Assessing the occurrence of eleborative inference with recognition: Compatibility checking vs compound cue theory

Abstract In previous research, we have used delayed item recognition to investigate the information about elaborative inferences that is generated during reading. Recently, Potts, Keenan, and Golding suggested that results from recognition experiments are not determined by information encoded during reading, but rather by information calculated at the time of the recognition test. They proposed that test items that represent potential inferences from studied sentences are compared to the sentences at the time of the recognition test, and performance on recognition is a function of the compatibility of the test items with the sentences in memory. In this article, we present both theoretical and experimental results that argue against this compatibility-checking hypothesis. In Experiment 1, on-line lexical decision is used to demonstrate that relations between sentences and test items that affect on-line performance do not affect performance in delayed recognition, as they should according to the compatibility hypothesis. In Experiment 2, it is shown that subjects' ratings of compatibility do not predict recognition performance. It is concluded on the basis of the experimental results that the compatibility hypothesis does not account for delayed recognition performance. In addition, a review of theories of recognition memory shows that the compatibility hypothesis is not consistent with the temporal dynamics of processes in these theories.

[1]  H. C. Stevens,et al.  The retina and righthandedness. , 1912 .

[2]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Time course of item and associative information: implications for global memory models. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Inferences about contextually defined categories. , 1989 .

[4]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[5]  John R. Anderson.  The Architecture of Cognition , 1983 .

[6]  B. Dosher.  Discriminating preexperimental (semantic) from learned (episodic) associations: A speed-accuracy study , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Continuous versus discrete information processing modeling accumulation of partial information. , 1988, Psychological review.

[8]  G. R. Potts,et al.  Assessing the occurrence of elaborative inferences: Lexical decision versus naming , 1988 .

[9]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Speed and Accuracy in the Processing of False Statements About Semantic Information , 1982 .

[10]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Cue-dependent forgetting. , 1974 .

[11]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Time course of priming for associate and inference words in a discourse context , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[12]  B. Murdock.  A Theory for the Storage and Retrieval of Item and Associative Information. , 1982 .

[13]  J. Fodor.  The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[14]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A retrieval theory of priming in memory. , 1988, Psychological review.

[15]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Contextually relevant aspects of meaning. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Semantic associations and elaborative inference. , 1989 .

[17]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[18]  Dennis Norris,et al.  Word recognition: Context effects without priming , 1986, Cognition.

[19]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Memory models, text processing, and cue-dependent retrieval. , 1989 .

[20]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Automatic and strategic priming in recognition , 1981 .

[21]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Similarity information versus relational information: Differences in the time course of retrieval , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .

[23]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[24]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Inferences about predictable events. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The role of practice in fact retrieval. , 1985 .

[26]  K. Forster.  Priming and the Effects of Sentence and Lexical Contexts on Naming Time: Evidence for Autonomous Lexical Processing* , 1981 .