Sequence Diversity, Reproductive Isolation and Species Concepts in Saccharomyces

Using the biological species definition, yeasts of the genus Saccharomyces sensu stricto comprise six species and one natural hybrid. Previous work has shown that reproductive isolation between the species is due primarily to sequence divergence acted upon by the mismatch repair system and not due to major gene differences or chromosomal rearrangements. Sequence divergence through mismatch repair has also been shown to cause partial reproductive isolation among populations within a species. We have surveyed sequence variation in populations of Saccharomyces sensu stricto yeasts and measured meiotic sterility in hybrids. This allows us to determine the divergence necessary to produce the reproductive isolation seen among species. Rather than a sharp transition from fertility to sterility, which may have been expected, we find a smooth monotonic relationship between diversity and reproductive isolation, even as far as the well-accepted designations of S. paradoxus and S. cerevisiae as distinct species. Furthermore, we show that one species of Saccharomyces—S. cariocanus—differs from a population of S. paradoxus by four translocations, but not by sequence. There is molecular evidence of recent introgression from S. cerevisiae into the European population of S. paradoxus, supporting the idea that in nature the boundary between these species is fuzzy.

[1]  Bernard Dujon,et al.  Hemiascomycetous yeasts at the forefront of comparative genomics. , 2005, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[2]  M. Radman,et al.  The barrier to recombination between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch-repair mutants , 1989, Nature.

[3]  E. Louis,et al.  A new genetically isolated population of theSaccharomyces sensu stricto complex from Brazil , 2004, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[4]  E. Louis,et al.  Nonrecombinant meiosis I nondisjunction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae induced by tRNA ochre suppressors. , 1989, Genetics.

[5]  J. Townsend,et al.  Population structure and gene evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2006, FEMS yeast research.

[6]  Loren H. Rieseberg,et al.  Hybrid Origins of Plant Species , 1997 .

[7]  T. Graves,et al.  Surveying Saccharomyces genomes to identify functional elements by comparative DNA sequence analysis. , 2001, Genome research.

[8]  E. Louis,et al.  NEJ1 prevents NHEJ-dependent telomere fusions in yeast without telomerase. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[9]  D. Hibbett,et al.  Phylogenetic species recognition and species concepts in fungi. , 2000, Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B.

[10]  Julio Rozas,et al.  DnaSP version 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis , 1999, Bioinform..

[11]  Justin C. Fay,et al.  Evidence for Domesticated and Wild Populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2005, PLoS genetics.

[12]  M. Chovanec,et al.  Non-homologous end-joining factors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2004, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[13]  S. Holmberg,et al.  Transfer of chromosome III duringkar mediated cytoduction in yeast , 1980 .

[14]  M. Basrai,et al.  Functional roles for evolutionarily conserved Spt4p at centromeres and heterochromatin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[15]  G. Naumov,et al.  [Taxonomic identification of Saccharomyces from yeast genetic stock centers of the University of California]. , 1994, Genetika.

[16]  A. Smogorzewska,et al.  Regulation of telomerase by telomeric proteins. , 2004, Annual review of biochemistry.

[17]  A. Martini,et al.  Saccharomyces paradoxus comb. nov., a Newly Separated Species of the Saccharomyces sensu stricto Complex Based upon nDNA/nDNA Homologies , 1989 .

[18]  Gianni Liti,et al.  Yeast evolution and comparative genomics. , 2005, Annual review of microbiology.

[19]  R H Borts,et al.  A role for the mismatch repair system during incipient speciation in Saccharomyces , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[20]  E. Louis,et al.  Three new species in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex: Saccharomyces cariocanus, Saccharomyces kudriavzevii and Saccharomyces mikatae. , 2000, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[21]  R. Borts,et al.  The mismatch repair system contributes to meiotic sterility in an interspecific yeast hybrid. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[22]  G. Liti,et al.  Inferences of evolutionary relationships from a population survey of LTR‐retrotransposons and telomeric‐associated sequences in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex , 2005, Yeast.

[23]  J. Townsend,et al.  Horizontal gene transfer, genome innovation and evolution , 2005, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[24]  R. Hudson,et al.  MATHEMATICAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE GENEALOGICAL SPECIES CONCEPT , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  E. Louis 2 Whole Chromosome Analysis , 1998 .

[26]  Kevin P. Byrne,et al.  Multiple rounds of speciation associated with reciprocal gene loss in polyploid yeasts , 2006, Nature.

[27]  A. Martini,et al.  Three newly delimited species of Saccharomyces sensu stricto , 2004, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[28]  H. A. Orr,et al.  Speciation genes. , 2004, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[29]  E. Parry,et al.  The tolerance of aneuploidy in yeast. , 1970, Genetical research.

[30]  E. Louis,et al.  Genetic homology between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its sibling species S. paradoxus and S. bayanus: Electrophoretic karyotypes , 1992, Yeast.

[31]  B. Birren,et al.  Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements , 2003, Nature.

[32]  M. Roberts,et al.  The effect of DNA sequence divergence on sexual isolation in Bacillus. , 1993, Genetics.

[33]  James Mallet,et al.  Taxonomic inflation: its influence on macroecology and conservation. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[34]  E. Louis,et al.  A complete set of marked telomeres in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for physical mapping and cloning. , 1995, Genetics.

[35]  S. Oliver,et al.  Engineering evolution to study speciation in yeasts , 2003, Nature.

[36]  S. Carroll,et al.  Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies , 2003, Nature.

[37]  P. Sniegowski,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus coexist in a natural woodland site in North America and display different levels of reproductive isolation from European conspecifics. , 2002, FEMS yeast research.

[38]  E. Louis,et al.  The mismatch repair system reduces meiotic homeologous recombination and stimulates recombination-dependent chromosome loss , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[39]  D. Jacobson,et al.  REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION AND PHYLOGENETIC DIVERGENCE IN NEUROSPORA: COMPARING METHODS OF SPECIES RECOGNITION IN A MODEL EUKARYOTE , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[40]  D. Greig,et al.  Epistasis and hybrid sterility in Saccharomyces , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  Naumov Gi,et al.  Taxonomic identification of Saccharomyces from yeast genetic stock centers of the University of California , 1994 .

[42]  E. Louis,et al.  Two new genetically isolated populations of the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex from Japan. , 1995 .

[43]  J Mallet,et al.  A species definition for the modern synthesis. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[44]  S. Oliver,et al.  Chromosomal evolution in Saccharomyces , 2000, Nature.

[45]  N. Shirley,et al.  Evidence for multiple interspecific hybridization in Saccharomyces sensu stricto species. , 2002, FEMS yeast research.

[46]  H. A. Orr,et al.  The evolutionary genetics of speciation. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[47]  J. Mccusker,et al.  Three new dominant drug resistance cassettes for gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1999, Yeast.