GEODATA IN SCIENCE – A REVIEW OF SELECTED SCIENTIFIC FIELDS

Aim of the study: Today, completely new forms of geo-information systems are becoming increasingly popular. New technological possibilities allow these systems to be adapted to the requirements and needs of societies. This paper is an extensive literature review of the use of geodata in various scientific fields, in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) disciplines. However, as there is no universal agreement as to which disciplines are included in the STEM, the authors also included related fields such as geography or transport. Material and methods: Already a preliminary analysis of the Web of Science Core Collection database has shown that geodata is used very widely, in every scientific discipline analysed (with varying degrees of sophistication). The main objective of the paper is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the usage of geodata in five areas: bathymetric measurements, satellite geodata, aerial retrieved geodata, levelling networks, and GIS data. Results and conclusions: The results showed the increasing availability of data that can contribute to a better understanding and management of our planet. Geodata as a tool is overly broad and general, and it is used or might be used in every discipline of science.

[1]  S. Bacior Austrian Cadastre still in use – Example proceedings to determine the legal status of land property in southern Poland , 2023, Land Use Policy.

[2]  J. Gołąb,et al.  Implementation of the EVRF2007 height reference frame in Poland , 2023, Journal of Applied Geodesy.

[3]  Ayyoob Sharifi,et al.  Optimal site selection for the solar-wind hybrid renewable energy systems in Bangladesh using an integrated GIS-based BWM-fuzzy logic method , 2023, Energy Conversion and Management.

[4]  R. Stewart,et al.  Integrated GIS-AHP-based approach for off-river pumped hydro energy storage site selection , 2023, Applied Energy.

[5]  B. Pradhan,et al.  A Comprehensive Review of Geospatial Technology Applications in Earthquake Preparedness, Emergency Management, and Damage Assessment , 2023, Remote. Sens..

[6]  B. Federici,et al.  Deriving Coastal Shallow Bathymetry from Sentinel 2-, Aircraft- and UAV-Derived Orthophotos: A Case Study in Ligurian Marinas , 2023, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering.

[7]  Hassan Chaachouay,et al.  A bibliometric review of geospatial analyses and artificial intelligence literature in agriculture , 2023, GeoJournal.

[8]  Jacob J. Lin,et al.  Characterizing Data Sharing in Civil Infrastructure Engineering: Current Practice, Future Vision, Barriers, and Promotion Strategies , 2023, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[9]  M. Fabris,et al.  Expeditious Low-Cost SfM Photogrammetry and a TLS Survey for the Structural Analysis of Illasi Castle (Italy) , 2023, Drones.

[10]  Mihai Daniel Niţă,et al.  Measuring Forest Height from Space. Opportunities and Limitations Observed in Natural Forests , 2023, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[11]  Vasil Cvetkov Two adjustments of the second levelling of Finland by using nonconventional weights , 2023, Journal of Geodetic Science.

[12]  D. Barton,et al.  Making trees visible: a GIS method and tool for modelling visibility in the valuation of urban trees , 2023, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.

[13]  M. Portman,et al.  A review of geospatial technologies for improving Marine Spatial Planning: Challenges and opportunities , 2023, Ocean & Coastal Management.

[14]  A. Szafarczyk,et al.  The Use of Green Laser in LiDAR Bathymetry: State of the Art and Recent Advancements , 2022, Sensors.

[15]  Sudhir Kumar Singh,et al.  Hydrological Modelling and Climate Adaptation under Changing Climate: A Review with a Focus in Sub-Saharan Africa , 2022, Water.

[16]  C. Specht,et al.  Assessment of the Steering Precision of a UAV along the Flight Profiles Using a GNSS RTK Receiver , 2022, Remote. Sens..

[17]  J. Voltas,et al.  UAV-LiDAR and RGB Imagery Reveal Large Intraspecific Variation in Tree-Level Morphometric Traits across Different Pine Species Evaluated in Common Gardens , 2022, Remote. Sens..

[18]  A. Franczyk,et al.  Monitoring Subsidence Area with the Use of Satellite Radar Images and Deep Transfer Learning , 2022, Sensors.

[19]  G. Hasan,et al.  Monitoring bank-line movements of the rivers flowing across the Sundarbans using remote sensing and GIS techniques , 2022, Regional Studies in Marine Science.

[20]  M. Schimmel,et al.  Radar Interferometry as a Monitoring Tool for an Active Mining Area Using Sentinel-1 C-Band Data, Case Study of Riotinto Mine , 2022, Remote. Sens..

[21]  Kerstin Ostermann,et al.  Geodata in labor market research: trends, potentials and perspectives , 2022, Journal for Labour Market Research.

