Recipes for cookies: how institutions shape communication technologies

The ability of communication technologies to favor certain societal concerns, such as privacy, is widely recognized. This article argues that an institutional analysis is central to understanding how a technology affects a societal concern. This is demonstrated with a case study of cookie technology, which has been shaped in differing ways by universities, firms and consortia. A comparative institutional analysis finds that each of these institutions act according to their own norms and processes in influencing the recipe for cookies. It is these institutional tendencies that shape cookie technology. By understanding these tendencies, policymakers can better assess, predict and proactively influence the development of communication technologies to improve societal welfare.

[1]  Telecommunications Board Staff.  Making It Better: Expanding Information Technology Research to Meet Society's Needs , 2000 .

[2]  Dan Dimancescu,et al.  The new alliance , 1986 .

[3]  Dave Crocker,et al.  Making standards the IETF way , 1993, STAN.

[4]  Joshua Quittner,et al.  Speeding the Net: The Inside Story of Netscape and How It Challenged Microsoft , 1998 .

[5]  Jeff White,et al.  Coordinating technology: Studies in the international standardization of telecommunications , 1998 .

[6]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Cookies and Web browser design: toward realizing informed consent online , 2001, CHI.

[7]  P. Agre.  THE ARCHITECTURE OF IDENTITY: Embedding privacy in market institutions , 1999 .

[8]  Robin Mansell,et al.  The New Telecommunications: A Political Economy of Network Evolution , 1994 .

[9]  A. Feenberg.  The critical theory of technology , 1990 .

[10]  Sandra Braman.  Communication researchers and policy-making , 2003 .

[11]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  The technical code of the internet/world wide web , 2000 .

[12]  Jasmine Schwartz.  Giving the Web a Memory Cost Its Users Privacy , 2001 .

[13]  W. Aspray,et al.  Inventing the internet , 1997, IEEE Spectrum.

[14]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[15]  C. Avgerou.  Information Systems and Global Diversity , 2002 .

[16]  V. Mosco.  political economy of communication , 1996 .

[17]  Stuart Biegel.  Beyond Our Control? Confronting the Limits of Our Legal System in the Age of Cyberspace , 2001 .

[18]  D. Edge,et al.  The social shaping of technology , 1988 .

[19]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[20]  Matt Ratto,et al.  Embedded Technical Expression: Code and the Leveraging of Functionality , 2005, Inf. Soc..

[21]  Robert Reid,et al.  Architects of the Web : 1,000 days that built the future of business , 1997 .

[22]  D. Smythe,et al.  On Critical and Administrative Research: A New Critical Analysis , 1983 .

[23]  Grigori Pasko,et al.  Cookies , 2005 .

[24]  R. Westrum.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems , 1989 .

[25]  Andrew Updegrove,et al.  Standard setting and consortium structures , 1995, STAN.

[26]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace , 1999 .

[27]  Jay P. Kesan,et al.  SHAPING CODE , 2005 .

[28]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Bias in computer systems , 1996, TOIS.

[29]  J. Bauer.  Harnessing the Swarm Communications Policy in an Era of Ubiquitous Networks and Disruptive Technologies ( , 2004 .

[30]  Rob Kling.  What Is Social Informatics and Why Does It Matter? , 2007, Inf. Soc..

[31]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Defining the Web: The Politics of Search Engines , 2000, Computer.

[32]  Ithiel de Sola Pool,et al.  Technologies of Freedom , 1983 .

[33]  Martin Weiss,et al.  Consortia in the Standards Development Process , 1992, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[34]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[35]  Owen Edwards,et al.  Netscape Time: The Making of the Billion-Dollar Start-Up That Took on Microsoft , 1999 .

[36]  Rohan Samarajiva,et al.  Regulating “Caller ID:” Emulation and learning in US state-level telecommunication policy processes☆ , 1996 .

[37]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[38]  James W. Botkin,et al.  The New Alliance: America's R&D Consortia , 1988 .

[39]  Leonard N. Foner.  Technology and Political Artifacts: The CFP2000 Workshop on Freedom and Privacy by Design , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[40]  Jane Secker,et al.  Digital Copyright , 2006, Program.

[41]  Viktor Mayer-Schönberger,et al.  The internet and privacy legislation: Cookies for a treat? , 1998, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[42]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Understanding open source software development , 2002 .

[43]  J. Fountain.  Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change , 2001 .

[44]  Robert W. McChesney,et al.  The Internet and U. S. Communication Policy-Making in Historical and Critical Perspective , 1996, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[45]  D. North.  Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[46]  Dan Schiller,et al.  Digital Capitalism: Networking the Global Market System , 1999 .

[47]  John T. Scott.  Historical and Economic Perspectives of the National Cooperative Research Act , 1989 .

[48]  Mark Fischetti,et al.  Weaving the web - the original design and ultimate destiny of the World Wide Web by its inventor , 1999 .

[49]  Yumio Saneyoshi,et al.  Coordinating Technology: Studies in the International Standardization of Telecommunications. By Susanne K. Schmidt and Raymund Werle · Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1998. viii + 365 pp. Figures, tables, photographs, notes, references, and index. $35.00. ISBN 0262193930 , 1998, Business History Review.

[50]  Robert Cailliau,et al.  How the Web Was Born: The Story of the World Wide Web , 2000 .

[51]  R. Hawkins,et al.  The rise of consortia in the information and communication technology industries: emerging implications for policy , 1999 .

[52]  David M. Kristol,et al.  HTTP Cookies: Standards, privacy, and politics , 2001, TOIT.

[53]  Michael C. Loui,et al.  Taking the byte out of cookies: privacy, consent, and the Web , 1998, SIGCAS Comput. Soc..

[54]  Charles Vincent,et al.  Looking to the Internet for models of governance , 2004, Ethics and Information Technology.

[55]  R. Nelson.  The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research , 1959, Journal of Political Economy.

[56]  Sandra Braman.  The Long View , 2003 .

[57]  Rohan Samarajiva,et al.  Telecommunication networks as social space: implications for research and policy and an exemplar , 1997 .

[58]  Rob Kling,et al.  What Is Social Informatics and Why Does It Matter? , 2007, D Lib Mag..

[59]  P. Boczkowski.  Mutual Shaping of Users and Technologies in a National Virtual Community , 1999 .

[60]  Keith Moore,et al.  Use of HTTP State Management , 2000, RFC.

[61]  Richard A. V. Diener,et al.  Technologies of freedom , 1987, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[62]  Harvey Brooks,et al.  Research universities and the social contract for science , 1993 .

[63]  Bill Helling.  Web-Site Sensitivity to Privacy Concerns: Collecting Personally Identifiable Information and Passing Persistent Cookies , 1998, First Monday.

[64]  Colin J. Bennett.  Cookies, web bugs, webcams and cue cats: Patterns of surveillance on the world wide web , 2001, Ethics and Information Technology.

[65]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution , 1997 .