Evaluation of similarity measures for reconstruction-based registration in image-guided radiotherapy and surgery.

PURPOSE A promising patient positioning technique is based on registering computed tomographic (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) images to cone-beam CT images (CBCT). The extra radiation dose delivered to the patient can be substantially reduced by using fewer projections. This approach results in lower quality CBCT images. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a number of similarity measures (SMs) suitable for registration of CT or MR images to low-quality CBCTs. METHODS AND MATERIALS Using the recently proposed evaluation protocol, we evaluated nine SMs with respect to pretreatment imaging modalities, number of two-dimensional (2D) images used for reconstruction, and number of reconstruction iterations. The image database consisted of 100 X-ray and corresponding CT and MR images of two vertebral columns. RESULTS Using a higher number of 2D projections or reconstruction iterations results in higher accuracy and slightly lower robustness. The similarity measures that behaved the best also yielded the best registration results. The most appropriate similarity measure was the asymmetric multi-feature mutual information (AMMI). CONCLUSIONS The evaluation protocol proved to be a valuable tool for selecting the best similarity measure for the reconstruction-based registration. The results indicate that accurate and robust CT/CBCT or even MR/CBCT registrations are possible if the AMMI similarity measure is used.

[1]  A. Kak,et al.  Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Technique (SART): A Superior Implementation of the Art Algorithm , 1984, Ultrasonic imaging.

[2]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  A protocol for evaluation of similarity measures for rigid registration , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Automated multi-modality image registration based on information theory , 1995 .

[4]  D. R. Fish,et al.  A patient-to-computed-tomography image registration method based on digitally reconstructed radiographs. , 1994, Medical physics.

[5]  C C Ling,et al.  Cone-beam CT with megavoltage beams and an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device: potential for verification of radiotherapy of lung cancer. , 2002, Medical physics.

[6]  Steve Webb,et al.  Radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging alone. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  D A Jaffray,et al.  A radiographic and tomographic imaging system integrated into a medical linear accelerator for localization of bone and soft-tissue targets. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  3-D/2-D registration by integrating 2-D information in 3-D , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Jürgen Weese,et al.  A comparison of similarity measures for use in 2-D-3-D medical image registration , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  A performance comparison of flat-panel imager-based MV and kV cone-beam CT. , 2002, Medical physics.

[11]  E Klotz,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of high contrast objects using C-arm image intensifier projection data. , 1999, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[12]  M. Oldham,et al.  Cone-beam-CT guided radiation therapy: technical implementation. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  Graeme P. Penney,et al.  Standardized evaluation methodology for 2-D-3-D registration , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  C. Ramsey,et al.  Clinical application of digitally-reconstructed radiographs generated from magnetic resonance imaging for intracranial lesions. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Ping Xia,et al.  Low-dose megavoltage cone-beam CT for radiation therapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  M. Goitein,et al.  Multi-dimensional treatment planning: II. Beam's eye-view, back projection, and projection through CT sections. , 1983, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  J. Wong,et al.  Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  T. Peters.  Image-guided surgery: From X-rays to Virtual Reality , 2001, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[19]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  MRI‐PET Registration with Automated Algorithm , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[20]  J. Fowler,et al.  Image guidance for precise conformal radiotherapy. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  Joachim Denzler,et al.  Progressive attenuation fields: Fast 2D‐3D image registration without precomputation , 2005 .

[22]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Automated multi-moda lity image registration based on information theory , 1995 .

[23]  Jürgen Weese,et al.  Voxel-based 2-D/3-D registration of fluoroscopy images and CT scans for image-guided surgery , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[24]  G W Sherouse,et al.  Computation of digitally reconstructed radiographs for use in radiotherapy treatment design. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  The Correlation Ratio as a New Similarity Measure for Multimodal Image Registration , 1998, MICCAI.

[26]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  M van Herk,et al.  Automatic three-dimensional inspection of patient setup in radiation therapy using portal images, simulator images, and computed tomography data. , 1996, Medical physics.

[28]  Gregory C Sharp,et al.  Integrated radiotherapy imaging system (IRIS): design considerations of tumour tracking with linac gantry-mounted diagnostic x-ray systems with flat-panel detectors , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  Tomaz Slivnik,et al.  3-D/2-D registration of CT and MR to X-ray images , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  R. Kikinis,et al.  Image-guided surgery. , 1999 .

[31]  David A Jaffray,et al.  Emergent technologies for 3-dimensional image-guided radiation delivery. , 2005, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[32]  B G Fallone,et al.  Three-dimensional anatomy setup verification by correlation of orthogonal portal images and digitally reconstructed radiographs. , 1999, Medical physics.

[33]  Colin Studholme,et al.  An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[34]  J Dudson,et al.  A feasibility study for megavoltage cone beam CT using a commercial EPID. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  B. Wilson,et al.  Volume CT with a flat-panel detector on a mobile, isocentric C-arm: pre-clinical investigation in guidance of minimally invasive surgery. , 2005, Medical physics.

[36]  A W Beavis,et al.  Radiotherapy treatment planning of brain tumours using MRI alone. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[37]  Alan Pollack,et al.  MRI-based treatment planning for radiotherapy: dosimetric verification for prostate IMRT. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[38]  G. Marchal,et al.  Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997 .

[39]  Serge Miguet,et al.  Patient setup error measurement using 3D intensity-based image registration techniques. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[40]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  A Protocol for Optimization-Independent Similarity Measure Evaluation , 2003, WBIR.