A Perturbed Hexagonal Lattice to Model Basestation Locations in Real-World Cellular Networks

For the emerging heterogeneous networks, the theoretical analysis has been largely limited to using a Poisson point process (PPP) model for the locations of base stations (BSs). This model has been shown to provide a lower bound on the coverage probability (CP) when compared with real-world deployments; as such, in this paper, we focus on a perturbed hexagonal lattice model. We show that, as compared to a PPP, this model better fits the locations of BSs in real-world cellular networks. We provide a tractable analysis for the signal-to-interference (SIR) CP at any point of an interference-limited reuse-1 network. Simulation results help illustrate the accuracy of the theory developed. The resulting average SIR CP (averaged over the network area) lies in between that of the PPP and the perfect hexagonal lattice models. The perturbation allows us to quantify the loss in the CP in moving from a perfect lattice model to a random BS deployment. Finally, we compare the perturbed lattice to real-world BS deployments using data from publicly available databases. Using the method of minimum contrast we show that the average SIR CP from the presented formulation accurately fits that of real-world cellular networks.

[1]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Modeling and Analysis of K-Tier Downlink Heterogeneous Cellular Networks , 2011, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[2]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  A Tractable Approach to Coverage and Rate in Cellular Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[3]  Martin Haenggi,et al.  Spatial Stochastic Models and Metrics for the Structure of Base Stations in Cellular Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[4]  Fortunato Santucci,et al.  Generalized Moment Matching for the Linear Combination of Lognormal RVs - Application to Outage Analysis in Wireless Systems , 2006, 2006 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[5]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Practical Maximum Pseudolikelihood for Spatial Point Patterns , 1998, Advances in Applied Probability.

[6]  Adrian Baddeley,et al.  Practical maximum pseudolikelihood for spatial point patterns , 1998, Advances in Applied Probability.

[7]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  An Analytical Framework for Multicell Cooperation via Stochastic Geometry and Large Deviations , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[8]  Salman Durrani,et al.  Distance Distributions in Regular Polygons , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[9]  Raviraj S. Adve,et al.  The penalty for random deployment in hexagonal lattice networks with perturbed interferers , 2014, 2014 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[10]  Abbas Jamalipour,et al.  Wireless communications , 2005, GLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005..

[11]  P. Diggle,et al.  Monte Carlo Methods of Inference for Implicit Statistical Models , 1984 .