Effects of display size and navigation type on a classification task

The advent of ultra-high resolution wall-size displays and their use for complex tasks require a more systematic analysis and deeper understanding of their advantages and drawbacks compared with desktop monitors. While previous work has mostly addressed search, visualization and sense-making tasks, we have designed an abstract classification task that involves explicit data manipulation. Based on our observations of real uses of a wall display, this task represents a large category of applications. We report on a controlled experiment that uses this task to compare physical navigation in front of a wall-size display with virtual navigation using pan-and-zoom on the desktop. Our main finding is a robust interaction effect between display type and task difficulty: while the desktop can be faster than the wall for simple tasks, the wall gains a sizable advantage as the task becomes more difficult. A follow-up study shows that other desktop techniques (overview+detail, lens) do not perform better than pan-and-zoom and are therefore slower than the wall for difficult tasks.

[1]  Lydia B. Chilton,et al.  Cobi: a community-informed conference scheduling tool , 2013, UIST.

[2]  Olivier Chapuis,et al.  JellyLens: content-aware adaptive lenses , 2012, UIST.

[3]  Olivier Chapuis,et al.  Mid-air pan-and-zoom on wall-sized displays , 2011, CHI.

[4]  Catherine Plaisant,et al.  Navigation patterns and usability of zoomable user interfaces with and without an overview , 2002, TCHI.

[5]  Emmanuel Pietriga,et al.  High-precision pointing on large wall displays using small handheld devices , 2013, CHI.

[6]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  A review of overview+detail, zooming, and focus+context interfaces , 2009, CSUR.

[7]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Toward Characterizing the Productivity Benefits of Very Large Displays , 2003, INTERACT.

[8]  Olivier Chapuis,et al.  Multisurface Interaction in the WILD Room , 2012, Computer.

[9]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Women take a wider view , 2002, CHI.

[10]  Xiaojun Bi,et al.  Comparing usage of a large high-resolution display to single or dual desktop displays for daily work , 2009, CHI.

[11]  Manojit Sarkar,et al.  Graphical fisheye views of graphs , 1992, CHI.

[12]  Chris North,et al.  POWERWALL: int. workshop on interactive, ultra-high-resolution displays , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[13]  Chris North,et al.  Beyond visual acuity: the perceptual scalability of information visualizations for large displays , 2007, CHI.

[14]  Anastasia Bezerianos,et al.  Perception of Visual Variables on Tiled Wall-Sized Displays for Information Visualization Applications , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[15]  Christopher Andrews,et al.  Visual encodings that support physical navigation on large displays , 2011, Graphics Interface.

[16]  Chris North,et al.  The effects of peripheral vision and physical navigation on large scale visualization , 2008, Graphics Interface.

[17]  Tamara Munzner,et al.  An evaluation of pan & zoom and rubber sheet navigation with and without an overview , 2006, CHI.

[18]  qcMIZCV QoKNQ,et al.  Increased Display Size and Resolution Improve Task Performance in Information-Rich Virtual Environments , 2006 .

[19]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Physically large displays improve performance on spatial tasks , 2006, TCHI.

[20]  Chris North,et al.  Move to improve: promoting physical navigation to increase user performance with large displays , 2007, CHI.

[21]  Emmanuel Pietriga,et al.  Pointing and beyond: an operationalization and preliminary evaluation of multi-scale searching , 2007, CHI.

[22]  Christopher Andrews,et al.  Space to think: large high-resolution displays for sensemaking , 2010, CHI.

[23]  Emmanuel Pietriga,et al.  Rapid development of user interfaces on cluster-driven wall displays with jBricks , 2011, EICS '11.

[24]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  View size and pointing difficulty in multi-scale navigation , 2004, AVI.

[25]  Mikkel Rønne Jakobsen,et al.  Sizing up visualizations: effects of display size in focus+context, overview+detail, and zooming interfaces , 2011, CHI.

[26]  R. Bakeman Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs , 2005, Behavior research methods.