transient Induced Gamma-Band Response in EEG as a Manifestation of Miniature Saccades , 2008, Neuron.

[9]  Preben Kidmose,et al.  Auditory evoked responses from Ear-EEG recordings , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  E. Whitham,et al.  Scalp electrical recording during paralysis: Quantitative evidence that EEG frequencies above 20Hz are contaminated by EMG , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  Richard J. Davidson,et al.  Electromyogenic artifacts and electroencephalographic inferences revisited , 2011, NeuroImage.

[12]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[13]  S. Muthukumaraswamy High-frequency brain activity and muscle artifacts in MEG/EEG: a review and recommendations , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[14]  Fernando Lopes da Silva,et al.  Comprar Niedermeyer's Electroencephalography, 6/e (Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields ) | Fernando Lopes Da Silva | 9780781789424 | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins , 2010 .

[15]  Richard J. Davidson,et al.  Validation of ICA-based myogenic artifact correction for scalp and source-localized EEG , 2010, NeuroImage.

[16]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  EMG contamination of EEG: spectral and topographical characteristics , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis , 2007, NeuroImage.

[18]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[19]  R. B. Reilly,et al.  FASTER: Fully Automated Statistical Thresholding for EEG artifact Rejection , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  R. Ward,et al.  EMG and EOG artifacts in brain computer interface systems: A survey , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[21]  F. Perrin,et al.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  Michael S. Lazar,et al.  Spatial patterns underlying population differences in the background EEG , 2005, Brain Topography.

[23]  B S Kopell,et al.  Prevalence and methods of control of the cephalic skin potential EEG artifact. , 1974, Psychophysiology.

[24]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Joint decorrelation, a versatile tool for multichannel data analysis , 2014, NeuroImage.

[25]  Ernst Fernando Lopes Da Silva Niedermeyer,et al.  Electroencephalography, basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields , 1982 .

[26]  Kemal S. Türker,et al.  Interference of tonic muscle activity on the EEG: a single motor unit study , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[27]  Alain de Cheveigné,et al.  Sensor noise suppression , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[28]  Alain de Cheveigné,et al.  Time-shift denoising source separation , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[29]  Vinzenz von Tscharner,et al.  Methodological aspects of EEG and body dynamics measurements during motion , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[30]  Mercedes Atienza,et al.  Muscle Artifact Removal from Human Sleep EEG by Using Independent Component Analysis , 2008, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  Alain de Cheveigné,et al.  Denoising based on time-shift PCA , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[32]  Richard J. Davidson,et al.  Electromyogenic Artifacts and Electroencephalographic Inferences , 2009, Brain Topography.

[33]  Lotfi Senhadji,et al.  Removal of muscle artifact from EEG data: comparison between stochastic (ICA and CCA) and deterministic (EMD and wavelet-based) approaches , 2012, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[34]  Moritz Grosse-Wentrup,et al.  Beamforming in Noninvasive Brain–Computer Interfaces , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.