[22]  F. Chiabrando,et al.  NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN LIDAR UAS SURVEYS. PERFORMANCE ANALYSES AND VALIDATION OF THE DJI ZENMUSE L1 , 2022, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences.

[23]  W. Nijland,et al.  Improving UAV-SfM time-series accuracy by co-alignment and contributions of ground control or RTK positioning , 2022, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[24]  K. Gardner,et al.  UAV and Structure-From-Motion Photogrammetry Enhance River Restoration Monitoring: A Dam Removal Study , 2022, Drones.

[25]  E. Casella,et al.  Assessing the relative accuracy of coral heights reconstructed from drones and structure from motion photogrammetry on coral reefs , 2022, Coral Reefs.

[26]  Komlavi Akpoti,et al.  INTEGRATED MODELING OF HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES AND GROUNDWATER RECHARGE BASED ON LAND USE LAND COVER, AND CLIMATE CHANGES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW , 2022, Environmental Advances.

[27]  Yanxiong Liu,et al.  Development of a single-wavelength airborne bathymetric LiDAR: System design and data processing , 2022, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[28]  C. Specht,et al.  Analysis of Methods for Determining Shallow Waterbody Depths Based on Images Taken by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2022, Sensors.

[29]  P. Blunt,et al.  Performance Analysis of Zero-Difference GPS L1/L2/L5 and Galileo E1/E5a/E5b/E6 Point Positioning Using CNES Uncombined Bias Products , 2022, Remote. Sens..

[30]  Jakub Kuna The Orthophotomap of Lublin 1944: from Luftwaffe photographs to map application – idea, methods, contemporary challenges of processing and publishing archival aerial photographs , 2022, Polish Cartographical Review.

[31]  A. Badea,et al.  GIS-Based Survey over the Public Transport Strategy: An Instrument for Economic and Sustainable Urban Traffic Planning , 2021, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[32]  M. Balawejder,et al.  Effects of land consolidation in Southern Poland , 2021, Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum.

[33]  Rudolf Urban,et al.  A New Method for UAV Lidar Precision Testing Used for the Evaluation of an Affordable DJI ZENMUSE L1 Scanner , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[34]  F. Biljecki,et al.  Street view imagery in urban analytics and GIS: A review , 2021 .

[35]  Piotr Banasik,et al.  Georeferencing the Cadastral Map of the Krakow Region , 2021, The Cartographic Journal.

[36]  R. Olszewski,et al.  Digital Agora – Knowledge acquisition from spatial databases, geoinformation society VGI and social media data , 2021 .

[37]  Enda Cummins,et al.  State of the art review of Big Data and web-based Decision Support Systems (DSS) for food safety risk assessment with respect to climate change , 2021, Trends in Food Science & Technology.

[38]  J. Hu,et al.  Improving accuracy of local geoid model using machine learning approaches and residuals of GPS/levelling geoid height , 2021, Survey Review.

[39]  Arkadiusz Kampczyk,et al.  The Fundamental Approach of the Digital Twin Application in Railway Turnouts with Innovative Monitoring of Weather Conditions , 2021, Sensors.

[40]  R. Hejmanowski,et al.  Estimation of Mining-Induced Horizontal Strain Tensor of Land Surface Applying InSAR , 2021, Minerals.

[41]  M. Štroner,et al.  Suitability of Aerial Photogrammetry for Dump Documentation and Volume Determination in Large Areas , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[42]  W. Shen,et al.  Determination of the height of Mount Everest using the shallow layer method , 2021, Geodesy and Geodynamics.

[43]  Sayed Ishaq Deliry,et al.  Accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Systems Photogrammetry and Structure from Motion in Surveying and Mapping: A Review , 2021, Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing.

[44]  Kamil Maciuk,et al.  Characteristics of Onefold Clocks of GPS, Galileo, BeiDou and GLONASS Systems , 2021, Sensors.

[45]  Ningbo Wang,et al.  Real-time GNSS precise point positioning for low-cost smart devices , 2021, GPS Solutions.

[46]  J. Xia,et al.  Application of LiDAR UAV for High-Resolution Flood Modelling , 2021, Water Resources Management.

[47]  R. Dubayah,et al.  Fusing simulated GEDI, ICESat-2 and NISAR data for regional aboveground biomass mapping , 2021, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[48]  Farid Javadnejad,et al.  Dense Point Cloud Quality Factor as Proxy for Accuracy Assessment of Image-Based 3D Reconstruction , 2021 .

[49]  Stephanie A. Bohlman,et al.  Individual tree detection using UAV-lidar and UAV-SfM data: A tutorial for beginners , 2021, Open Geosciences.

