Adults' use of subtraction by addition.

The present study investigates adults' use of addition to solve two-digit subtractions. Inspired by research on single-digit arithmetic, we first examined regression models in which different problem characteristics predicted participants' reaction times. Second, we compared performance on two-digit subtractions presented in 2 presentation formats, i.e., the standard subtraction format (81-37=.) and an addition format (37+.=81). Both methods lead to the conclusion that the participants switched between direct subtraction and subtraction by addition depending on the relative size of the subtrahend: If the subtrahend was smaller than the difference, direct subtraction was mainly used; if the subtrahend was larger than the difference, subtraction by addition was the dominant strategy. However, this performance pattern was only observed when the distance between the subtrahend and the difference was large; when the subtrahend and the difference were close to each other, there was no subtrahend-dependent selection of direct subtraction vs. subtraction by addition. These data indicate that theoretical models of people's strategy choices in subtraction should include the relative size of the subtrahend as an important factor in the strategy selection process.

[1]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Solving subtractions adaptively by means of indirect addition: influence of task, subject, and instructional factors , 2009 .

[2]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Whole number concepts and operations , 2007 .

[3]  Jo-Anne LeFevre,et al.  Selection of procedures in mental subtraction. , 2006, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[4]  A. Dowker Use of derived fact strategies by children with mathematical difficulties , 2009 .

[5]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Acquisition and use of shortcut strategies by traditionally schooled children , 2009 .

[6]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Using addition to solve large subtractions in the number domain up to 20. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[7]  Koeno Gravemeijer,et al.  The role of contexts and models in the development of mathematical strategies and procedures , 1997 .

[8]  A. W. Blöte,et al.  Mental computation and conceptual understanding , 2000 .

[9]  Roberto Araya,et al.  A computational model of conscious and unconscious strategy discovery. , 2005, Advances in child development and behavior.

[10]  Pierre Barrouillet,et al.  Strategies in subtraction problem solving in children. , 2008, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[11]  L. Verschaffel,et al.  Conceptualizing, investigating, and enhancing adaptive expertise in elementary mathematics education , 2009 .

[12]  M. Ashcraft,et al.  Telling stories: the perils and promise of using verbal reports to study math strategies. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  Cognitive arithmetic across cultures. , 2001 .

[14]  Guy J. Groen,et al.  Subtraction and the solution of open sentence problems , 1973 .

[15]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Efficiency and flexibility of indirect addition in the domain of multi-digit subtraction , 2009 .

[16]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Frequency, efficiency and flexibility of indirect addition in two learning environments , 2010 .

[17]  Meindert Beishuizen,et al.  MENTAL ARITHMETIC AND STRATEGY USE WITH INDIRECT NUMBER PROBLEMS UP TO ONE HUNDRED , 1997 .

[18]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: the numerical distance effect and individual differences in children's mathematics achievement. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[19]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  Subtraction by addition , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Jo-Anne LeFevre,et al.  Effects of problem format on division and multiplication performance: division facts are mediated via multiplication-based representations. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Symbolic arithmetic knowledge without instruction , 2007, Nature.

[22]  Katherine M. Robinson,et al.  The validity of verbal reports in children's subtraction , 2001 .

[23]  R. Brissiaud,et al.  Teaching and development: Solving “missing addend” problems using subtraction , 1994 .

[24]  D. Geary,et al.  Simple and complex mental subtraction: strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in younger and older adults. , 1993, Psychology and aging.

[25]  M. Ashcraft Cognitive arithmetic: A review of data and theory , 1992, Cognition.

[26]  Patricia Howlin,et al.  Origins of cognitive skills , 1986 .

[27]  E. Corte,et al.  The Effect of Semantic Structure on First Graders' Strategies for Solving Addition and Subtraction Word Problems. , 1987 .

[28]  Christoph Selter,et al.  Addition and Subtraction of Three-digit Numbers: German Elementary Children's Success, Methods and Strategies , 2001 .

[29]  L. Verschaffel,et al.  The predictive value of numerical magnitude comparison for individual differences in mathematics achievement. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[30]  Frank Domahs,et al.  To carry or not to carry--is this the question? Disentangling the carry effect in multi-digit addition. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[31]  Mark H. Ashcraft,et al.  The development of mental arithmetic: A chronometric approach☆ , 1982 .

[32]  Karen C. Fuson,et al.  Research on whole number addition and subtraction. , 1992 .

[33]  Guy J. Groen,et al.  An Experimental Test of Five Process Models for Subtraction. , 1975 .