Online Display Advertising: Modeling the Effects of Multiple Creatives and Individual Impression Histories

Online advertising campaigns often consist of multiple ads, each with different creative content. We consider how various creatives in a campaign differentially affect behavior given the targeted individual's ad impression history, as characterized by the timing and mix of previously seen ad creatives. Specifically, we examine the impact that each ad impression has on visiting and conversion behavior at the advertised brand's website. We accommodate both observed and unobserved individual heterogeneity and take into account correlations among the rates of ad impressions, website visits, and conversions. We also allow for the accumulation and decay of advertising effects, as well as ad wearout and restoration effects. Our results highlight the importance of accommodating both the existence of multiple ad creatives in an ad campaign and the impact of an individual's ad impression history. Simulation results suggest that online advertisers can increase the number of website visits and conversions by varying the creative content shown to an individual according to that person's history of previous ad impressions. For our data, we show a 12.7% increase in the expected number of visits and a 13.8% increase in the expected number of conversions.

[1]  R. Winkelmann.  Econometric Analysis of Count Data , 1997 .

[2]  A. Brix.  Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd edn , 2005 .

[3]  John D. C. Little,et al.  Feature Article - Aggregate Advertising Models: The State of the Art , 1979, Oper. Res..

[4]  G. Tellis,et al.  Generalizations about Advertising Effectiveness in Markets , 2009, Journal of Advertising Research.

[5]  X. Drèze,et al.  Internet advertising: Is anybody watching? , 2003 .

[6]  Pradeep K. Chintagunta,et al.  The Effect of Banner Advertising on Internet Purchasing , 2006 .

[7]  David C. Schmittlein,et al.  Predicting Future Random Events Based on Past Performance , 1981 .

[8]  Kevin D. Glazebrook,et al.  Multi-Armed Bandit Allocation Indices: Gittins/Multi-Armed Bandit Allocation Indices , 2011 .

[9]  Puneet Manchanda,et al.  An Empirical Model of Advertising Dynamics , 2004 .

[10]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Advertising Pulsing Policies for Generating Awareness for New Products , 1986 .

[11]  K. Arrow,et al.  OPTIMAL ADVERTISING POLICY UNDER DYNAMIC CONDITIONS , 1962 .

[12]  Fred M. Feinberg,et al.  The Shape of Advertising Response Functions Revisited: A Model of Dynamic Probabilistic Thresholds , 2004 .

[13]  Prasad A. Naik,et al.  Planning Media Schedules in the Presence of Dynamic Advertising Quality , 1998 .

[14]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Leveraging Missing Ratings to Improve Online Recommendation Systems , 2006 .

[15]  P. Chatterjee,et al.  Modeling the Clickstream: Implications for Web-Based Advertising Efforts , 2003 .

[16]  Leonard M. Lodish,et al.  A Summary of Fifty-Five In-Market Experimental Estimates of the Long-Term Effect of TV Advertising , 1995 .

[17]  Oliver J. Rutz,et al.  From Generic to Branded: A Model of Spillover in Paid Search Advertising , 2011 .

[18]  J. Bather,et al.  Multi‐Armed Bandit Allocation Indices , 1990 .

[19]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[20]  D. Stewart,et al.  Advertising Repetition: A Critical Review of Wearin and Wearout , 1988, Current Issues and Research in Advertising.

[21]  David A. Schweidel,et al.  Online Product Opinions: Incidence, Evaluation, and Evolution , 2012, Mark. Sci..

[22]  Fred M. Feinberg,et al.  Pulsing Policies for Aggregate Advertising Models , 1992 .

[23]  Fred M. Feinberg,et al.  On Continuous-Time Optimal Advertising Under S-Shaped Response , 2001, Manag. Sci..