Naming and Categorizing Faces and Written Names

In naming and categorization tasks, subjects were able to name aloud written names faster than photographs of faces, but were usually able to classify faces on familiarity (Experiment 1) or occupation (Experiments 2, 3 and 4) faster than written names. Faces were categorized faster than they were named, but written names were named faster than they could be categorized. Experiment 5 showed that familiar names were named more quickly than “rearranged” names made by exchanging the first and second names of familiar people. This pattern of findings is consistent with the view that faces can only access name (phonological) codes via an intervening semantic representation, whereas written names can access semantic and name codes in parallel. In this respect, faces show properties similar to those of other visual objects, despite a priori reasons why this might not have been expected to be the case.

[1]  E M Critchley,et al.  The human face. , 1985, British medical journal.

[2]  R L Klatzky,et al.  Semantic interpretation effects on memory for faces , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[3]  A. Young,et al.  The faces that launched a thousand slips: everyday difficulties and errors in recognizing people. , 1985, British journal of psychology.

[4]  R L Klatzky,et al.  Recognizing familiar and unfamiliar faces , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[5]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Human Visual Cognition , 1979 .

[6]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[7]  V. Bruce Searching for Politicians: An Information-Processing Approach to Face Recognition , 1979 .

[8]  A. Young,et al.  Familiarity decisions for faces presented to the left and right cerebral hemispheres , 1985, Brain and Cognition.

[9]  H. Ellis 2 – THE ROLE OF THE RIGHT HEMISPHERE IN FACE PERCEPTION , 1983 .

[10]  V. S. Reed,et al.  Learning to Order Pictures and Words: A Model of Sensory and Semantic Encoding. , 1977 .

[11]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  Roger S. Brown,et al.  The "Tip of the Tongue" Phenomenon , 1966 .

[13]  Judith F. Kroll,et al.  Recognizing words, pictures, and concepts: A comparison of lexical, object, and reality decisions , 1984 .

[14]  John Morton,et al.  Facilitation in Word Recognition: Experiments Causing Change in the Logogen Model , 1979 .

[15]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Influence of Social-Category Activation on Processing of Visual Information , 1982 .

[16]  C. Richard Puff,et al.  Handbook of research methods in human memory and cognition , 1983 .

[17]  D L Hintzman,et al.  What causes the spacing effect? Some effects of repetition, duration, and spacing on memory for pictures , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[18]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[19]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Dissociations of language function in dementia: A case study , 1979, Brain and Language.

[20]  Edward J. Shoben,et al.  CHAPTER 10 – Semantic and Lexical Decisions , 1982 .

[21]  M. Potter,et al.  Time to understand pictures and words , 1975, Nature.

[22]  A. D. Yarmey,et al.  I recognize your face but I can’t remember your name: Further evidence on the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[23]  J. Morton,et al.  The effects of priming on picture recognition. , 1982, British journal of psychology.

[24]  H. Ellis Recognizing faces. , 1975, British journal of psychology.