GEODATA IN SCIENCE – A REVIEW OF SELECTED SCIENTIFIC FIELDS
暂无分享,去创建一个
M. Jakubiak | P. Lewińska | Karolina Krzykowska-Piotrowska | Mariusz Specht | A. Krawczyk | Łukasz Marchel | S. Nistor | Michal Apollo | K. Maciuk | Agnieszka Pęska-Siwik | Łukasz Borowski | M. Kardoš
[1] S. Bacior. Austrian Cadastre still in use – Example proceedings to determine the legal status of land property in southern Poland , 2023, Land Use Policy.
[2] J. Gołąb,et al. Implementation of the EVRF2007 height reference frame in Poland , 2023, Journal of Applied Geodesy.
[3] Ayyoob Sharifi,et al. Optimal site selection for the solar-wind hybrid renewable energy systems in Bangladesh using an integrated GIS-based BWM-fuzzy logic method , 2023, Energy Conversion and Management.
[4] R. Stewart,et al. Integrated GIS-AHP-based approach for off-river pumped hydro energy storage site selection , 2023, Applied Energy.
[5] B. Pradhan,et al. A Comprehensive Review of Geospatial Technology Applications in Earthquake Preparedness, Emergency Management, and Damage Assessment , 2023, Remote. Sens..
[6] B. Federici,et al. Deriving Coastal Shallow Bathymetry from Sentinel 2-, Aircraft- and UAV-Derived Orthophotos: A Case Study in Ligurian Marinas , 2023, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering.
[7] Hassan Chaachouay,et al. A bibliometric review of geospatial analyses and artificial intelligence literature in agriculture , 2023, GeoJournal.
[8] Jacob J. Lin,et al. Characterizing Data Sharing in Civil Infrastructure Engineering: Current Practice, Future Vision, Barriers, and Promotion Strategies , 2023, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..
[9] M. Fabris,et al. Expeditious Low-Cost SfM Photogrammetry and a TLS Survey for the Structural Analysis of Illasi Castle (Italy) , 2023, Drones.
[10] Mihai Daniel Niţă,et al. Measuring Forest Height from Space. Opportunities and Limitations Observed in Natural Forests , 2023, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[11] Vasil Cvetkov. Two adjustments of the second levelling of Finland by using nonconventional weights , 2023, Journal of Geodetic Science.
[12] D. Barton,et al. Making trees visible: a GIS method and tool for modelling visibility in the valuation of urban trees , 2023, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.
[13] M. Portman,et al. A review of geospatial technologies for improving Marine Spatial Planning: Challenges and opportunities , 2023, Ocean & Coastal Management.
[14] A. Szafarczyk,et al. The Use of Green Laser in LiDAR Bathymetry: State of the Art and Recent Advancements , 2022, Sensors.
[15] Sudhir Kumar Singh,et al. Hydrological Modelling and Climate Adaptation under Changing Climate: A Review with a Focus in Sub-Saharan Africa , 2022, Water.
[16] C. Specht,et al. Assessment of the Steering Precision of a UAV along the Flight Profiles Using a GNSS RTK Receiver , 2022, Remote. Sens..
[17] J. Voltas,et al. UAV-LiDAR and RGB Imagery Reveal Large Intraspecific Variation in Tree-Level Morphometric Traits across Different Pine Species Evaluated in Common Gardens , 2022, Remote. Sens..
[18] A. Franczyk,et al. Monitoring Subsidence Area with the Use of Satellite Radar Images and Deep Transfer Learning , 2022, Sensors.
[19] G. Hasan,et al. Monitoring bank-line movements of the rivers flowing across the Sundarbans using remote sensing and GIS techniques , 2022, Regional Studies in Marine Science.
[20] M. Schimmel,et al. Radar Interferometry as a Monitoring Tool for an Active Mining Area Using Sentinel-1 C-Band Data, Case Study of Riotinto Mine , 2022, Remote. Sens..
[21] Kerstin Ostermann,et al. Geodata in labor market research: trends, potentials and perspectives , 2022, Journal for Labour Market Research.
[22] F. Chiabrando,et al. NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN LIDAR UAS SURVEYS. PERFORMANCE ANALYSES AND VALIDATION OF THE DJI ZENMUSE L1 , 2022, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences.
[23] W. Nijland,et al. Improving UAV-SfM time-series accuracy by co-alignment and contributions of ground control or RTK positioning , 2022, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.
