Spinning slithole collimation for high-sensitivity small animal SPECT: Design and assessment using GATE simulation.

PURPOSE While traditional collimations are widely used in preclinical SPECT imaging, they usually suffer from possessing a low system sensitivity leading to noisy images. In this study, we are aiming at introducing a novel collimator, the slithole, offering a superior resolution-sensitivity tradeoff for small animal SPECT. METHODS The collimator was designed for a molecular SPECT scanner, the HiReSPECT. The slithole is a knife-edge narrow long aperture extended across long-axis of the camera's head. To meet the data completeness requirement, the collimator-detector assembly spins at each regular SPECT angle. The collimator was modeled within GATE Monte Carlo simulator and the data acquisition was performed for NEMA Image Quality (IQ) phantom. In addition, a dedicated 3D iterative reconstruction algorithm based upon plane-integral projections was also developed. RESULTS The mean sensitivity of the slithole is 285cps/MBq while the current parallel-hole collimator holds a sensitivity of 36cps/MBq at a 30mm distance. The slithole collimation gives rise to a tomographic resolution of 1.8mm compared to a spatial resolution of∼1.7mm for the parallel-hole one (even after resolution modeling). A 1.75 reduction factor in the noise level was observed when the current parallel-hole collimator is replaced by the slithole. Furthermore, quantitative analysis proves that 3 full-iterations of our dedicated image reconstruction lead to optimal image quality. For the largest rod in the NEMA IQ phantom, a recovery coefficient of∼0.83 was obtained. CONCLUSION The slithole collimator outperforms the current parallel-hole collimation by exhibiting a better resolution-sensitivity compromise for preclinical SPECT studies.

[1]  Harrison H. Barrett,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction from planar projections , 1980 .

[2]  Mohammad Reza Ay,et al.  Collimator-detector response compensation in molecular SPECT reconstruction using STIR framework , 2017 .

[3]  Mohammad Reza Ay,et al.  How Gamma Camera's Head-Tilts Affect Image Quality of a Nuclear Scintigram? , 2014 .

[4]  Bin He,et al.  Low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography in a realistic geometry head model: a simulation study , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  A. Rahmim,et al.  Resolution-recovery-embedded image reconstruction for a high-resolution animal SPECT system. , 2014, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[6]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Molecular Imaging of Small Animals , 2014, Springer New York.

[7]  G. Zeng,et al.  Design considerations for a new solid-state gamma-camera: Soltice , 2001, 2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310).

[8]  L T Fitzgerald,et al.  A computerized rotating laminar radionuclide camera. , 1979, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  S. Meikle,et al.  Small animal SPECT and its place in the matrix of molecular imaging technologies , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  M. Ay,et al.  Performance evaluation of a newly developed high‐resolution, dual‐head animal SPECT system based on the NEMA NU1–2007 standard , 2014, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[11]  R. Jaszczak,et al.  Improved SPECT quantification using compensation for scattered photons. , 1984, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Recent developments and future trends in nuclear medicine instrumentation. , 2006, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[13]  G. Santin,et al.  GATE: a Geant4-based simulation platform for PET and SPECT integrating movement and time management , 2003 .

[14]  Arman Rahmim,et al.  Design and development of a high resolution animal SPECT scanner dedicated for rat and mouse imaging , 2014 .

[15]  Roel Van Holen,et al.  Tomographic image quality of rotating slat versus parallel hole-collimated SPECT , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  F Boisson,et al.  Characterization of a rotating slat collimator system dedicated to small animal imaging , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Mohammad Reza Ay,et al.  Monte Carlo Optimization of Crystal Configuration for Pixelated Molecular SPECT Scanners , 2017 .

[18]  S. Webb,et al.  Monte Carlo modelling of the performance of a rotating slit-collimator for improved planar gamma-camera imaging. , 1992, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  F Boisson,et al.  Assessment of a fast generated analytical matrix for rotating slat collimation iterative reconstruction: a possible method to optimize the collimation profile , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  C. Vanhove,et al.  Review of SPECT collimator selection, optimization, and fabrication for clinical and preclinical imaging. , 2015, Medical physics.

[21]  Matthew A. Kupinski,et al.  Small-Animal Spect Imaging , 2005 .

[22]  G. Loudos,et al.  GATE simulations for small animal SPECT/PET using voxelized phantoms and rotating-head detectors , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[23]  Steve Webb,et al.  A prototype rotating slat collimator for single photon emission computed tomography , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[24]  Ignace Lemahieu,et al.  Comparing planar image quality of rotating slat and parallel hole collimation: influence of system modeling. , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  Mark T Madsen,et al.  Recent Advances in SPECT Imaging , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  S Stute,et al.  GATE V6: a major enhancement of the GATE simulation platform enabling modelling of CT and radiotherapy , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  Ciprian Catana,et al.  Small-Animal Molecular Imaging Methods , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[28]  Navid Zeraatkar,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of the Performance of HiReSPECT Scanner: a High-Resolution SPECT System for Small Animal Imaging , 2015 .

[29]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Quantitative Analysis in Nuclear Medicine Imaging , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[30]  S. Webb,et al.  Geometric efficiency of a rotating slit-collimator for improved planar gamma-camera imaging , 1993 .

[31]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  Mohammad Reza Ay,et al.  Comparative Assessment of Rotating Slat and Parallel Hole Collimator Performance in GE DST-Xli Gamma Camera: A Monte Carlo Study , 2009 .

[33]  R. G. Simpson,et al.  Imaging with rotating slit apertures and rotating collimators. , 1982, Medical physics.

[34]  D. Gagnon,et al.  CdZnTe strip detector SPECT imaging with a slit collimator. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  S. Webb,et al.  The experimental evaluation of a prototype rotating slat collimator for planar gamma camera imaging. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  PET versus SPECT: strengths, limitations and challenges , 2008, Nuclear medicine communications.