Context effects in spoken word recognition of English and German by native and non -native listeners.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xiii Chapter

[1]  Paul Smolensky,et al.  Grammar-based connectionist approaches to language , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  Ingrid Sonnenstuhl,et al.  Processing and Representation of German -n Plurals: A Dual Mechanism Approach , 2002, Brain and Language.

[3]  A. Baddeley.  Human Memory: Theory and Practice, Revised Edition , 1990 .

[4]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Effects of Syllable Frequency and Syllable Neighborhood Frequency in Visual Word Recognition , 1998 .

[5]  P. Boersma.  Praat : doing phonetics by computer (version 4.4.24) , 2006 .

[6]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Michael S Vitevitch,et al.  A Web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[8]  B. Rapp,et al.  Lexical and post-lexical phonological representations in spoken production , 2007, Cognition.

[9]  T. M. Nearey.  Phoneme-like units and speech perception , 2001 .

[10]  Michael S. Vitevitch.  The clustering coefficient of phonological neighborhoods influences spoken word recognition , 2006 .

[11]  U. Hahn,et al.  German Inflection: Single Route or Dual Route? , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  Harvey b. Fletcher,et al.  Speech and hearing in communication , 1953 .

[13]  A. Weber,et al.  Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition , 2004 .

[14]  Gary F. Marcus,et al.  German Inflection: The Exception That Proves the Rule , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Similarity Avoidance and the OCP , 2004 .

[16]  David B Pisoni,et al.  Perception of Wordlikeness: Effects of Segment Probability and Length on the Processing of Nonwords. , 2000, Journal of memory and language.

[17]  W O Olsen,et al.  Phoneme and Word Recognition for Words in Isolation and in Sentences , 1997, Ear and hearing.

[18]  G. McRoberts,et al.  Infant Perception of Non-Native Consonant Contrasts that Adults Assimilate in Different Ways , 2003, Language and speech.

[19]  P. Zwitserlood,et al.  A chatterbox is a box: Morphology in German word production , 2006 .

[20]  John Coleman,et al.  Stochastic phonological grammars and acceptability , 1997, SIGMORPHON@EACL.

[21]  José Benkí,et al.  Analysis of English Nonsense Syllable Recognition in Noise , 2003, Phonetica.

[22]  James D. Harnsberger,et al.  Language-specific patterns of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: acoustic structures and their perceptual correlates , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[23]  A. Samuel.  Phonemic restoration: insights from a new methodology. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  Manfred Bierwisch,et al.  SYNTACTIC FEATURES IN MORPHOLOGY: GENERAL PROBLEMS OF SO-CALLED PRONOMINAL INFLECTION IN GERMAN , 2008 .

[25]  H. Clahsen,et al.  Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[26]  J. Hyönä,et al.  Lexical access routes to nouns in a morphologically rich language , 1999 .

[27]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Talker-specific learning in speech perception , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  G. A. Miller,et al.  An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .

[29]  R. Smits,et al.  Patterns of English phoneme confusions by native and non-native listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On learning the past-tenses of English verbs: implicit rules or parallel distributed processing , 1986 .

[31]  V. Marchman,et al.  U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perception: Implications for child language acquisition , 1991, Cognition.

[32]  K I Forster,et al.  No enemies in the neighborhood: absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  Decomposition: To What Extent? The Case of Turkish , 1999, Brain and Language.

[34]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Effects of Clustering Coefficient on Spoken Word Recognition 1 , 2007 .

[35]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[36]  S. Lupker,et al.  Phonological effects in visual word recognition: investigating the impact of feedback activation. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  R Frost,et al.  Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: true issues and false trails. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[39]  H. Rubenstein,et al.  Homographic entries in the internal lexicon , 1970 .

[40]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Sequencing in SLA , 1996, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[41]  Broadbent De.  Word-frequency effect and response bias. , 1967 .

[42]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words , 1975 .

[43]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? , 2000 .

[44]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[45]  S. Pinker,et al.  On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition , 1988, Cognition.

[46]  Caroline L. Smith.  Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: a guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet (1999). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. ix+204. , 2000, Phonology.

[47]  B. Lindblom,et al.  Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels , 1994 .

[48]  L. Feldman,et al.  What do graded effects of semantic transparency reveal about morphological processing? , 2004, Brain and Language.

[49]  Terrance M. Nearey.  Phonetic Interpretation Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI: On the factorability of phonological units in speech perception , 2004 .

[50]  H. Clahsen,et al.  The Mental Representation of Inflected Words: An Experimental Study of Adjectives and Verbs in German , 2001 .

[51]  P. Luce.  Neighborhoods of words in the mental lexicon , 1986 .

[52]  H. Rubenstein,et al.  Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition , 1971 .

[53]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[54]  Tamiko Azuma,et al.  Puzzle-solving science: the quixotic quest for units in speech perception , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[55]  W. Ganong.  Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[56]  M. Taft.  Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect , 1979, Memory & cognition.

[57]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: talker-, listener-, and item-related factors. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[58]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Morphological Structure in the Chinese Mental Lexicon , 1995 .

[59]  J. Blevins.  Syncretism and paradigmatic opposition , 1995 .

[60]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. , 2004, Psychological review.

[61]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Semantic Density and Past-Tense Formation in Three Germanic Languages , 2005 .

[62]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Regular morphology and the lexicon. , 1995 .

[63]  S. Andrews.  Morphological influences on lexical access: Lexical or nonlexical effects? , 1986 .

[64]  Sébastien Miellet,et al.  Activation of Phonological Codes during Reading: Evidence from Errors Detection and Eye Movements , 2002, Brain and Language.

