Budget impact analysis of bevacizumab biosimilars for cancer treatment in adult patients in Spain

Objective To assess the economic impact of introducing biosimilars of bevacizumab for the management of cancer patients receiving systemic bevacizumab in the National Health System (SNHS) of Spain. Methods A 3-year budget impact analysis model was adapted to estimate the cost of introducing biosimilars of bevacizumab in the SNHS for the adult population who were candidates to receive treatment with bevacizumab. Values for the estimation of the population were obtained from the literature and were validated by an expert panel. In this analysis only pharmaceutical costs (€, year 2021) obtained from official databases were considered. A sensitivity analysis was performed to examine the robustness of the model. Results The introduction of bevacizumab biosimilars would generate an annual cost saving of €11 558 268 (−5.1%) for the first year with a penetration share of biosimilars from 30.0%, €29 126 373 (−8.5%) for the second year with a share of 50.0% and €52 361 778 (−13.6%) for the third year with a share of 80.0%. The total pharmaceutical costs of the scenario without biosimilars are €227 033 352 for the first year, €342 663 209 for the second year and €385 013 076 for the third year. In contrast, the pharmaceutical costs of the scenario with bevacizumab biosimilars are €215 475 084, €313 536 836 and €332 651 297 for years 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Conclusions The introduction of biosimilars in the Spanish Health System would generate saving costs in the pharmacological budget to boost biological drugs from the first year.

[1]  J. Simos,et al.  The Early Stage of COVID-19 Outbreak in Greece: A Review of the National Response and the Socioeconomic Impact , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[2]  Laura Corregidor-Luna,et al.  Pharmaceutical management of the COVID-19 pandemic in a mid-size hospital. , 2020, Farmacia hospitalaria : organo oficial de expresion cientifica de la Sociedad Espanola de Farmacia Hospitalaria.

[3]  Josep Maria Guiu Segura,et al.  Medicamentos biosimilares: medidas para fomentar su uso , 2020 .

[4]  I. Chirivella,et al.  SEOM clinical guideline for treatment of kidney cancer (2019) , 2020, Clinical and Translational Oncology.

[5]  A. Carrato,et al.  Treatment patterns for metastatic colorectal cancer in Spain , 2020, Clinical and Translational Oncology.

[6]  J. Bosch-Barrera,et al.  Lung cancer in Spain: information from the Thoracic Tumors Registry (TTR study). , 2019, Translational lung cancer research.

[7]  N. Reguart,et al.  SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (2018) , 2018, Clinical and Translational Oncology.

[8]  A. Tinker,et al.  Bevacizumab in Metastatic, Recurrent, or Persistent Cervical Cancer: The BC Cancer Experience , 2018, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[9]  E. Gallardo,et al.  SEOM clinical guideline for treatment of kidney cancer (2017) , 2017, Clinical and Translational Oncology.

[10]  S. Mocellin,et al.  Second-line systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[11]  S. Sullivan,et al.  Budget impact analysis-principles of good practice: report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force. , 2014, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[12]  M. de Boer,et al.  Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer subtypes: the hormone receptor/HER2-positive subtype is associated with the most favorable outcome , 2013, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[13]  D. Mutch,et al.  Multicenter phase II trial of topotecan, cisplatin and bevacizumab for recurrent or persistent cervical cancer. , 2010, Gynecologic oncology.

[14]  C. Sessa,et al.  Newly diagnosed and relapsed epithelial ovarian carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[15]  E. Small,et al.  Phase III trial of bevacizumab plus interferon alfa versus interferon alfa monotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: final results of CALGB 90206. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  R. Campelo,et al.  SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of small-cell lung cancer , 2010 .

[17]  R. Gray,et al.  Outcomes for elderly, advanced-stage non small-cell lung cancer patients treated with bevacizumab in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel: analysis of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial 4599. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.