[50]  Sarah Child,et al.  Structure-From-Motion Photogrammetry of Antarctic Historical Aerial Photographs in Conjunction with Ground Control Derived from Satellite Data , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[51]  I. Basista,et al.  Assessment of selected land consolidation in south-eastern Poland , 2020 .

[52]  P. Marsh,et al.  ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF LATE WINTER SNOW DEPTH MAPPING FOR TUNDRA ENVIRONMENTS USING STRUCTURE-FROM-MOTION PHOTOGRAMMETRY , 2020 .

[53]  Saeid Homayouni,et al.  Meta-analysis of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery for Agro-environmental Monitoring Using Machine Learning and Statistical Models , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[54]  Scott C. Hagen,et al.  Estimating wave attenuation at the coastal land margin with a GIS toolbox , 2020, Environ. Model. Softw..

[55]  T. Santhanavanich,et al.  THE USE OF 3D GEOVISUALIZATION AND CROWDSOURCING FOR OPTIMIZING ENERGY SIMULATION , 2020 .

[56]  Yana Wengel,et al.  Peak-bagging and cartographic misrepresentations: a call to correction , 2020 .

[57]  Ricardo Trezza,et al.  METRIC-GIS: An advanced energy balance model for computing crop evapotranspiration in a GIS environment , 2020, Environ. Model. Softw..

[58]  Krzysztof Sośnica,et al.  Evolution of orbit and clock quality for real-time multi-GNSS solutions , 2020, GPS Solutions.

[59]  Torsten Mayer-Gürr,et al.  GOCO06s – a satellite-only global gravity field model , 2020, Earth System Science Data.

[60]  Cezary Specht,et al.  The Use of USV to Develop Navigational and Bathymetric Charts of Yacht Ports on the Example of National Sailing Centre in Gdańsk , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[61]  Ł. Kowalski,et al.  Exploring a non-existent city via historical GIS system by the example of the Jewish district ‘Podzamcze’ in Lublin (Poland) , 2020 .

[62]  Alain J. Chiaradia,et al.  sDNA: 3-d spatial network analysis for GIS, CAD, Command Line & Python , 2020, SoftwareX.

[63]  Jaakko Mäkinen,et al.  The permanent tide and the International Height Reference Frame IHRF , 2020, Journal of Geodesy.

[64]  B. Zeng,et al.  Stereo RGB and Deeper LIDAR-Based Network for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[65]  Xiao Hua Wang,et al.  Propagated Uncertainty Models Arising From Device, Environment, and Target for a Small Laser Spot Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry and its Verification in the South China Sea , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[66]  Alberto Pellegrinelli,et al.  Coastal Mapping Using DJI Phantom 4 RTK in Post-Processing Kinematic Mode , 2020, Drones.

[67]  Ákos Halmai,et al.  Applicability of a Recreational-Grade Interferometric Sonar for the Bathymetric Survey and Monitoring of the Drava River , 2020, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[68]  Pawel Burdziakowski,et al.  Increasing the Geometrical and Interpretation Quality of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Photogrammetry Products using Super-Resolution Algorithms , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[69]  M. Peppa,et al.  Advances and Challenges of UAV SFM MVS Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing: Short Review , 2020, 2020 IEEE Latin American GRSS & ISPRS Remote Sensing Conference (LAGIRS).

[70]  Helena Mitasova,et al.  Open Geospatial Software and Data: A Review of the Current State and A Perspective into the Future , 2020, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[71]  Sergio Iván Jiménez-Jiménez,et al.  Rapid urban flood damage assessment using high resolution remote sensing data and an object-based approach , 2020 .

[72]  Yi-Chun Lin,et al.  Evaluation of UAV LiDAR for Mapping Coastal Environments , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[73]  G. Asner,et al.  Adaptive bathymetry estimation for shallow coastal waters using Planet Dove satellites , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[74]  Georg Heygster,et al.  Monitoring Beach Topography and Nearshore Bathymetry Using Spaceborne Remote Sensing: A Review , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[75]  Ami Hassan Md Din,et al.  Evaluating Water Level Changes at Different Tidal Phases Using UAV Photogrammetry and GNSS Vertical Data , 2019, Sensors.

[76]  Ram Avtar,et al.  Improved Bathymetric Mapping of Coastal and Lake Environments Using Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 Images , 2019, Sensors.

[77]  S. Jombach,et al.  Towards three decades of spatial development transformation in two contrasting post-Soviet cities—Kraków and Budapest , 2019, Land Use Policy.

[78]  Harald Schuh,et al.  ICGEM – 15 years of successful collection and distribution of global gravitational models, associated services, and future plans , 2019, Earth System Science Data.

[79]  S. Lane,et al.  Comparison of remote sensing based approaches for mapping bathymetry of shallow, clear water rivers , 2019, Geomorphology.

[80]  Cezary Specht,et al.  A New Method for Determining the Territorial Sea Baseline Using an Unmanned, Hydrographic Surface Vessel , 2019, Journal of Coastal Research.

[81]  Barbara Ubaldi,et al.  Open Government Data , 2019, Government at a Glance: Latin America and the Caribbean 2020.

[82]  Dimitrios Skarlatos,et al.  Shallow Water Bathymetry Mapping from UAV Imagery based on Machine Learning , 2019, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences.

[83]  J. Awange,et al.  Geodata and Geoinformatics , 2018, Environmental Geoinformatics.

[84]  Enoc Sanz-Ablanedo,et al.  Accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and SfM Photogrammetry Survey as a Function of the Number and Location of Ground Control Points Used , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[85]  Kuo-Hsin Tseng,et al.  A UAV–RTK Lidar System for Wave and Tide Measurements in Coastal Zones , 2018, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology.

[86]  Takashi Matsubara,et al.  Advantages of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry for landscape analysis compared with satellite data: A case study of postmining sites in Indonesia , 2018 .

[87]  Piotr Banasik,et al.  The Use of Quasigeoid in Leveling Through Terrain Obstacles , 2017 .

[88]  Krystyna Michalowska,et al.  Use of LIDAR Data in the 3D/4D Analyses of the Krakow Fortress Objects , 2017 .

[89]  F. Morsdorf,et al.  UAV-based LiDAR acquisition for the derivation of high-resolution forest and ground information , 2017 .

[90]  Mark Pesce,et al.  The Web-Wide World , 2017, WWW.

[91]  Adam Weintrit,et al.  Determination of the Territorial Sea Baseline - Aspect of Using Unmanned Hydrographic Vessels , 2016 .

[92]  A. Hernández-Vásquez,et al.  [Geographic information systems]. , 2016, Revista peruana de medicina experimental y salud publica.

[93]  R. Sadler Integrating expert knowledge in a GIS to optimize siting decisions for small-scale healthy food retail interventions , 2016, International Journal of Health Geographics.

[94]  Sorin Nistor,et al.  Using Different Mapping Function In GPS Processing For Remote Sensing The Atmosphere , 2015 .

[95]  Bin Jiang,et al.  Geospatial Big Data Handling Theory and Methods: A Review and Research Challenges , 2015, ArXiv.

[96]  Lionel Benoit,et al.  Monitoring landslide displacements with the Geocube wireless network of low-cost GPS , 2015 .

[97]  A. Juhász,et al.  Detecting Military Historical Objects by LiDAR Data , 2015, Academic and Applied Research in Military and Public Management Science.

[98]  J. Gonçalves,et al.  UAV photogrammetry for topographic monitoring of coastal areas , 2015 .

[99]  Jean-Charles Marty,et al.  ESA's satellite‐only gravity field model via the direct approach based on all GOCE data , 2014 .

[100]  Vincent Myers,et al.  Coherence estimation for repeat-pass interferometry , 2014, 2014 Oceans - St. John's.

[101]  Lucía Díaz-Vilariño,et al.  Lidar-equipped uav for building information modelling , 2014 .

[102]  Tomasz Templin,et al.  Application of Integrated GNSS/Hydroacoustic Measurements and GIS Geodatabase Models for Bottom Analysis of Lake Hancza: the Deepest Inland Reservoir in Poland , 2014, Pure and Applied Geophysics.

[103]  Walyeldeen Godah EVALUATION OF RECENT GOCE GEOPOTENTIAL MODELS OVER THE AREA OF POLAND , 2013 .

[104]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  The quality of big (geo)data , 2013 .

[105]  Ari Huusko,et al.  Assessing Habitat Suitability for Juvenile Atlantic Salmon in Relation to In‐Stream Restoration and Discharge Variability , 2013 .

[106]  F. Fava,et al.  DEM extraction from archive aerial photos: accuracy assessment in areas of complex topography , 2013 .

[107]  D. U. Sanli,et al.  ON THE PERFORMANCE OF GNSS LEVELLING OVER STEEP SLOPES , 2012 .

[108]  J. Ihde,et al.  Unification of European height system realizations , 2012 .

[109]  A. Łyszkowicz,et al.  STATUS AND STATISTICAL PROPERTIES OF THE PRECISE LEVELLING NETWORKS IN POLAND , 2012 .