[24] K. Gardner,et al. UAV and Structure-From-Motion Photogrammetry Enhance River Restoration Monitoring: A Dam Removal Study , 2022, Drones.
[25] E. Casella,et al. Assessing the relative accuracy of coral heights reconstructed from drones and structure from motion photogrammetry on coral reefs , 2022, Coral Reefs.
[26] Komlavi Akpoti,et al. INTEGRATED MODELING OF HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES AND GROUNDWATER RECHARGE BASED ON LAND USE LAND COVER, AND CLIMATE CHANGES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW , 2022, Environmental Advances.
[27] Yanxiong Liu,et al. Development of a single-wavelength airborne bathymetric LiDAR: System design and data processing , 2022, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
[28] C. Specht,et al. Analysis of Methods for Determining Shallow Waterbody Depths Based on Images Taken by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2022, Sensors.
[29] P. Blunt,et al. Performance Analysis of Zero-Difference GPS L1/L2/L5 and Galileo E1/E5a/E5b/E6 Point Positioning Using CNES Uncombined Bias Products , 2022, Remote. Sens..
[30] Jakub Kuna. The Orthophotomap of Lublin 1944: from Luftwaffe photographs to map application – idea, methods, contemporary challenges of processing and publishing archival aerial photographs , 2022, Polish Cartographical Review.
[31] A. Badea,et al. GIS-Based Survey over the Public Transport Strategy: An Instrument for Economic and Sustainable Urban Traffic Planning , 2021, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..
[32] M. Balawejder,et al. Effects of land consolidation in Southern Poland , 2021, Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum.
[33] Rudolf Urban,et al. A New Method for UAV Lidar Precision Testing Used for the Evaluation of an Affordable DJI ZENMUSE L1 Scanner , 2021, Remote. Sens..
[34] F. Biljecki,et al. Street view imagery in urban analytics and GIS: A review , 2021 .
[35] Piotr Banasik,et al. Georeferencing the Cadastral Map of the Krakow Region , 2021, The Cartographic Journal.
[36] R. Olszewski,et al. Digital Agora – Knowledge acquisition from spatial databases, geoinformation society VGI and social media data , 2021 .
[37] Enda Cummins,et al. State of the art review of Big Data and web-based Decision Support Systems (DSS) for food safety risk assessment with respect to climate change , 2021, Trends in Food Science & Technology.
[38] J. Hu,et al. Improving accuracy of local geoid model using machine learning approaches and residuals of GPS/levelling geoid height , 2021, Survey Review.
[39] Arkadiusz Kampczyk,et al. The Fundamental Approach of the Digital Twin Application in Railway Turnouts with Innovative Monitoring of Weather Conditions , 2021, Sensors.
[40] R. Hejmanowski,et al. Estimation of Mining-Induced Horizontal Strain Tensor of Land Surface Applying InSAR , 2021, Minerals.
[41] M. Štroner,et al. Suitability of Aerial Photogrammetry for Dump Documentation and Volume Determination in Large Areas , 2021, Applied Sciences.
[42] W. Shen,et al. Determination of the height of Mount Everest using the shallow layer method , 2021, Geodesy and Geodynamics.
[43] Sayed Ishaq Deliry,et al. Accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Systems Photogrammetry and Structure from Motion in Surveying and Mapping: A Review , 2021, Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing.
[44] Kamil Maciuk,et al. Characteristics of Onefold Clocks of GPS, Galileo, BeiDou and GLONASS Systems , 2021, Sensors.
[45] Ningbo Wang,et al. Real-time GNSS precise point positioning for low-cost smart devices , 2021, GPS Solutions.
[46] J. Xia,et al. Application of LiDAR UAV for High-Resolution Flood Modelling , 2021, Water Resources Management.
[47] R. Dubayah,et al. Fusing simulated GEDI, ICESat-2 and NISAR data for regional aboveground biomass mapping , 2021, Remote Sensing of Environment.
[48] Farid Javadnejad,et al. Dense Point Cloud Quality Factor as Proxy for Accuracy Assessment of Image-Based 3D Reconstruction , 2021 .
[49] Stephanie A. Bohlman,et al. Individual tree detection using UAV-lidar and UAV-SfM data: A tutorial for beginners , 2021, Open Geosciences.
[50] Sarah Child,et al. Structure-From-Motion Photogrammetry of Antarctic Historical Aerial Photographs in Conjunction with Ground Control Derived from Satellite Data , 2020, Remote. Sens..
