The Internal State Scale: replication of its discriminating abilities in a multisite, public sector sample.

OBJECTIVE The Internal State Scale (ISS) is a self-report instrument that has been validated for discriminating mood states in patients with bipolar disorder. This study a) extends investigation to a multisite public sector sample and b) tests a revised scoring algorithm that formally identifies patients in mixed states. METHODS Eighty-six patients with bipolar disorder from four Veterans Affairs medical centers were assessed in a cross-sectional design. Physician-conducted semi-structured interviews used DSM-IV criteria to identify subjects as meeting criteria for euthymia, mania or hypomania, depression, or mixed state (mania or hypomania plus depression). A revised ISS scoring algorithm independently assigned mood state. Mean subscale scores were analyzed across groups. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to determine optimal algorithm structure. RESULTS Analysis of mean scores for the ISS subscales replicated original results for Activation, Well-Being, and Perceived Conflict, but indicated differences from the original results for the Depression Index. The ROC curve analysis identified optimal cut-off scores for the revised algorithm. The overall kappa score indicated moderate agreement between ISS and physician ratings of mood state, including mixed states. LIMITATIONS The study used a sample consisting primarily of male veterans. Mood state was assigned by experts using expert clinician diagnosis, not structured interviews. CONCLUSION The performance of the ISS in this multisite, public sector sample was similar to the performance in the initial research clinic sample. This finding confirms the validity of the ISS as a discriminator of mood states in bipolar disorder. The development of a revised scoring algorithm makes feasible formal identification of mixed episodes with the ISS.

[1]  A. Swann,et al.  Phenomenology of mania: evidence for distinct depressed, dysphoric, and euphoric presentations. , 1999, The American journal of psychiatry.

[2]  P. Keck,et al.  Clinical and research implications of the diagnosis of dysphoric or mixed mania or hypomania. , 1992, The American journal of psychiatry.

[3]  B. Kinosian,et al.  Principles of effectiveness trials and their implementation in VA Cooperative Study #430: 'Reducing the efficacy-effectiveness gap in bipolar disorder'. , 2001, Journal of affective disorders.

[4]  P. Whybrow,et al.  Independent assessment of manic and depressive symptoms by self-rating. Scale characteristics and implications for the study of mania. , 1991, Archives of general psychiatry.

[5]  M Davies,et al.  The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). II. Multisite test-retest reliability. , 1992 .

[6]  A. Swann Mixed or dysphoric manic states: psychopathology and treatment. , 1995, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[7]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[8]  S. Koslow,et al.  Specificity of mixed affective states: clinical comparison of dysphoric mania and agitated depression. , 1993, Journal of affective disorders.

[9]  R. Cooke,et al.  Comparative evaluation of two self-report mania rating scales , 1996, Biological Psychiatry.

[10]  R. Fieve,et al.  Emotion profiles associated with mania and depression. , 1969, Archives of general psychiatry.

[11]  P. Whybrow,et al.  Testing definitions of dysphoric mania and hypomania: prevalence, clinical characteristics and inter-episode stability. , 1994, Journal of affective disorders.

[12]  M. Bauer,et al.  Impact of an easy-access VA clinic-based program for patients with bipolar disorder. , 1997, Psychiatric services.