How can the UK statutory Cryptosporidium monitoring be used for Quantitative Risk Assessment of Cryptosporidium in drinking water?

Quantitative Microbiological Risk Assessment (QMRA) is increasingly being used to complement traditional verification of drinking water safety through the absence of indicator bacteria. However, the full benefit of QMRA is often not achieved because of a lack of appropriate data on the fate and behaviour of pathogens. In the UK, statutory monitoring for Cryptosporidium has provided a unique dataset of pathogens directly measured in large volumes of treated drinking water. Using this data a QMRA was performed to determine the benefits and limitations of such state-of-the-art monitoring for risk assessment. Estimates of the risk of infection at the 216 assessed treatment sites ranged from 10(-6.5) to 10(-2.5) person(-1) d(-1). In addition, Cryptosporidium monitoring data in source water was collected at eight treatment sites to determine how Cryptosporidium removal could be quantified for QMRA purposes. Cryptosporidium removal varied from 1.8 to 5.2 log units and appeared to be related to source water Cryptosporidium concentration. Application of general removal credits can either over- or underestimate Cryptosporidium removal by full-scale sedimentation and filtration. State-of-the-art pathogen monitoring can identify poorly performing systems, although it is ineffective to verify drinking water safety to the level of 10(-4) infections person(-1) yr(-1).

[1]  Charles P. Gerba,et al.  Modeling the Risk from Giardia and Viruses in Drinking Water , 1991 .

[2]  E. C. Nieminski,et al.  Comparison of two methods for detection of Giardia cysts and Cryptosporidium oocysts in water , 1995, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[3]  Arie H. Havelaar,et al.  Assessment of the risk of infection by Cryptosporidium or Giardia in drinking water from a surface water source , 1997 .

[4]  C. J. Gibson,et al.  Risk assessment of waterborne protozoa: current status and future trends , 1999, Parasitology.

[5]  J. Rose,et al.  Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment , 1999 .

[6]  Kim R. Fox,et al.  Controlling Cryptosporidium oocysts Using Conventional Treatment , 2001 .

[7]  P. Teunis,et al.  Cryptosporidium Dose Response Studies: Variation Between Isolates , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[8]  J. Bates,et al.  Evaluation of Five Membrane Filtration Methods for Recovery of Cryptosporidium and Giardia Isolates from Water Samples , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[9]  Mark W. LeChevallier,et al.  Detection of Infectious Cryptosporidium in Filtered Drinking Water , 2004 .

[10]  Katrina J. Charles,et al.  Transport of MS2 Phage, Escherichia coli, Clostridium perfringens, Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia intestinalis in a Gravel and a Sandy Soil • , 2005 .

[11]  Karin Bosklopper,et al.  Assessment of the capacity of slow sand filtration to eliminate Cryptosporidium oocysts , 2006 .

[12]  F Dangendorf,et al.  Estimation of the consumption of cold tap water for microbiological risk assessment: an overview of studies and statistical analysis of data. , 2007, Journal of water and health.