Performance of turbo high-pitch dual-source CT for coronary CT angiography: first ex vivo and patient experience

ObjectivesTo evaluate image quality, maximal heart rate allowing for diagnostic imaging, and radiation dose of turbo high-pitch dual-source coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA).MethodsFirst, a cardiac motion phantom simulating heart rates (HRs) from 60-90 bpm in 5-bpm steps was examined on a third-generation dual-source 192-slice CT (prospective ECG-triggering, pitch 3.2; rotation time, 250 ms). Subjective image quality regarding the presence of motion artefacts was interpreted by two readers on a four-point scale (1, excellent; 4, non-diagnostic). Objective image quality was assessed by calculating distortion vectors. Thereafter, 20 consecutive patients (median, 50 years) undergoing clinically indicated CCTA were included.ResultsIn the phantom study, image quality was rated diagnostic up to the HR75 bpm, with object distortion being 1 mm or less. Distortion increased above 1 mm at HR of 80-90 bpm. Patients had a mean HR of 66 bpm (47-78 bpm). Coronary segments were of diagnostic image quality for all patients with HR up to 73 bpm. Average effective radiation dose in patients was 0.6 ± 0.3 mSv.ConclusionsOur combined phantom and patient study indicates that CCTA with turbo high-pitch third-generation dual-source 192-slice CT can be performed at HR up to 75 bpm while maintaining diagnostic image quality, being associated with an average radiation dose of 0.6 mSv.Key points• CCTA is feasible with the turbo high-pitch mode.• Turbo high-pitch CCTA provides diagnostic image quality up to 73 bpm.• The radiation dose of high-pitch CCTA is 0.6 mSv on average.

[1]  Dianna D Cody,et al.  Quality initiatives: CT radiation dose reduction: how to implement change without sacrificing diagnostic quality. , 2011, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[2]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Dual-source versus 64-section CT coronary angiography at lower heart rates: comparison of accuracy and radiation dose. , 2009, Radiology.

[3]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Dual-source CT coronary angiography: image quality, mean heart rate, and heart rate variability. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  High-pitch dual-source CT coronary angiography: systolic data acquisition at high heart rates , 2010, European Radiology.

[5]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Effect of high-pitch dual-source CT to compensate motion artifacts: a phantom study. , 2013, Academic radiology.

[6]  W. Kalender,et al.  Assessment of calcium scoring performance in cardiac computed tomography , 2003, European Radiology.

[7]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. , 2010, European heart journal.

[8]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Radiation dose of cardiac computed tomography – what has been achieved and what needs to be done , 2011, European Radiology.

[9]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Predictors of image quality in high-pitch coronary CT angiography. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  R. Frye,et al.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. , 1975, Circulation.

[11]  Peng Wang,et al.  Radiation and contrast agent doses reductions by using 80-kV tube voltage in coronary computed tomographic angiography: a comparative study. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[12]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Low-dose, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography: accuracy and radiation dose of the high-pitch and the step-and-shoot mode , 2010, Heart.

[13]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  High-pitch spiral acquisition: a new scan mode for coronary CT angiography. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[14]  Andrew E Arai,et al.  Radiation Dose from Single-Heartbeat Coronary CT Angiography Performed with a 320 – Detector Row Volume Scanner 1 , 2010 .

[15]  S. Abbara.  ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography , 2011 .

[16]  W. Kalender,et al.  Image quality of ultra-low radiation exposure coronary CT angiography with an effective dose <0.1 mSv using high-pitch spiral acquisition and raw data-based iterative reconstruction , 2013, European Radiology.

[17]  L. Xu,et al.  320-detector row CT coronary angiography: effects of heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality, diagnostic accuracy and radiation exposure. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.

[18]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography , 2008, European Radiology.

[19]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Effect of decrease in heart rate variability on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT coronary angiography. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  S. Wildermuth,et al.  Influence of cardiac hemodynamic parameters on coronary artery opacification with 64-slice computed tomography , 2006, European Radiology.

[21]  C. Fink,et al.  Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique—comparison with traditional filtered back projection , 2011, European Radiology.

[22]  W. Kalender,et al.  High-Pitch Electrocardiogram-Triggered Computed Tomography of the Chest: Initial Results , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[23]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Stenosis Quantification in Coronary CT Angiography: Impact of an Integrated Circuit Detector With Iterative Reconstruction , 2013, Investigative radiology.

[24]  J. Min,et al.  ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[25]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Automated attenuation-based selection of tube voltage and tube current for coronary CT angiography: reduction of radiation exposure versus a BMI-based strategy with an expert investigator. , 2013, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[26]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual-source CT for the assessment of coronary stenoses: first experience , 2009, European Radiology.