How Much NMR Data Is Required To Determine a Protein–Ligand Complex Structure?

Here we present an NMR‐based approach to solving protein–ligand structures. The procedure is guided by biophysical, biochemical, or knowledge‐based data. The structures are mainly derived from ligand‐induced chemical‐shift perturbations (CSP) induced in the resonances of the protein and ligand‐detected saturated transfer difference signals between ligands and selectively labeled proteins (SOS‐NMR). Accuracy, as judged by comparison with X‐ray results, depends on the nature and completeness of the experimental data. An experimental protocol is proposed that starts with calculations that make use of readily available chemical‐shift perturbations as experimental constraints. If necessary, more sophisticated experimental results have to be added to improve the accuracy of the protein–ligand complex structure. The criteria for evaluation and selection of meaningful complex structures are discussed. These are exemplified for three complexes, and we show that the approach bridges the gap between theoretical docking approaches and complex NMR schemes for determining protein–ligand complexes; especially for relatively weak binders that do not lead to intermolecular NOEs.

[1]  C. Dominguez,et al.  HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[2]  B. Shoichet,et al.  Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo, apo, and modeled conformations of enzymes. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[3]  M. Congreve,et al.  Fragment-based lead discovery , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[4]  D. Baker,et al.  A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein–protein complexes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  W. Delano The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System , 2002 .

[6]  Jonathan W. Essex,et al.  A review of protein-small molecule docking methods , 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[7]  Kenneth M Merz,et al.  Pose scoring by NMR. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[8]  M. McCoy,et al.  Spatial localization of ligand binding sites from electron current density surfaces calculated from NMR chemical shift perturbations. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[9]  R J Read,et al.  Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. , 1998, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[10]  C. Griesinger,et al.  Transferred Cross-Correlated Relaxation: Application to the Determination of Sugar Pucker in an Aminoacylated tRNA-Mimetic Weakly Bound to EF-Tu , 1999 .

[11]  D S Lawrence,et al.  Identification of a second aryl phosphate-binding site in protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B: a paradigm for inhibitor design. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Susan S. Taylor,et al.  Crystal structures of the myristylated catalytic subunit of cAMP‐dependent protein kinase reveal open and closed conformations , 1993, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[13]  P. Hajduk,et al.  SOS-NMR: a saturation transfer NMR-based method for determining the structures of protein-ligand complexes. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[14]  Jordi Mestres,et al.  Guided docking approaches to structure-based design and screening. , 2004, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[15]  L. Iversen,et al.  2-(Oxalylamino)-Benzoic Acid Is a General, Competitive Inhibitor of Protein-tyrosine Phosphatases* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  Harren Jhoti,et al.  High-throughput crystallography for lead discovery in drug design , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[17]  W. Jahnke,et al.  Transferred Cross-Correlated Relaxation Complements Transferred NOE: Structure of an IL-4R-Derived Peptide Bound to STAT-6 , 1999 .

[18]  Harald Schwalbe,et al.  NMR Backbone Assignment of a Protein Kinase Catalytic Domain by a Combination of Several Approaches: Application to the Catalytic Subunit of cAMP‐Dependent Protein Kinase , 2004, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[19]  G. Varani,et al.  How accurately and precisely can RNA structure be determined by NMR? , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  Heteronuclear filters in two-dimensional [1H, 1H]-NMR spectroscopy: combined use with isotope labelling for studies of macromolecular conformation and intermolecular interactions , 1990, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[21]  J. Bajorath,et al.  Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[22]  P. Hajduk,et al.  Discovering High-Affinity Ligands for Proteins: SAR by NMR , 1996, Science.

[23]  C. Hughes,et al.  Adducin Regulation , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  M Nilges,et al.  Calculation of protein structures with ambiguous distance restraints. Automated assignment of ambiguous NOE crosspeaks and disulphide connectivities. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  Bernd Meyer,et al.  Characterization of Ligand Binding by Saturation Transfer Difference NMR Spectroscopy. , 1999, Angewandte Chemie.

[26]  Susan S. Taylor,et al.  Dynamic features of cAMP-dependent protein kinase revealed by apoenzyme crystal structure. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  Feng Ni,et al.  Recent developments in transferred NOE methods , 1994 .

[28]  M Nilges,et al.  Automated assignment of ambiguous nuclear overhauser effects with ARIA. , 2001, Methods in enzymology.

[29]  E. Goldsmith,et al.  Structural basis of inhibitor selectivity in MAP kinases. , 1998, Structure.

[30]  Maurizio Pellecchia,et al.  NMR-based structural characterization of large protein-ligand interactions , 2002, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[31]  G M Clore,et al.  Exploring the limits of precision and accuracy of protein structures determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions , 2002, Proteins.

[33]  Michael Nilges,et al.  Ambiguous NOEs and automated NOE assignment , 1998 .

[34]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  Data‐driven docking for the study of biomolecular complexes , 2005, The FEBS journal.

[35]  E. Goldsmith,et al.  The structure of mitogen-activated protein kinase p38 at 2.1-A resolution. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Yu-Chin Li,et al.  Letter to the Editor: Backbone resonance assignment of the 298 amino acid catalytic domain of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) , 2002, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[37]  V. Jayalakshmi,et al.  CORCEMA refinement of the bound ligand conformation within the protein binding pocket in reversibly forming weak complexes using STD-NMR intensities. , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[38]  T R Burke,et al.  Structural basis for inhibition of the protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B by phosphotyrosine peptide mimetics. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[39]  B. Meyer,et al.  Charakterisierung von Ligandenbindung durch Sättigungstransfer‐Differenz‐NMR‐Spektroskopie , 1999 .