Multisensory identification of natural objects in a two-way crossmodal priming paradigm.

The question of how vision and audition interact in natural object identification is currently a matter of debate. We developed a large set of auditory and visual stimuli representing natural objects in order to facilitate research in the field of multisensory processing. Normative data was obtained for 270 brief environmental sounds and 320 visual object stimuli. Each stimulus was named, categorized, and rated with regard to familiarity and emotional valence by N=56 participants (Study 1). This multimodal stimulus set was employed in two subsequent crossmodal priming experiments that used semantically congruent and incongruent stimulus pairs in a S1-S2 paradigm. Task-relevant targets were either auditory (Study 2) or visual stimuli (Study 3). The behavioral data of both experiments expressed a crossmodal priming effect with shorter reaction times for congruent as compared to incongruent stimulus pairs. The observed facilitation effect suggests that object identification in one modality is influenced by input from another modality. This result implicates that congruent visual and auditory stimulus pairs were perceived as the same object and demonstrates a first validation of the multimodal stimulus set.

[1]  W. Singer,et al.  Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Multisensory contributions to low-level, ‘unisensory’ processing , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[3]  M. Bradley,et al.  Emotion, Motivation, and Anxiety: Brain Mechanisms and Psychophysiology the Motivational Organization of Emotion Patterns of Human Emotion Emotion and Perception the Psychophysiology of Picture Processing Neural Imaging: Motivation in the Visual Cortex Motivational Circuits in the Brain , 2022 .

[4]  C. Spence,et al.  The Handbook of Multisensory Processing , 2004 .

[5]  Denis Fize,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[6]  Randolph D. Easton,et al.  Visual–Auditory Events: Cross-Modal Perceptual Priming and Recognition Memory , 2001, Consciousness and Cognition.

[7]  S. Debener,et al.  Late auditory evoked potentials asymmetry revisited , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  G. Calvert Crossmodal processing in the human brain: insights from functional neuroimaging studies. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  A. Engel,et al.  Auditory novelty oddball allows reliable distinction of top-down and bottom-up processes of attention. , 2002, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[10]  A. Engel,et al.  What is novel in the novelty oddball paradigm? Functional significance of the novelty P3 event-related potential as revealed by independent component analysis. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[11]  D. H. Warren,et al.  Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. , 1980, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  F. Dick,et al.  An on-line task for contrasting auditory processing in the verbal and nonverbal domains and norms for younger and older adults , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[13]  An online task for contrasting auditory processing in the verbal and nonverbal domains and norms for younger and older adults , 2004 .

[14]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[15]  M. Giard,et al.  Auditory-Visual Integration during Multimodal Object Recognition in Humans: A Behavioral and Electrophysiological Study , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  Stefan Debener,et al.  Size matters: effects of stimulus size, duration and eccentricity on the visual gamma-band response , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  R. Henson Neuroimaging studies of priming , 2003, Progress in Neurobiology.

[18]  E Tulving,et al.  Priming and human memory systems. , 1990, Science.

[19]  M. Fabiani,et al.  Naming norms for brief environmental sounds: effects of age and dementia. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[20]  Fiona N. Newell,et al.  Visual, haptic and cross-modal recognition of objects and scenes , 2004, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[21]  R. D. Easton,et al.  Transfer between vision and haptics: Memory for 2-D patterns and 3-D objects , 1997 .

[22]  Daniel Gembris,et al.  Top-down attentional processing enhances auditory evoked gamma band activity , 2003, Neuroreport.

[23]  J. Ballas Common factors in the identification of an assortment of brief everyday sounds. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  From auditory image to auditory percept: Facilitation through common processes? , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[25]  Daniel Senkowski,et al.  Multisensory processing and oscillatory gamma responses: effects of spatial selective attention , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  G. Calvert,et al.  Multisensory integration: methodological approaches and emerging principles in the human brain , 2004, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[27]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[28]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Multisensory Convergence in Early Cortical Processing. , 2004 .

[29]  Brian Gygi,et al.  How to select stimuli for environmental sound research and where to find them , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[30]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Auditory temporal processes in normal-hearing individuals and in patients with auditory neuropathy , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[31]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Memory and cognition , 1977 .

[32]  B. Argall,et al.  Integration of Auditory and Visual Information about Objects in Superior Temporal Sulcus , 2004, Neuron.

[33]  A. McClelland,et al.  An Investigation of Cross-Modality Effects in Implicit and Explicit Memory , 1991 .

[34]  T. Stoffregen,et al.  On specification and the senses , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[35]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Multisensory visual-auditory object recognition in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Priming the Identification of Environmental Sounds , 1995, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[37]  Sidney S. Simon,et al.  Merging of the Senses , 2008, Front. Neurosci..

[38]  David Friedman,et al.  Stimulus characteristics and task category dissociate the anterior and posterior aspects of the novelty P3. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[39]  A. Amedi,et al.  Functional imaging of human crossmodal identification and object recognition , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  B. Rossion,et al.  Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's Object Pictorial Set: The Role of Surface Detail in Basic-Level Object Recognition , 2004, Perception.

[41]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .