A response surface approach to fatigue reliability of ship structures

Today ship designers are facing ever more stringent safety and environmental requirements as well as economic ones. With the advancement of rules and procedures in the classification societies and the tailwind of modern computing technology, spectral fatigue based on first principles has become commonplace in ship design. So far the centrepiece of such a process is by and large a deterministic acceptance criterion despite the highly uncertain nature of the problem. As a result, the observed damage in a fatigue prone area is often significantly inconsistent with the predicted one, making client-facing a daunting task. As a small step towards a reliability-based solution, this paper attempts to introduce structural uncertainties into established fatigue design assessment process such as the ShipRight FDA3 procedure and the supporting software by Lloyd's Register. Key design parameters are randomised in a spectral fatigue model, where a pseudo-excitation method is used to reflect the non-linear effect of inertial loads and external wave pressure in the splash zone. A stepwise response surface method is used in tandem with t by t fine mesh finite element analysis to obtain the probability of failure. The calculation is demonstrated for an oil tanker example.

[1]  Sergei Petinov Fatigue Analysis of Ship Structures , 2003 .

[2]  C. S. Manohar,et al.  An improved response surface method for the determination of failure probability and importance measures , 2004 .

[3]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis , 1993 .

[4]  N. Gayton,et al.  CQ2RS: a new statistical approach to the response surface method for reliability analysis , 2003 .

[5]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Effect of response surface parameter variation on structural reliability estimates , 2001 .

[6]  Sang Hyo Kim,et al.  Response surface method using vector projected sampling points , 1997 .

[7]  Bernt J. Leira,et al.  Application of response surfaces for reliability analysis of marine structures , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  Tai-Yan Kam,et al.  BUCKLING FAILURE PROBABILITY OF IMPERFECT ELASTIC FRAMES , 1992 .

[9]  Lei Yu,et al.  Stepwise Response Surface Method and its Application in Reliability Analysis of Ship Hull Structure , 2002 .

[10]  Y Zheng,et al.  A benchmark study on response surface method , 2006 .

[11]  Espen H. Cramer,et al.  Fatigue assessment of ship structures , 1995 .

[12]  Lin Jia-hao,et al.  A fast CQC algorithm of psd matrices for random seismic responses , 1992 .

[13]  Turan Dirlik,et al.  Application of computers in fatigue analysis , 1985 .

[14]  P. Das,et al.  Cumulative formation of response surface and its use in reliability analysis , 2000 .

[15]  C. Bucher,et al.  A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems , 1990 .

[16]  P. H. Wirsching,et al.  Fatigue Under Wide Band Random Stresses Using the Rain-Flow Method , 1977 .