[51] I. Basista,et al. Assessment of selected land consolidation in south-eastern Poland , 2020 .
[52] P. Marsh,et al. ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF LATE WINTER SNOW DEPTH MAPPING FOR TUNDRA ENVIRONMENTS USING STRUCTURE-FROM-MOTION PHOTOGRAMMETRY , 2020 .
[53] Saeid Homayouni,et al. Meta-analysis of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery for Agro-environmental Monitoring Using Machine Learning and Statistical Models , 2020, Remote. Sens..
[54] Scott C. Hagen,et al. Estimating wave attenuation at the coastal land margin with a GIS toolbox , 2020, Environ. Model. Softw..
[55] T. Santhanavanich,et al. THE USE OF 3D GEOVISUALIZATION AND CROWDSOURCING FOR OPTIMIZING ENERGY SIMULATION , 2020 .
[56] Yana Wengel,et al. Peak-bagging and cartographic misrepresentations: a call to correction , 2020 .
[57] Ricardo Trezza,et al. METRIC-GIS: An advanced energy balance model for computing crop evapotranspiration in a GIS environment , 2020, Environ. Model. Softw..
[58] Krzysztof Sośnica,et al. Evolution of orbit and clock quality for real-time multi-GNSS solutions , 2020, GPS Solutions.
[59] Torsten Mayer-Gürr,et al. GOCO06s – a satellite-only global gravity field model , 2020, Earth System Science Data.
[60] Cezary Specht,et al. The Use of USV to Develop Navigational and Bathymetric Charts of Yacht Ports on the Example of National Sailing Centre in Gdańsk , 2020, Remote. Sens..
[61] Ł. Kowalski,et al. Exploring a non-existent city via historical GIS system by the example of the Jewish district ‘Podzamcze’ in Lublin (Poland) , 2020 .
[62] Alain J. Chiaradia,et al. sDNA: 3-d spatial network analysis for GIS, CAD, Command Line & Python , 2020, SoftwareX.
[63] Jaakko Mäkinen,et al. The permanent tide and the International Height Reference Frame IHRF , 2020, Journal of Geodesy.
[64] B. Zeng,et al. Stereo RGB and Deeper LIDAR-Based Network for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
[65] Xiao Hua Wang,et al. Propagated Uncertainty Models Arising From Device, Environment, and Target for a Small Laser Spot Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry and its Verification in the South China Sea , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.
[66] Alberto Pellegrinelli,et al. Coastal Mapping Using DJI Phantom 4 RTK in Post-Processing Kinematic Mode , 2020, Drones.
[67] Ákos Halmai,et al. Applicability of a Recreational-Grade Interferometric Sonar for the Bathymetric Survey and Monitoring of the Drava River , 2020, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..
[68] Pawel Burdziakowski,et al. Increasing the Geometrical and Interpretation Quality of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Photogrammetry Products using Super-Resolution Algorithms , 2020, Remote. Sens..
[69] M. Peppa,et al. Advances and Challenges of UAV SFM MVS Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing: Short Review , 2020, 2020 IEEE Latin American GRSS & ISPRS Remote Sensing Conference (LAGIRS).
[70] Helena Mitasova,et al. Open Geospatial Software and Data: A Review of the Current State and A Perspective into the Future , 2020, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..
[71] Sergio Iván Jiménez-Jiménez,et al. Rapid urban flood damage assessment using high resolution remote sensing data and an object-based approach , 2020 .
[72] Yi-Chun Lin,et al. Evaluation of UAV LiDAR for Mapping Coastal Environments , 2019, Remote. Sens..
[73] G. Asner,et al. Adaptive bathymetry estimation for shallow coastal waters using Planet Dove satellites , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.
[74] Georg Heygster,et al. Monitoring Beach Topography and Nearshore Bathymetry Using Spaceborne Remote Sensing: A Review , 2019, Remote. Sens..
[75] Ami Hassan Md Din,et al. Evaluating Water Level Changes at Different Tidal Phases Using UAV Photogrammetry and GNSS Vertical Data , 2019, Sensors.
[76] Ram Avtar,et al. Improved Bathymetric Mapping of Coastal and Lake Environments Using Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 Images , 2019, Sensors.
[77] S. Jombach,et al. Towards three decades of spatial development transformation in two contrasting post-Soviet cities—Kraków and Budapest , 2019, Land Use Policy.
[78] Harald Schuh,et al. ICGEM – 15 years of successful collection and distribution of global gravitational models, associated services, and future plans , 2019, Earth System Science Data.
