Blinking During and After Lying

We tested the hypothesis derived from eye blink literature that when liars experience cognitive demand, their lies would be associated with a decrease in eye blinks, directly followed by an increase in eye blinks when the demand has ceased after the lie is told. A total of 13 liars and 13 truth tellers lied or told the truth in a target period; liars and truth tellers both told the truth in two baseline periods. Their eye blinks during the target and baseline periods and directly after the target period (target offset period) were recorded. The predicted pattern (compared to the baseline periods, a decrease in eye blinks during the target period and an increase in eye blinks during the target offset period) was found in liars and was strikingly different from the pattern obtained in truth tellers. They showed an increase in eye blinks during the target period compared to the baseline periods, whereas their pattern of eye blinks in the target offset period did not differ from baseline periods. The implications for lie detection are discussed.

[1]  G. C. Drew,et al.  Variations in Reflex Blink-Rate during Visual-Motor Tasks , 1951 .

[2]  M. Holland,et al.  Blinking and Mental Load , 1972, Psychological reports.

[3]  M. Holland,et al.  Blinking and Thinking , 1975, Perceptual and motor skills.

[4]  Robert J. Weber,et al.  Effects of illumination and meter on spontaneous eyeblinks , 1977 .

[5]  L. Manelis,et al.  Effect of Awareness on an Indicator of Cognitive Load , 1979 .

[6]  M. Zuckerman Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception , 1981 .

[7]  J. Stern,et al.  The endogenous eyeblink. , 1984, Psychophysiology.

[8]  Analysis of controlling facial expression when experiencing negative affect on an anatomical basis. , 1985 .

[9]  R Goldstein,et al.  Effects of Information-Processing Demands on Physiological Response Patterns , 1987, Human factors.

[10]  B. Depaulo,et al.  The Motivational Impairment Effect in the Communication of Deception , 1989 .

[11]  K. Scherer,et al.  Stress specificities: differential effects of coping style, gender, and type of stressor on autonomic arousal, facial expression, and subjective feeling. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  D. Gilbert How mental systems believe. , 1991 .

[13]  R Goldstein,et al.  Effect of task difficulty and interstimulus interval on blink parameters. , 1992, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[14]  J. Harrigan,et al.  How do you look when feeling anxious? Facial displays of anxiety , 1996 .

[15]  Gün R. Semin,et al.  Insight into behavior displayed during deception , 1996 .

[16]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Interpersonal Deception Theory , 1996 .

[17]  Adaptation and communicative design: Patterns of interaction in deceptive and truthful interchanges. , 1996 .

[18]  Aldert Vrij,et al.  Individual Differences in Hand Movements During Deception , 1997 .

[19]  T. Gilovich,et al.  The illusion of transparency: biased assessments of others' ability to read one's emotional states. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Ray Bull,et al.  Stereotypical Verbal and Nonverbal Responses While Deceiving Others , 2001 .

[21]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Adaptation and Communicative Design Patterns of Interaction in Truthful and Deceptive Conversations , 2001 .

[22]  I. Wilkinson,et al.  Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans , 2001, Neuroreport.

[23]  Leif A. Strömwall,et al.  Repeated interrogations: verbal and non‐verbal cues to deception , 2002 .

[24]  Ray Bull,et al.  Suspects, Lies, and Videotape: An Analysis of Authentic High-Stake Liars , 2002, Law and human behavior.

[25]  A. Vrij Telling and detecting lies , 2002 .

[26]  Rachel Croson,et al.  SEEING AND BELIEVING: VISUAL ACCESS AND THE STRATEGIC USE OF DECEPTION , 2002 .

[27]  James J. Lindsay,et al.  Cues to deception. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  Eric Seemann,et al.  Cognitive mechanisms underlying lying to questions: response time as a cue to deception , 2003 .

[29]  G. Gudjonsson,et al.  The Psychology of Confessions , 2004, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[30]  S. Kassin,et al.  Why People Waive Their Miranda Rights: The Power of Innocence , 2004, Law and human behavior.

[31]  T. Farrow,et al.  A cognitive neurobiological account of deception: evidence from functional neuroimaging. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[32]  Aldert Vrij,et al.  Why professionals fail to catch liars and how they can improve , 2004 .

[33]  Maria Hartwig,et al.  The Detection of Deception in Forensic Contexts: Practitioners' beliefs about deception , 2004 .

[34]  S. Kassin,et al.  On the psychology of confessions: does innocence put innocents at risk? , 2005, The American psychologist.

[35]  Augusto Gnisci,et al.  Processes underlying deception: an empirical analysis of truth and lies when manipulating the stakes , 2005 .

[36]  Jeffrey J. Walczyk,et al.  LYING PERSON‐TO‐PERSON ABOUT LIFE EVENTS: A COGNITIVE FRAMEWORK FOR LIE DETECTION , 2005 .

[37]  P. Granhag,et al.  Strategic use of evidence during police interrogations: When training to detect deception works , 2005 .

[38]  Maria Hartwig,et al.  Strategic Use of Evidence During Police Interviews: When Training to Detect Deception Works , 2006, Law and human behavior.

[39]  S Leal Central and peripheral physiology of attention and cognitive demand : understanding how brain and body work together. , 2006 .

[40]  Maria Hartwig,et al.  To act truthfully: Nonverbal behaviour and strategies during a police interrogation , 2006 .

[41]  Aldert Vrij,et al.  Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  Aldert Vrij,et al.  Information-gathering vs accusatory interview style: Individual differences in respondents’ experiences , 2006 .

[43]  Aldert Vrij,et al.  Criteria-Based Content Analysis: An empirical test of its underlying processes , 2006 .

[44]  Aldert Vrij,et al.  Police officers’ judgements of veracity, tenseness, cognitive load and attempted behavioural control in real-life police interviews , 2006 .

[45]  A. Vrij,et al.  Police officers', social workers', teachers' and the general public's beliefs about deception in children, adolescents and adults. , 2006 .

[46]  Rachel Taylor,et al.  Believed cues to deception: Judgments in self‐generated trivial and serious situations , 2007 .

[47]  Ray Bull,et al.  Increasing Cognitive Load to Facilitate Lie Detection: The Benefit of Recalling an Event in Reverse Order , 2008, Law and human behavior.

[48]  A. Vrij Detecting Lies and Deceit: Pitfalls and Opportunities , 2008 .

[49]  T. Williamson,et al.  International Developments in Investigative Interviewing , 2009 .

[50]  Increasing cognitive load in interviews to detect deceit , 2009 .

[51]  Charles R. Honts Deception: Detection of , 2009 .