[110]  M. Goodchild,et al.  Researching Volunteered Geographic Information: Spatial Data, Geographic Research, and New Social Practice , 2012 .

[111]  N. K. Pavlis,et al.  The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008) , 2012 .

[112]  Russ Burtner,et al.  INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH GEOGRAPHICS REVIEW Open Access , 2022 .

[113]  Maarten G. Kleinhans,et al.  Philosophy of Earth Science , 2010 .

[114]  T. Cole,et al.  Geographies Of The Holocaust , 2009, A Companion to the Holocaust.

[115]  S. Ses,et al.  The Second Precise Levelling Network of Peninsular Malaysia , 2009 .

[116]  W. Reid,et al.  Earth System Research Priorities , 2009, Science.

[117]  Jean Chery,et al.  Monitoring of the large slow Kahrod landslide in Alborz mountain range (Iran) by GPS and SAR interferometry , 2008 .

[118]  E. Chapin,et al.  Along-track interferometry for ground moving target indication , 2008, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine.

[119]  P. Clarke GPS Satellite Surveying , 2007 .

[120]  Manfred Zink,et al.  Interferometric alignment of the X-SAR antenna system on the space shuttle radar topography mission , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[121]  K. Richards,et al.  Developments in monitoring and modelling small‐scale river bed topography , 1994 .

[122]  C. Werner,et al.  Satellite radar interferometry: Two-dimensional phase unwrapping , 1988 .

[123]  Bruce MacVicar,et al.  Stream power index for networks (SPIN) toolbox for decision support in urbanizing watersheds , 2021, Environ. Model. Softw..

[124]  L. Taha,et al.  Assessment of Approaches for the Extraction of Building Footprints from Pléiades Images , 2021, Geomatics and Environmental Engineering.

[125]  A. Kopec,et al.  LONG-TERM MONITORING OF THE IMPACT OF MINING OPERATIONS ON THE GROUND SURFACE AT THE REGIONAL SCALE BASED ON THE INSAR-SBAS TECHNIQUE, THE UPPER SILESIAN COAL BASIN (POLAND). CASE STUDY , 2021 .

[126]  C. Okolie,et al.  AN ASSESSMENT OF THE ACCURACY OF STRUCTURE-FROM-MOTION (SFM) PHOTOGRAMMETRY FOR 3D TERRAIN MAPPING , 2020, Geomatics, Landmanagement and Landscape.

[127]  Nicola Casagli,et al.  Integration of GNSS and Satellite InSAR Data: Derivation of Fine-Scale Vertical Surface Motion Maps of Po Plain, Northern Apennines, and Southern Alps, Italy , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[128]  P. Wielgosz,et al.  Research on GNSS positioning and applications in Poland in 2015–2018 , 2019 .

[129]  R. Kadaj Transformations between the height reference frames: Kronsztadt'60, PL-KRON86-NH, PL-EVRF2007-NH , 2018 .

[130]  Kamil Maciuk,et al.  Different approaches in GLONASS orbit computation from broadcast ephemeris , 2016 .

[131]  A. Darzi,et al.  Smartphones let surgeons know WhatsApp: an analysis of communication in emergency surgical teams. , 2015, American Journal of Surgery.

[132]  James Norris,et al.  Future trends in geospatial information management: the five to ten year vision , 2015 .

[133]  Pradip M. Jawandhiya,et al.  Review of Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) , 2013 .

[134]  Qin Zhang,et al.  Real-time clock offset prediction with an improved model , 2013, GPS Solutions.

[135]  J. Rapiński,et al.  Adjustment of vertical crustal movement network on the basis of last three leveling campaigns in Poland , 2012 .

[136]  N. K. Pavlis,et al.  The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 ( EGM 2008 ) , 2012 .

[137]  Mehdi Eshagh,et al.  PERTURBATIONS IN ORBITAL ELEMENTS OF A LOW EARTH ORBITING SATELLITE , 2007 .

[138]  I. Gajderowicz Ocena dokładności krajowej sieci niwelacji precyzyjnej I klasy pomierzonej w latach 1997-2003 , 2005 .

[139]  A. S. Walker,et al.  The International Archives of the Photogrammetry , Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences , 2004 .

[140]  N. Rožić Fundamental levelling networks and height datums at the territory of the Republic of Croatia , 2001 .

[141]  E. Lambin Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems Analysis , 2001 .

[142]  Iho IHO STANDARDS FOR HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEYS , 1998 .

[143]  R. Congalton Exploring and Evaluating the Consequences of Vector-to-Raster and Raster-to-Vector Conversion , 1997 .