[79] S. Lane,et al. Comparison of remote sensing based approaches for mapping bathymetry of shallow, clear water rivers , 2019, Geomorphology.
[80] Cezary Specht,et al. A New Method for Determining the Territorial Sea Baseline Using an Unmanned, Hydrographic Surface Vessel , 2019, Journal of Coastal Research.
[81] Barbara Ubaldi,et al. Open Government Data , 2019, Government at a Glance: Latin America and the Caribbean 2020.
[82] Dimitrios Skarlatos,et al. Shallow Water Bathymetry Mapping from UAV Imagery based on Machine Learning , 2019, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences.
[83] J. Awange,et al. Geodata and Geoinformatics , 2018, Environmental Geoinformatics.
[84] Enoc Sanz-Ablanedo,et al. Accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and SfM Photogrammetry Survey as a Function of the Number and Location of Ground Control Points Used , 2018, Remote. Sens..
[85] Kuo-Hsin Tseng,et al. A UAV–RTK Lidar System for Wave and Tide Measurements in Coastal Zones , 2018, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology.
[86] Takashi Matsubara,et al. Advantages of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry for landscape analysis compared with satellite data: A case study of postmining sites in Indonesia , 2018 .
[87] Piotr Banasik,et al. The Use of Quasigeoid in Leveling Through Terrain Obstacles , 2017 .
[88] Krystyna Michalowska,et al. Use of LIDAR Data in the 3D/4D Analyses of the Krakow Fortress Objects , 2017 .
[89] F. Morsdorf,et al. UAV-based LiDAR acquisition for the derivation of high-resolution forest and ground information , 2017 .
[90] Mark Pesce,et al. The Web-Wide World , 2017, WWW.
[91] Adam Weintrit,et al. Determination of the Territorial Sea Baseline - Aspect of Using Unmanned Hydrographic Vessels , 2016 .
[92] A. Hernández-Vásquez,et al. [Geographic information systems]. , 2016, Revista peruana de medicina experimental y salud publica.
[93] R. Sadler. Integrating expert knowledge in a GIS to optimize siting decisions for small-scale healthy food retail interventions , 2016, International Journal of Health Geographics.
[94] Sorin Nistor,et al. Using Different Mapping Function In GPS Processing For Remote Sensing The Atmosphere , 2015 .
[95] Bin Jiang,et al. Geospatial Big Data Handling Theory and Methods: A Review and Research Challenges , 2015, ArXiv.
[96] Lionel Benoit,et al. Monitoring landslide displacements with the Geocube wireless network of low-cost GPS , 2015 .
[97] A. Juhász,et al. Detecting Military Historical Objects by LiDAR Data , 2015, Academic and Applied Research in Military and Public Management Science.
[98] J. Gonçalves,et al. UAV photogrammetry for topographic monitoring of coastal areas , 2015 .
[99] Jean-Charles Marty,et al. ESA's satellite‐only gravity field model via the direct approach based on all GOCE data , 2014 .
[100] Vincent Myers,et al. Coherence estimation for repeat-pass interferometry , 2014, 2014 Oceans - St. John's.
[101] Lucía Díaz-Vilariño,et al. Lidar-equipped uav for building information modelling , 2014 .
[102] Tomasz Templin,et al. Application of Integrated GNSS/Hydroacoustic Measurements and GIS Geodatabase Models for Bottom Analysis of Lake Hancza: the Deepest Inland Reservoir in Poland , 2014, Pure and Applied Geophysics.
[103] Walyeldeen Godah. EVALUATION OF RECENT GOCE GEOPOTENTIAL MODELS OVER THE AREA OF POLAND , 2013 .
[104] Michael F. Goodchild,et al. The quality of big (geo)data , 2013 .
[105] Ari Huusko,et al. Assessing Habitat Suitability for Juvenile Atlantic Salmon in Relation to In‐Stream Restoration and Discharge Variability , 2013 .
[106] F. Fava,et al. DEM extraction from archive aerial photos: accuracy assessment in areas of complex topography , 2013 .
[107] D. U. Sanli,et al. ON THE PERFORMANCE OF GNSS LEVELLING OVER STEEP SLOPES , 2012 .
[108] J. Ihde,et al. Unification of European height system realizations , 2012 .
[109] A. Łyszkowicz,et al. STATUS AND STATISTICAL PROPERTIES OF THE PRECISE LEVELLING NETWORKS IN POLAND , 2012 .
