Evaluation method for a controller of active mass damper using central pattern generator

This paper proposes an evaluation method for a CPG controller designed for active mass dampers. Neural oscillators composing the CPG have nonlinear and entrainment properties. Therefore, the proposed controller has possibility to have flexibility, when the structural parameters, i.e. stiffness or damping, are changed by the effect of earthquakes and the like. However, there has been no study to evaluate the controller’s above-mentioned properties. For tuning into practical application, the reliability and flexibility along with the controller’s performance must be analyzed. In our previous study, the phase reduction theory was tried to appraise the synchronization between a structure and a single neural oscillator and the synchronization region of the neural oscillator was obtained as basic research. However, the information from the synchronization region was insufficient to evaluate the system, because the neural oscillator has a phase difference called a phase locking point between the structure and the neural oscillator during the synchronization. Then, in this paper, the phase locking point within the synchronization region between a structure and a single neural oscillator is focused on, and the phase locking point and the vibration mitigation effect are considered with the simple object model.

[1]  Kiyotoshi Matsuoka,et al.  Sustained oscillations generated by mutually inhibiting neurons with adaptation , 1985, Biological Cybernetics.

[2]  Hiroshi Kimura,et al.  Biologically inspired adaptive walking of a quadruped robot , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[3]  Daisuke Iba,et al.  Structural vibration control by tuned mass damper using central pattern generator , 2011, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[4]  Daisuke Iba,et al.  Mutual synchronization between structure and central pattern generator , 2012, Smart Structures.

[5]  Yasuomi D. Sato,et al.  Tuning Time Scale Parameter of Piecewise Linear Oscillators for Phase Resetting Control , 2011 .

[6]  S. Grillner Control of Locomotion in Bipeds, Tetrapods, and Fish , 1981 .

[7]  Eric Shea-Brown,et al.  On the Phase Reduction and Response Dynamics of Neural Oscillator Populations , 2004, Neural Computation.

[8]  Kiyotoshi Matsuoka,et al.  Mechanisms of frequency and pattern control in the neural rhythm generators , 1987, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  Yasuhiro Fukuoka,et al.  Adaptive Dynamic Walking of a Quadruped Robot on Irregular Terrain Based on Biological Concepts , 2003, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[10]  A. Winfree The geometry of biological time , 1991 .

[11]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[12]  Gentaro Taga,et al.  A model of the neuro-musculo-skeletal system for human locomotion , 1995, Biological Cybernetics.

[13]  Kazunori Hase,et al.  Computational evolution of human bipedal walking by a neuro-musculo-skeletal model , 1999, Artificial Life and Robotics.

[14]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization - A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences , 2001, Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series.