[65]  A. Jongman,et al.  Processing of English inflectional morphology , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[66]  Grover Hudson,et al.  PHONOLOGY AND LANGUAGE USE , 2004 .

[67]  W. Marslen-Wilson.  Access to lexical representations: Cross-linguistic issues , 2001 .

[68]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[69]  B. Hayes,et al.  Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study , 2003, Cognition.

[70]  C. Pallier,et al.  The Influence of Native-Language Phonology on Lexical Access: Exemplar-Based Versus Abstract Lexical Entries , 2001, Psychological science.

[71]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[72]  Vsevolod Kapatsinski,et al.  Sound Similarity Relations in the Mental Lexicon: Modeling the Lexicon as a Complex Network 1 , 2005 .

[73]  J. Flege,et al.  Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition of native and Spanish-accented words by native English and Spanish listeners. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[74]  José Benkí.  Quantitative evaluation of lexical status, word frequency, and neighborhood density as context effects in spoken word recognition. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[75]  D. Norris,et al.  The relative accessibility of phonemes and syllables , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[76]  P. Luce,et al.  When Words Compete: Levels of Processing in Perception of Spoken Words , 1998 .

[77]  T. Bever,et al.  The nonperceptual reality of the phoneme. , 1970 .

[78]  Jutta L. Mueller,et al.  Morphological Processing in a Second Language: Behavioral and Event-related Brain Potential Evidence for Storage and Decomposition , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[79]  U. Frauenfelder,et al.  The Role of the Syllable in Language Acquisition and Perception , 1981 .

[80]  Nivja H. de Jong,et al.  The morphological family size effect and morphology , 2000 .

[81]  Arnold M. Zwicky,et al.  The General Case: Basic Form versus Default Form , 1986 .

[82]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Replicating syllable frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition , 2004 .

[83]  M. Taft.  A morphological-decomposition model of lexical representation , 1988 .

[84]  A. Boothroyd,et al.  Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[85]  Cynthia G. Clopper,et al.  Effects of open-set and closed-set task demands on spoken word recognition. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[86]  H. Clahsen,et al.  Speeded production of inflected words in children and adults , 2004, Journal of Child Language.

[87]  Maria-Luise Beck.  Regular verbs, past tense and frequency: tracking down a potential source of NS/NNS competence differences , 1997 .

[88]  Juhani Järvikivi,et al.  Counterintuitive Cross-Linguistic Differences: More Morphological Computation in English Than in Finnish , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[89]  D. Norris.  Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition , 1994, Cognition.

[90]  R. Dodge.  The apperception of the spoken sentence: A study in the psychology of language. , 2022 .

[91]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Speech Perception as a Talker-Contingent Process , 1993, Psychological science.

[92]  D. Balota,et al.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[93]  D. Broadbent.  Word-frequency effect and response bias. , 1967, Psychological review.

[94]  P. Luce,et al.  Probabilistic Phonotactics and Neighborhood Activation in Spoken Word Recognition , 1999 .

[95]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical Access and Naming Time. , 1973 .

[96]  K. Hugdahl,et al.  Neural correlates of morphological decomposition in a morphologically rich language: An fMRI study , 2006, Brain and Language.

[97]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Lexical Representation of Compound Words--Cross-Linguistic Evidence , 2000 .

[98]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Memory for language , 2001 .

[99]  A Boothroyd,et al.  Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children and older adults. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[100]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Implementations are not conceptualizations: Revising the verb learning model , 1991, Cognition.

[101]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Generalisation of regular and irregular morphological patterns , 1993 .

[102]  W. Marslen-Wilson.  Accessing Spoken Words : The Importance of Word Onsets , 2004 .

[103]  J. Sawusch,et al.  Lexical neighborhood effects in phonetic processing. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[104]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Words and rules , 1998 .

[105]  F. Meunier,et al.  Morphological decomposition and semantic integration in word processing , 2007 .

[106]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: what does the evidence rule out? , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[107]  Kenneth N. Stevens,et al.  On the quantal nature of speech , 1972 .

[108]  J. Gierut,et al.  Comparability of Lexical Corpora: Word frequency in phonological generalization , 2007, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[109]  R. Baayen,et al.  Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model , 1997 .

[110]  R. Lado,et al.  Linguistics Across Cultures: Applied Linguistics for Language Teachers , 1957 .

[111]  J. Flege.  Production and perception of a novel, second-language phonetic contrast. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[112]  M. Schroeder.  Reference Signal for Signal Quality Studies , 1968 .

[113]  Michael Ramscar.  The role of meaning in inflection: Why the past tense does not require a rule , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[114]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[115]  D Norris,et al.  Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[116]  Todd M. Bailey,et al.  Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods? , 2001 .

[117]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Resonant neural dynamics of speech perception , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[118]  G. Zipf.  The Psycho-Biology Of Language: AN INTRODUCTION TO DYNAMIC PHILOLOGY , 1999 .

[119]  J. Blevins.  Markedness and Blocking in German Declensional Paradigms , 2007 .

[120]  H. Nusbaum.  Sizing up the Hoosier Mental Lexicon: Measuring the Familiarity of 20,000 Words, Research on Speech Perception , 1984 .

[121]  A. Collins.  The Psychology of Memory. , 2001 .

[122]  Michael S Vitevitch,et al.  The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[123]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Serial Order in Planning the Production of Successive Morphemes of a Word , 1996 .

[124]  K. Plunkett,et al.  A cross-linguistic comparison of single and dual-route models of inflectional morphology , 2000 .