[110] M. Goodchild,et al. Researching Volunteered Geographic Information: Spatial Data, Geographic Research, and New Social Practice , 2012 .
[111] N. K. Pavlis,et al. The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008) , 2012 .
[112] Russ Burtner,et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH GEOGRAPHICS REVIEW Open Access , 2022 .
[113] Maarten G. Kleinhans,et al. Philosophy of Earth Science , 2010 .
[114] T. Cole,et al. Geographies Of The Holocaust , 2009, A Companion to the Holocaust.
[115] S. Ses,et al. The Second Precise Levelling Network of Peninsular Malaysia , 2009 .
[116] W. Reid,et al. Earth System Research Priorities , 2009, Science.
[117] Jean Chery,et al. Monitoring of the large slow Kahrod landslide in Alborz mountain range (Iran) by GPS and SAR interferometry , 2008 .
[118] E. Chapin,et al. Along-track interferometry for ground moving target indication , 2008, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine.
[119] P. Clarke. GPS Satellite Surveying , 2007 .
[120] Manfred Zink,et al. Interferometric alignment of the X-SAR antenna system on the space shuttle radar topography mission , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..
[121] K. Richards,et al. Developments in monitoring and modelling small‐scale river bed topography , 1994 .
[122] C. Werner,et al. Satellite radar interferometry: Two-dimensional phase unwrapping , 1988 .
[123] Bruce MacVicar,et al. Stream power index for networks (SPIN) toolbox for decision support in urbanizing watersheds , 2021, Environ. Model. Softw..
[124] L. Taha,et al. Assessment of Approaches for the Extraction of Building Footprints from Pléiades Images , 2021, Geomatics and Environmental Engineering.
[125] A. Kopec,et al. LONG-TERM MONITORING OF THE IMPACT OF MINING OPERATIONS ON THE GROUND SURFACE AT THE REGIONAL SCALE BASED ON THE INSAR-SBAS TECHNIQUE, THE UPPER SILESIAN COAL BASIN (POLAND). CASE STUDY , 2021 .
[126] C. Okolie,et al. AN ASSESSMENT OF THE ACCURACY OF STRUCTURE-FROM-MOTION (SFM) PHOTOGRAMMETRY FOR 3D TERRAIN MAPPING , 2020, Geomatics, Landmanagement and Landscape.
[127] Nicola Casagli,et al. Integration of GNSS and Satellite InSAR Data: Derivation of Fine-Scale Vertical Surface Motion Maps of Po Plain, Northern Apennines, and Southern Alps, Italy , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.
[128] P. Wielgosz,et al. Research on GNSS positioning and applications in Poland in 2015–2018 , 2019 .
[129] R. Kadaj. Transformations between the height reference frames: Kronsztadt'60, PL-KRON86-NH, PL-EVRF2007-NH , 2018 .
[130] Kamil Maciuk,et al. Different approaches in GLONASS orbit computation from broadcast ephemeris , 2016 .
[131] A. Darzi,et al. Smartphones let surgeons know WhatsApp: an analysis of communication in emergency surgical teams. , 2015, American Journal of Surgery.
[132] James Norris,et al. Future trends in geospatial information management: the five to ten year vision , 2015 .
[133] Pradip M. Jawandhiya,et al. Review of Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) , 2013 .
[134] Qin Zhang,et al. Real-time clock offset prediction with an improved model , 2013, GPS Solutions.
[135] J. Rapiński,et al. Adjustment of vertical crustal movement network on the basis of last three leveling campaigns in Poland , 2012 .
[136] N. K. Pavlis,et al. The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 ( EGM 2008 ) , 2012 .
[137] Mehdi Eshagh,et al. PERTURBATIONS IN ORBITAL ELEMENTS OF A LOW EARTH ORBITING SATELLITE , 2007 .
[138] I. Gajderowicz. Ocena dokładności krajowej sieci niwelacji precyzyjnej I klasy pomierzonej w latach 1997-2003 , 2005 .
[139] A. S. Walker,et al. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry , Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences , 2004 .
[140] N. Rožić. Fundamental levelling networks and height datums at the territory of the Republic of Croatia , 2001 .
[141] E. Lambin. Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems Analysis , 2001 .
[142] Iho. IHO STANDARDS FOR HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEYS , 1998 .
[143] R. Congalton. Exploring and Evaluating the Consequences of Vector-to-Raster and Raster-to-Vector Conversion , 1997 .